Can't argue with thatExcellent usage from Guillo by the way.
Can't argue with thatExcellent usage from Guillo by the way.
Why aren't you asking for MY claim?I don't care what you see. We can still get claims today and you basically haven't played this game, so you should claim to at least give something from your slot.
Where have I said that I think they're scum? I'm asking you about your reads - you're the only player in the game who can explain your reasoning.Obviously we're going in circles; your asking me why I town read them or lean town on them, and I'm asking you why you are doing opposite.
Would you like me to repeat the question?Uhhhh.
You don't think voting scum warrants a town read? Or even indicates town? If you want to argue that my scum range is basically infinite, then go for it, but then the question becomes what are you doing to read me? Because if you don't know what could be town-indicative of me, and you don't know what you're looking for, and a good track record isn't enough, then there frankly isn't anything that I could list here that you would accept. At which point, your argument becomes disingenuous.Yeah I know: I thought I made it crystal clear that its difficult to read you from my POV because you are a frustratingly elusive person to peg down to an alignment. So I'll repeat again, why shouldn't I have you as non-town? Nothing you've done has been outside your wheelhouse or past actions when you were non-town indie or especially mafia.
Sure, but relying on Alexis is an entirely separate matter. And you've already conceded Magic.Wasn't Alexis instructed to protect him?
Uh, hold on - what sort of rebuttal are you looking for exactly? Because as Town, I have absolutely no way of knowing what the reasoning behind who Mafia are killing or not killing is. If I did, that would imply I'm with them. My only recourse here is to point out that I can't possibly have an answer to your question (it's a bad question for this reason) - why are you then complaining about this when any other answer I have to give is inherently more suspicious, OBJECTIVELY so? I could offer co lecture, which I already have done - I even laid it out with A, B and C for ease of reading. But if you don't want conjecture, and you don't want me to point out that I can't know why they're not killing me because I'm not in their chat, then you're going to have to explain what it is you're looking for. Otherwise, I'm going to assume that you don't actually have an argument.That's not really a rebuttal. Is it not basic mafia 101 to kill players who are strongly able to prevent their own lynching? Why do they leave you around to linger?
What does TMI have to do with it? Why, just about everything! You used Flower not killing me as a point I needed to defend. I'm explaining to you that if Flower is Indie, and in fact, even if she's Mafia, unless I'm aligned with her (and if she's Indie, that's not in play) then her not killing me has absolutely no bearing on my alignment, because she would have no more information than you do about my alignment.What does TMI have to do with anything? Her hesitance around committing to kill you when she knows it would still benefit her team if she is mafia not indie, wouldn't make sense from a logical standpoint. She got rid of Ekko, why would she hesitate around getting rid of you?
Okay well you've only presented it upon being suspected today. So it sure looks like OMGUS. The problem with the above is that none of this went anywhere. You can point to isolated interactions and say they're clearing, but when we look at your mechanical actions, that is, your votes, you were voting for Watson I believe Day 1, and Day 2 you were pushing for Ekko over Sparkles. So that's two Days in a row where you're pushing away from the lynched scum. Now maybe you think that's unfair. That's okay, you have today, and possibly tomorrow, to generate your own pushes to help clear you.That's not omgus, I just thought about who pushed on Ekko alongside me or who pushed Evans. Or who still lists me as potential scum despite me pushing on X for a decent while and pushing Goddessblade yesterday.
Well Goddessblade tried to push me yesterday then instantly flipped her read on me because of a singular post. She in fact did call me scum and then instantly townlock me and fucked off.
I also said we should go for her today as well for that at EoD yesterday.
Flower targetted Ekko with her PR and I wouldn't do it personally. I think she did it to pocket me, and it worked.
I'll give you the Melkor thing. As for the first part, as scum you do tend to town side quite a lot by suspecting your scum mates, and often parking your vote on them where it goes nowhere. So it's not all that clearing to me.You could look at the facts before randomly wanting me to claim tbh
Namely I voted only scum yesterday
And before that d1 I came in late to help hammer Melkor when I could have simply stayed absent
Looking super good for me tbh!
I suspect you less than Lappland and you're more engaged than Tweet. Youd be, like, fourth or fifth in the order, and I'm not of the mind that we need to extract 5 claims today. Actually I think there is a reasonable chance that you're town.Why aren't you asking for MY claim?
2 people asked for it, one of them apparently being cop. I'm not going to argue and get defensive for no reason. Idk if there's sth working in Lapp's favour but i guess it's weird. I thought he put me as Town last DPThere is no reason for Chuck of all players to be claiming today before the likes of Tweet.
I saw this read earlier in your ISO. Where would you say your confidence level is at with what you use to read Tweet? I'm open to working with it.Gonna say tweet is town on vibes and shit here. trusting my instincts on him.
And voted 2 scums and pushed 3rd one while noone else really did. What have you done? O:Chuck has been wish washy the ENTIRE game and dodged committing to any invested reads.
To answer your question yes Evans confirms Watson, and the mech on Sparkles was that Pqwerty tracked her to X and Poyser. The assumption was a busdrive. Obviously that was mistaken, but with the right result.2 people asked for it, one of them apparently being cop. I'm not going to argue and get defensive for no reason. Idk if there's sth working in Lapp's favour but i guess it's weird. I thought he put me as Town last DP
Why do you say Sparkle, I also pushed X yesterday and was one of the people who wanted to kill X and Sparkles no matter whatOkay well you've only presented it upon being suspected today. So it sure looks like OMGUS. The problem with the above is that none of this went anywhere. You can point to isolated interactions and say they're clearing, but when we look at your mechanical actions, that is, your votes, you were voting for Watson I believe Day 1, and Day 2 you were pushing for Ekko over Sparkles. So that's two Days in a row where you're pushing away from the lynched scum. Now maybe you think that's unfair. That's okay, you have today, and possibly tomorrow, to generate your own pushes to help clear you.
I'm working to the assumption that Flower is an Indie.
Wasn't sure if it was PQ or Tweet really. I guess people were just meming at EoDTo answer your question yes Evans confirms Watson, and the mech on Sparkles was that Pqwerty tracked her to X and Poyser. The assumption was a busdrive. Obviously that was mistaken, but with the right result.
90%I saw this read earlier in your ISO. Where would you say your confidence level is at with what you use to read Tweet? I'm open to working with it.
Gonna say tweet is town on vibes and shit here. trusting my instincts on him.