to clarify it is not one thing in particular and not on a personal level. it's admittedly misplaced aggression and i should dial it downWell that's kinda the thing, if you're angry about something, my presumption is that there's a valid reason
In the absence of anything readily apparent I'm gonna assume you're seething over being caught as the most likely explanation. What did I even do to you?
thank you, that's all i wantI’m gonna give you room to breathe
I no make ignore status. Gotta up (lower?) my gameCatching up on 35 pages becomes so much moe bearable if you ignore Flower and Fuji beforehand
Reasoms?magic and ratchet town btw
TBD on cp and ultra
I don't remember it.also my read on watson might be a bit hasty but I thought the post where she said "all 4 are scum" was too bold for what ive come to see from her scum game. dont rly think watson cares about how shes perceived which is a good sign
This is a little disingenuous. His point is that she's relaxed enough to be making jokes like this - that indicates a certain level of confidence which Ekko is conflating with boldness. It doesn't have to be an actual read - it just has to be something that's uncharacteristic of her scum game. And without having seen the comment, I can't say I agree or not, but I do think his meta profile is reasonably accurate, insofar as scum Watson tends to turtle up a bit. She really doesn't enjoy playing that alignment.That all 4 are scum seemed like an obvious joke and not a read. Unless you think making jokes is too bold
Hmm. What's causing that, exactly?the tiltedness is partially because i don't really enjoy playing on here as much as i used to - it's really a chore
but i wanted to play mafia almost immediately, so
Fair enough. I know by and large it's not a post you'll want me to read you from, so I'll not consider it for now.we can go into that post game ratchet
I think it’s a very tame/easy joke to make is my point and in no way sticking your neck out lol. It’s what I consider pretty much a free post. But she actually opened the game with a ton of shit posts in a row if that’s something she’s not likely to do as scum.This is a little disingenuous. His point is that she's relaxed enough to be making jokes like this - that indicates a certain level of confidence which Ekko is conflating with boldness. It doesn't have to be an actual read - it just has to be something that's uncharacteristic of her scum game. And without having seen the comment, I can't say I agree or not, but I do think his meta profile is reasonably accurate, insofar as scum Watson tends to turtle up a bit. She really doesn't enjoy playing that alignment.
I have a lot of issue I need to work through if that’s what we’re doing right nowWe successfully turned this into a therapy session
Can't tell if the reason this sounds overexplainy/panicky is because of the rhyming or if it's genuinely just that wayYes. T'was me who said there is no scum among these people four.
Why do u not like it? What do you want more?
If you think I'm wrong, then who don't you like?
And if you think it's me, do you think it's TMI?
For you see the mafia are evil and cunning and clever.
What malice do you find in my meaningless endeavor?
Why?Kinda torn on that early Pqwerty stuff, the reason Magic susses the guy is pretty crap
@Magic why did you like this post?Lynch Pqwerty
This post gave me the ick.
Can someone summarize the other 7 pages?
That sort of premature town read imo tends to come from town who can't help but feel the way they do rather than TMIing scumWhy?
They were Crying last game you played thereWhos Pqwerty btw do I know them from WG?
YesSo Flower Has done nothing but been involved in shit posting and been incapable of doing nothing else bcz of the obsession for my vote on her.
DOES THAT SOUND LIKE A TOWN FLOWER?
Kinda torn on that early Pqwerty stuff, the reason Magic susses the guy is pretty crap but then his response here
Can't tell if the reason this sounds overexplainy/panicky is because of the rhyming or if it's genuinely just that way
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?