Parasitic wasps turn other insects into ‘zombies,’ saving millions of humans along the way

Wasps have a reputation for being jerks because of their perceived aggressiveness and ability to sting repeatedly. They’re often negatively compared with the honey production and agricultural pollination of bees.

If wasps are jerks, however, they are positively saintly compared to their parasitic brethren.

Parasitic wasps sting to inject their eggs into a host, often accompanied by venom and a virus. Their larvae grow and eventually emerge from the unwitting host — usually killing it. Then they becoming adults and fly off to continue the cycle.

Some wasps go further, controlling their host’s behaviour, effectively “zombifying” them to help the larva survive. After studying the behaviour of ichneumon wasps, which lay their eggs in moth larvae, naturalist Charles Darwin wrote that they were so evil that they were proof against the idea that God was directing evolution:


While no wasps are known to lay eggs in humans (although some flies do), they have inspired films like the Alien franchise and the recently released monster survival video game House of Ashes.







But whether inspiring horror or metaphysical questions, parasitic wasps also save millions of human lives.

Parasitic wasps to the rescue​


In the 1970s, the cassava mealybug (Phenacoccus manihoti) entered Western and Central Africa as an invasive pest species from Brazil. It rapidly spread across cassava fields causing crop losses as high as 80 per cent. The cassava plant is a staple food crop because it is drought-resistant. The mealybug invasion threatened the food base of 200 million people.

The Swiss entomologist Hans Rudolf Herren, who was conducting research in the area, found a wasp parasitizing the mealybug (Epidinocarsis lopezi). The parasitic wasp posed little risk to sub-Saharan species.

After rearing the wasps and gathering funding, Herren bought planes and co-ordinated strategic airdrops and ground release of wasp cocoons to areas affected by the mealybug. From those locations, the wasp populations grew and spread on their own, reducing the mealybug population to manageable levels for years.

This effort saved an estimated 20 million lives, billions in crops and avoided the use of pesticides. Herren received the World Food Prize in 1995 for his efforts.







Biocontrol heroes​


Biocontrol is the use of one organism to combat a pest, and this was far from the only successful case of wasps as biocontrol. Wasps have successfully defended against many crop pests in Chinese agriculture.

The samurai wasp (Trissolcus japonicus) was being studied for potential use against the brown marmorated stinkbug, a threat to many crops across the continental United States. However, the wasp preempted this, moving into stinkbug territories on its own.

Wasps are even being deployed to prevent moths from damaging historical sites and their artifacts. Here in Canada, at least four wasp species have been released to control the emerald ash borer, a cause of deforestation across Canada.

Pros and cons​


Biocontrol has several advantages over pesticides. Populations can grow and spread on their own, as demonstrated by the samurai wasps, whereas pesticides typically need humans to spread them. Organisms can maintain their presence over the long-term without human intervention, while pesticides often require repeat applications. Pests can also evolve to resist pesticides in as few as 20 generations. And as biocontrol uses another organism, they can evolve in response the pest’s defences.

Biocontrol is not free from issues. It often introduces a new invasive species to deal with an existing one. It can be difficult to predict the effects of a new species on an unprepared ecosystem.

For example, the cane toad was introduced in Australia to eat several insect pests there. Instead, the poisonous toad became a lethal meal for several native species, disrupting many other parts of the ecosystems there.


file-20211027-15-1y65pcf.jpg

A laughing kookaburra eats a cane toad. Some kookaburras die from ingesting the poisonous toads.

Parasites may avoid some of these issues as, unlike predators, they are often limited to a single or very few host species, making them less likely to go off-target and affect species other than the intended one.

Given that most agricultural pests are insects and most pest insects are targeted by at least one parasitic wasp (there are an estimated 750,000 parasitic wasp species), this gives a legion of options to study for safe and effective pest management.

So next time you’re online and see wasps being unfairly maligned, consider the millions of humans across the world who are alive and able to feed themselves because of them. And maybe this upcoming Halloween, should you encounter the spirit of a certain 1800s English naturalist going on about the theological implications of parasitic wasps’ evil, tell him of the good they can do.




Not really news but more of a conversational topic, still I had no way of resisting my desire to share this article here for the people who are willing to give it a read :cattap
 
Also for some reason this article is circulating around most bionews sites like it's actual breakthrough discovery or you know... news. Still I take any opportunity for showing people how the term wasps applies to a lot more than your yellow jackets and hornets. In fact non-parasitic wasps barely even register on the scale of the whole group.
 

Some Schlub

Preeminent
I can say with certainty that Red Paper Wasps are malicious little fuckers.

Yellow Jackets, though, are way too comfortable with people.
 

Some Schlub

Preeminent
I dont hit the Yellow Jackets, I just kinda shoo them away or cover whatever of my food they're trying to pick off from.

They usually get the hint. :cat)
 

jane

queen of the losers.
V.I.P. Member
Pronouns
She/Her
i was at a thing outside a couple months ago and a wasp started following me, like hanging out right at the side of my face and wouldn't go away when i tried walking away. i was reduced to a panicking mess because of a fucking bug
 

Some Schlub

Preeminent
i was at a thing outside a couple months ago and a wasp started following me, like hanging out right at the side of my face and wouldn't go away when i tried walking away. i was reduced to a panicking mess because of a fucking bug
"Hey gurl, you smell like flowers.' :cat)
 
Got stung by a yellow jacket as a kid, was with grandma and she took some dirt from the ground (we were at the park) and mixed it with saliva before applying it to the stung area, believe it or not I felt no pain and suffered only a minimal swelling.
 

Nep Nep

Forbidden Boi Kunt
Administrator
Got stung by a wasp once, only felt like I got painless electrocution, essentially I felt no pain and simply felt the rapid beating of its wings.

As for later, it did swell and was mildly achy.
 

Some Schlub

Preeminent
I couldn't possibly remember accurately but it was probably red? The only closeup I ever got of the species was one that landed on my leg before I wacked it.
Yeah sounds about right.


Yellow Jackets are too friendly.
Red Jackets are assholes.
 

Ultra

THE BEAR
Advisor
Also for some reason this article is circulating around most bionews sites like it's actual breakthrough discovery or you know... news. Still I take any opportunity for showing people how the term wasps applies to a lot more than your yellow jackets and hornets. In fact non-parasitic wasps barely even register on the scale of the whole group.

What's a bug guy's opinion on wiping mosquitos and black flies from the face of the earth, from an ecological standpoint?
 
What's a bug guy's opinion on wiping mosquitos and black flies from the face of the earth, from an ecological standpoint?
Single species might have minimal side effects but the whole family consisting of like 3k+ species? Yeah no.

It's called a food chain for a reason, you take out one organism but it send ripples through many more. Granted natural extinctions do this all the time on a grander scale and we are currently making species extinct on a scale comparable to mass extinctions of old so what can I say really.
 

Ultra

THE BEAR
Advisor
Single species might have minimal side effects but the whole family consisting of like 3k+ species? Yeah no.

It's called a food chain for a reason, you take out one organism but it send ripples through many more. Granted natural extinctions do this all the time on a grander scale and we are currently making species extinct on a scale comparable to mass extinctions of old so what can I say really.

Well as a general principle, you don't want to take a species out of the foodchain yeah, but I had heard somewhere or someplace that we can afford to wipe out mosquitos, at least in certain parts of the world, since they're parasitic and their primary role is to be food for fish/frogs/etc that could be filled by a non bloodsucking insect. As for blackflies, I'm referring specifically to the specie(s) that live in the north arctic in the summer and make it almost inhabitable, they proliferate quite readily since the extreme winters deter their main predators so I wonder what would happen if they all got wiped. Maybe replaced by ants.
 
Back
Top