I mean yeah I remember all the games I hostcan u remember what the game was called?
you may take a while to swing at someone (not even sure if this is true but I'll probably check) but you are usually very free and easy with explaining why you think people are town in the early going. feels like you haven't tried to analyse anything at all in this game so farreread
im saying i don't think gram has paid attention to my normally slowburn play (ill exclude my assumption it's due to brushing over my posts the majority of the time) - he has expectations of me that simply don't exist early game.
there are rare ocassions where i feel confident enough to swing right at the getgo but they're few and far between.
you're correct it's within self meta territory tho, so like ive reiterated: you see for yourself in contrast to other games or not and make a conclusion yourself
i can't help you given im self metaing
god i loathe focusing on myself because it really does nothing to progress things, but i felt it needed addressing
reread
im saying i don't think gram has paid attention to my normally slowburn play (ill exclude my assumption it's due to brushing over my posts the majority of the time) - he has expectations of me that simply don't exist early game.
there are rare ocassions where i feel confident enough to swing right at the getgo but they're few and far between.
you're correct it's within self meta territory tho, so like ive reiterated: you see for yourself in contrast to other games or not and make a conclusion yourself
i can't help you given im self metaing
god i loathe focusing on myself because it really does nothing to progress things, but i felt it needed addressing
that's honestly a fair takeyou may take a while to swing at someone (not even sure if this is true but I'll probably check) but you are usually very free and easy with explaining why you think people are town in the early going. feels like you haven't tried to analyse anything at all in this game so far
After reading this, kinda wish we'd let her ruminate before pouncing now lmao. Yes, she did 1 post and then dip for a good while. But there as soon as she came back she started weighing in on the actual game (very first post back) and here she didn't do that at all lol but Im not sure how much of that will be due to the fact that she had a wagon here and didn't there (as far as i can tell)I mean yeah I remember all the games I host
Game - Ranked - I Think You Should Leave - A Mafia Game by Sky
Rules - The phases will be a maximum of 24 hours long each, except Day 1, which will be 36 hours. - Majority lynch only. - No Night posting. - There will be no character claiming in this game. Not even hinting at it. - No out-of-game communication unless specifically provided. - If you get...onelastforum.com
what do you think is wilfully negative? specifically? you disagree with me that she hasnt really made any effort to analyse the people in this game so far?I'm not particularly enthused by this Watson direction but wouldn't exactly be giving my life for hers either. I think the reasoning provided to nudge us there by people like Poyser and CP is pretty reachy though, I kinda find it to be a willfully negative interpretation of her play so far.
Care to explain?just had a skimmy through the last 2 games and fairly confident ral is town
Do you remember any recent games when Watson was on the back foot D1 as town? As scum?After reading this, kinda wish we'd let her ruminate before pouncing now lmao. Yes, she did 1 post and then dip for a good while. But there as soon as she came back she started weighing in on the actual game (very first post back) and here she didn't do that at all lol but Im not sure how much of that will be due to the fact that she had a wagon here and didn't there (as far as i can tell)
i might explain it further later in case he contradicts my thoughts as its very earlyCare to explain?
relaxed joking vote. gad can go either way. he tends to be more relaxed later game as scum because he gets a little cocky over holding a cushy position in the thread when he's not the main focus and getting drenched in suspicionVote Lynch Boobies
tweet normally extends upon his reads, he tends to be in the background while developing info on plays. i sense he wants to take more of a firm and string presence to lead here, seems eager enough given his other postsDepends, idk the lows you've been to in the past
Would you say it's a new low for you?
ekko. just that. it's ekkoive one posted alot of people in my career. u might get added to the list
i think we're on diff wavelengths herewell, suppose she did say she liked nibel, and then seemed to take it back, and then didnt take it back when asked about it
I'm mostly referring to CP interpreting her not reacting to any of the votes on her as fear rather than carefreeness, with you it was the simple act of pointing us in her direction because up until that point I hadn't found anything wrong with her and thought she was in character as far as chatting and memeing with people goes.what do you think is wilfully negative? specifically? you disagree with me that she hasnt really made any effort to analyse the people in this game so far?
Erm yea this... this isn't itrelaxed joking vote. gad can go either way. he tends to be more relaxed later game as scum because he gets a little cocky over holding a cushy position in the thread when he's not the main focus and getting drenched in suspicion
tweet normally extends upon his reads, he tends to be in the background while developing info on plays. i sense he wants to take more of a firm and string presence to lead here, seems eager enough given his other posts
ekko. just that. it's ekko
as for tempest's vote, he's not coordinating with ekko per se. it's through the lens of seeing it as the most optimal direction to take (which i assumed correctly). he just happened to agree with ekko, i think ekko in this instance is honestly irrelevant to him.
am comfortable town reading tweet, nulling gad and ekko (need to see more from both), soft lean town on tempest
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?