.guillo
Exceptional
It is what i perceive from your push? is that not what you are accusing me of? That i wanted to lynch Watson and then i dropped it?
It is what i perceive from your push? is that not what you are accusing me of? That i wanted to lynch Watson and then i dropped it?Where did I claim this?
So there is the root of your failure, you think you have a grasp of how i play. You may know how i used to play, but a lot of how i used to play have changed. Like before I used to really try hard but now im not interested in tryharding anymore, i no longer believe the mafia community deserves that kind of investment from me after having smeared me online and ban me.
not "pushing" per se,I'm not sure why your conclusion is he's pushing Poyser's legacy, he's doing the exact opposite. Which is part of my issue with him.
For what I've seen in games he plays as town, he is a negative utility 70% of the time, he is very prone to tunnel town for stupid reasons.How bad is Ekko as villager on average? Serious question
Stubborn and hypocritical, none of those are alignment indicative. If you are here to try to force to switch off from GB, you are wasting your time.Big cloud of dross
You're obviously a stubborn player, and project such stubbornness when you say things like "I won't be moving my vote of GB today" in spite of largely no interest there, but you moved your vote off Watson for that exact reason.
I mean less in outcome but more so in reasoning, making himself readable etcFor what I've seen in games he plays as town, he is a negative utility 70% of the time, he is very prone to tunnel town for stupid reasons.
It is what i perceive from your push? is that not what you are accusing me of? That i wanted to lynch Watson and then i dropped it?
Stubborn and hypocritical, none of those are alignment indicative. If you are here to try to force to switch off from GB, you are wasting your time.
That’s accurate tbh.For what I've seen in games he plays as town, he is a negative utility 70% of the time, he is very prone to tunnel town for stupid reasons.
And?I do not forget my own reasoning
Sure, if I have no real reason to move them.ISO me. Yes, are you usually like this, you park vote on people you suspect?
Melkor/Lappland/X/Flower/Sparkles
Watson also mafia a possibility
Idk for slots after that. Wouldn’t surprise me if magic i guess or tweet
If flower is town then ratchet can be maf
Because im not scum, you can't expect me to see myself from your alleged vantage point of me.Bolded is very silly posturing.
I'm saying you're scum, why are you assuming anything else?
You and I played in champs semi finals together correct?Sure, if I have no real reason to move them.
X is in that PoE too so I don’t really get this angle@Ultra i am uh
working with the worldview that
sparkle is likely
not mafia, and
guillo tried to have us look
poyser's legacy
so we end up push
sparkle more than X. this is
the legacy, yay!
Why is it insincere if it's a perfectly reasonable expectation for him to have, as you just admitted?to be fair to guil
in deck mafia, scums can
often have more than
one source of kills but
those games are bastard unlike
ranked games. could see why
he may speculate
extra kills for scum. still feels
insincere to me
in terms of who he
is choosing to push with his
speculations, yay!
Not much, it was just a prod to see you reactAnd?
completely missed thatX is in that PoE too so I don’t really get this angle
This is nonsense. Actually another terrible argument from you, there is no correlation here. He's pushing Kiku, if he wanted to deflect to Sparkles he'd be pushing her.he's being uh cute
about it by showing us
poyser's legacy
which screams push sparkle
push sparkle. without saying
anything about
the actual lynch
wagons we have today. do
also agree push
on kiku is uh
very random, and he made
no attempt pushing
me today despite
me being his near top scum
read yesterday, yay!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?