• We're looking for artists. Direct message Dr. Watson for more info!

Game Official Ranked The Boys: Mafia - Game Thread (Day 6)

Status
Not open for further replies.
info that influenced his decision directly that he didnt think would influence anyone else to vote poyser?? Bullshit
Also doesn't seem to understand what I mean when I said "I didn't want to out my role because I didn't think people should be outing their roles for that".
 
yeah we definitely needed you d2, not sure that's the case at this point since I'm being forced to choose
do what u want then, not really sure how im supposed to convince someone who reads me town, agreed with my not using the duel last phase unless we were in danger of no lynch, knows that i was right abt poyser and scchamp who were the 2 wagons last day (unless scchamp is sk ig), and decided to protect me last night too

ill remind u, town lost members after everyone refused to believe me on ratchet and lynched me instead
feels like deja vu tbh
i have the same role as i did in that game as well
 
Roman Reigns Reaction GIF by WWE


Vote hime to win
#ripbozo
 
The deciding in question:


I mean, it's beyond parody isn't it really. I can't possibly be any clearer here lol. People will believe what they want even when they're told otherwise.
u also said that u can "easily see me as indie"
making it seem like i like to throw or something
 
Also doesn't seem to understand what I mean when I said "I didn't want to out my role because I didn't think people should be outing their roles for that".
no u shouldve.

u clearly stated that ur role made u decide to vote poyser
u had info that directly influenced how u voted on a very close wagon last day and u decided to hide it

one more vanilla claim being outed is not at all going to make a difference when all the others claimed
 
ppl voting scchamp thought that he was the odd one out
they had no idea there was another vanilla out there

knowing that info mightve made more ppl decide that poyser was the better option to vote
u hid that from town.
 
ppl voting scchamp thought that he was the odd one out
they had no idea there was another vanilla out there

knowing that info mightve made more ppl decide that poyser was the better option to vote
u hid that from town.
is this the kind of thoughtfulness ur looking for? @Tempest
someone with info who makes decisions on close lynches based on it and doesnt share it with the class^
u think that is better? really?
 
I don't really want to lynch Poyser to be honest. I do understand the considerations at play and there is value in confirming the info because it at minimum gives a cap on the number of Vanilla claims we can have if it's proven, and Tempest is right in that with 1 scum dead already numbers wise we are doing okay. So I understand the logic there fully.

I don't mind Champ's readlist overall, though him reading Poyser town when Poyser is claiming info that from his reads alone should make him doubt Poyser doesn't sit well with me. Was honestly hoping for a bit more from his slot too. All in all though I can't guarantee the guy is scum, I'm still leaning there and that would be my preference, for whatever that is worth.

Ekko replacing Evans means this game probably isn't going to be much fun for me from here on out, I think I'd like to give him some time to get thoughts in the thread though before moving on to lynch. We probably do need to come to a decision soon though.

@hime Outside of Poyser, who would you want to lynch today. @Tempest same question.
So this was ratchets first post following melkor contradicting poysers info. I'm not sure how this meshes with ratchet being vt.
 
u also said that u can "easily see me as indie"
making it seem like i like to throw or something
Right. But you are saying I decided that you were Indie when I, quite literally, spelled it out for you saying I think you're most likely town, possibly indie , and very unlikely to be Mafia. It's impossible for me to be any clearer lmao, you're straight up arguing that what I believe is something different to what I said.

I never said anything about throwing. I said I could see an angle wherein you are indie. And my reasoning for that is how you've used the duel, and the unrealistic paranoia that you have around it, especially yesterday, where I don't understand how you could have ever sincerely believed that, in a duel between you and Poyser, Poyser would win. That's my contention. And then I also note that your general play is not all that survival motivated, hence why I have you being town as the most likely possibility. You read me say that and then say " Ratchet thinks I'm indie". So clearly what I'm writing isn't actually getting read.
 
Even I knew Poyser was gonna be scum if RDK was town.
Ratchet kun either worst player than me, scum or disingenuous town.
I think its scum
 
dem didnt see ratchet saying i wont make the game fun for him since i subbed in

makes me sad
 
no u shouldve.

u clearly stated that ur role made u decide to vote poyser
u had info that directly influenced how u voted on a very close wagon last day and u decided to hide it

one more vanilla claim being outed is not at all going to make a difference when all the others claimed
It is because there is no reason to give scum what they want. And as I've said over and over, I thought that there was a possibility that Poyser's claim was designed to bait Vanilla claims. So I opted to hold it.
 
It is because there is no reason to give scum what they want. And as I've said over and over, I thought that there was a possibility that Poyser's claim was designed to bait Vanilla claims. So I opted to hold it.
Yeah but you were still saying you didn't want to lynch Poyser even after it should've been a foregone conclusion from your pov that he was lying?
 
So this was ratchets first post following melkor contradicting poysers info. I'm not sure how this meshes with ratchet being vt.
I've already explained this. There was room to believe that Poyser's count did not include RDK, and I was operating under the world view that Champ is scum and thus is not part of the count. Apply that and then you'll see that there was still room for Poyser to be legit with Melkor, myself and Sky all town Vanilla. However, it planted the doubt in me, and when I started to consider Champ as town, I figured the chances of Poyser lying about it increased enough to switch.

I sure do love needing to repeat the same thing two or three times over because people can't read. Truly high level Mafia this is.
 
I've already explained this. There was room to believe that Poyser's count did not include RDK, and I was operating under the world view that Champ is scum and thus is not part of the count. Apply that and then you'll see that there was still room for Poyser to be legit with Melkor, myself and Sky all town Vanilla. However, it planted the doubt in me, and when I started to consider Champ as town, I figured the chances of Poyser lying about it increased enough to switch.

I sure do love needing to repeat the same thing two or three times over because people can't read. Truly high level Mafia this is.
I'll have to see if this aligns with your play
 
It is because there is no reason to give scum what they want. And as I've said over and over, I thought that there was a possibility that Poyser's claim was designed to bait Vanilla claims. So I opted to hold it.
if u think his claim was designed to bait vanilla claims then it should be obvious he was scum from ur pov??
this makes no sense
u had at least 12 hours, probs more after melkor wouldve been the 6th "non-active night role" claim, yet u continued saying u dont want to lynch poyser for ??? reasons
 
Yeah but you were still saying you didn't want to lynch Poyser even after it should've been a foregone conclusion from your pov that he was lying?
Nope. 5 as of night 1. Hime, Fuji, Sky, Melkor, myself. I thought Champs was scum. I thought Sky/Melkor could be scum, so there was room for negotiation even if RDK counted. Which left no more room at the inn. So when Champs looked townier, there no longer existed a plausible way for Poyser to be telling the truth unless RDK didn't count and one of Sky or Melkor were scum. Which was too many assumptions for me to feel confident in making. Ergo, my vote.
 
if u think his claim was designed to bait vanilla claims then it should be obvious he was scum from ur pov??
this makes no sense
u had at least 12 hours, probs more after melkor wouldve been the 6th "non-active night role" claim, yet u continued saying u dont want to lynch poyser for ??? reasons
Again, it would help if you read what I said. I did not say I thought his claim was designed to bait Vanilla. I said I considered the possibility that it was. Being open to that possibility does not mean I believe said possibility to be true. It means I can accept that plausibly there is a scenario in which it is true. And while J may not believe in it, it bears weighting because it's plausible.
 
Nope. 5 as of night 1. Hime, Fuji, Sky, Melkor, myself. I thought Champs was scum. I thought Sky/Melkor could be scum, so there was room for negotiation even if RDK counted. Which left no more room at the inn. So when Champs looked townier, there no longer existed a plausible way for Poyser to be telling the truth unless RDK didn't count and one of Sky or Melkor were scum. Which was too many assumptions for me to feel confident in making. Ergo, my vote.
Okay this checks out
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top