• We're looking for artists. Direct message Dr. Watson for more info!

Game Official Ranked Xmas Mafia 2024 - Where Worlds Collide

Reader mode
Ratchet said:
I didn't teist anything lol. Just told you what issue I had with it and why. I have you somewhat leaning town, but it's not a very strong read. How the hell am I supposed to know what you did on MU?

I didn't call your post ingenious, I said it felt ingenuine. A post does not have to be untrue ti be ingenuine. And I outlined why - it felt like you were vested in keeping Watson as the main wagon, when as town, you have no reason to do this. But I don't judge your slot in totality from one or two posts that I find scummy. I just factor it into my overall read.

Speaking of reads, I think there is scum between Guillo and Poyser. Just not a fan if either if those slots in terms of what they've been bringing to the table. Not really sure Poyser would be scum with Melkor though and in isolation, Melkor looks like scum to me. Watson I tend to agree is probably Indie, I haven't quite been ci fident enough on her being scum even when she was getting wagoned at first. Unfortunately she didn't really help me find her then so... opyinal lynch is likely her.

Not sure on Ekko. I think there is scum between him/Craig and Laplamd but not really sure on where I stand on them all individually. Would probably say Craig maybe scum from that list if there is one.

Nothing else really to add for me, think RDK could be town or Indie rather than scum.
Click to expand...
Well, now you have this new info. Probably not fair to expect people to factor it in, but you can do it now if you’re Town.
 
Lord Melkor said:
You just told me I should not follow the wagon because I do not trust people there, so obviously one of people i do not trust?!!!!!!!

Also, my town reads are voting her too.

Majority of players here would buss Watson after botching her claim and of course you know it!
Click to expand...
Most of us were on her before her claim tho u fookin muppet
 
Ratchet said:
I didn't teist anything lol. Just told you what issue I had with it and why. I have you somewhat leaning town, but it's not a very strong read. How the hell am I supposed to know what you did on MU?

I didn't call your post ingenious, I said it felt ingenuine. A post does not have to be untrue ti be ingenuine. And I outlined why - it felt like you were vested in keeping Watson as the main wagon, when as town, you have no reason to do this. But I don't judge your slot in totality from one or two posts that I find scummy. I just factor it into my overall read.

Speaking of reads, I think there is scum between Guillo and Poyser. Just not a fan if either if those slots in terms of what they've been bringing to the table. Not really sure Poyser would be scum with Melkor though and in isolation, Melkor looks like scum to me. Watson I tend to agree is probably Indie, I haven't quite been ci fident enough on her being scum even when she was getting wagoned at first. Unfortunately she didn't really help me find her then so... opyinal lynch is likely her.

Not sure on Ekko. I think there is scum between him/Craig and Laplamd but not really sure on where I stand on them all individually. Would probably say Craig maybe scum from that list if there is one.

Nothing else really to add for me, think RDK could be town or Indie rather than scum.
Click to expand...
You’re not a fan of what I’ve been bringing to the table yet you think both the people I’m pushing are scum

lol good point, well made
 
Ratchet said:
I can get on board with this - why though?
Click to expand...
hes been saying vote for hire last game when the gamestate got giga boing and he gave up. hes trynna act cute and do it again here thinking it'd get him town read. the gamestate here in day 1 is by no means as boring as how last game got in day 5 so it feels fake to enter into "vote for hire" state this early
 
Poyser said:
Why do people keep saying this? It really isn’t true and it’s also against the spirit of the game for someone that wants to play properly
Click to expand...
Well if you are mafia and outed, you can look at it like this:
You hold all the cards, you have the full set of info. You can use them to manipulate the town. Now when you are outed, you can still accidentally leak info which can negatively impact your team even in antispew. There are reasons for why a mafia would choose to talk about certain new slots and those can be analyzed in context and what they mean. That's why I generally think it's bad to give out new info when you are functionally gonna die anyway
 
.guillo said:
That is what you would do, not every scum player opts to do the same thing.
I don't know how experienced Watson is to try to go for the anti-spew route, but I know many players that do and are successful at entangling the thread with aniti-spew.
Click to expand...
its not hard to anti spew. just be quiet and it works lol
 
Lappland said:
If she flips exactly not mafia I can treat her posts from here out as still legit and solve with them in mind.
Click to expand...
Of course, if she flips town or solo neutral, then we can treat all her posts as legit yah, although, if she is town, then i dont get the logic of fooling around with several claims that got her deeper in the situation she is in.
 
.guillo said:
Of course, if she flips town or solo neutral, then we can treat all her posts as legit yah, although, if she is town, then i dont get the logic of fooling around with several claims that got her deeper in the situation she is in.
Click to expand...
Well quite frankly she isn't town. People said it here: Town would not receive fakeclaims

I am gonna assume solo neutral because her posting kinda feels like that.
 
Reader mode
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top