Game Official Ranked Xmas Mafia 2024 - Where Worlds Collide

[Flower]

Give me a target pool if you want me to use my role else I won’t use. If I kill another Town I don’t want all the blame for it.

 

[Hans Tweetenberg]

We should stop lynching people too. Pacifism is the answer

Best idea

 

[Aurelian]

can u post such updated reads? dont need to explain them or anything

Strong Town vibes:

• Ultra
• Me
• Fuji
• Magic

Town leaning vibes:

• Dr_Prof
• Lethal
• You
• Tweet

Unsure/could go either way

• Moving Flower down here cause I'm not strongly feeling she's her townie self and actively hitting Ekko who flipped town was not what I expected
• Guillo
• Chuck
• Alco

Scummy:

• Sparkles
• X
• Brutus
• Jigsaw
• Watson
• Rugrat

No idea:

• Alexis
• Alco
• Tpein
• everyone else

That doesn't answer my question - what am I lying about?

That I'm not voting Sparkles.

It was to Uktra, actually, but again I ask, what non-truth are you referring to?

The aforementioned above response.

I just quoted your post where you said that you were uncertain about her. Are you going to address that, or pretend it doesn't exist?
But that doesn't address my post. You haven't mentioned X anywhere. You say that you're trying to follow Poyser's legacy, but of the 5 scun reads he had, only one shows up in your scun list, the one that you express uncertainty about, with the other two people people he had no real read of. So we can duly conclude, then, that your PoE does not come from following Poyser's legacy. Thus, where does your PoE come from, and why did you try to pass it off as following Poyser's legacy, when you were not doing that?

My reads come from going at players who weren't town read by Poyser; including the nulls and ones he was uncertain about. Its not a difficult or strange concept to grasp. I get your trying to apply ulterior motives to my play because you like to be naughty like that but the truth is the truth. I never expressed "concern" about lynching Sparkles, as I said earlier you can attribute more of that to X who I was ignorant of being caught with mech.

Okay, but why not the other scum reads then too?
Again, why them, over the actual scum reads that were in the legacy you purport to follow.

I'm still fine with also lynching Watson and I don't really have much of an argument to argue why X shouldn't be lynched or suspected if he was tracked.

 

[Magic]

Give me a target pool if you want me to use my role else I won’t use. If I kill another Town I don’t want all the blame for it.

We're not using your role to kill people. Aint in the spirit, etc

 

[Chuck]

That’s not allowed btw. I have to give a followable PR. Not smth that’s gonna be broken first post for sure.

welp, if someone like Ekko who followed up something as ridiculous as haiku broke it, i could see anyone breaking it

 

[Ultra]

If ultra dies we should lynch Alexis for failing to protect ultra

bit presumptive isn't it

 

[Pqwerty]

Give me a target pool if you want me to use my role else I won’t use. If I kill another Town I don’t want all the blame for it.

The X (pending sparkles flip spews them wolf), Evans, Aurelian, everyone who u think melkor spewed wolf from your ISOing, seraphoenix, alco

 

[Ultra]

Don't make me defend the guy he's worthless but all they need to do is block him

 

[Magic]

bit presumptive isn't it

Bad joke

 

[Dr_Professor83]

We're not using your role to kill people. Aint in the spirit, etc

We can’t make them break it and be cheesy but I see no way using a role like that isn’t in the spirit of the game. If it wasn’t meant to be used at all it wouldn’t be in the game

 

[Magic]

Don't make me defend the guy he's worthless but all they need to do is block him

Nvm you're dumb

Read the context

 

[Chuck]

Yes but we have reason to believe we have an actual Vig.

yeah, i know, but still, this is another way to deal with poe if it's town, call it conditional vig or whatever, this is ability that kills, that's the point

someone can simply choose to say nothing but if they choose to say nothing, it's their concious decision to avoid PR which is scummy by itself imo

 

[Pqwerty]

The X (pending sparkles flip spews them wolf), Evans, Aurelian, everyone who u think melkor spewed wolf from your ISOing, seraphoenix, alco

actually maybe not Aurellian @Flower

 

[Flower]

@ Vig do your job regardless of my actions.

 

[Magic]

We can’t make them break it and be cheesy but I see no way using a role like that isn’t in the spirit of the game. If it wasn’t meant to be used at all it wouldn’t be in the game

Idk some people like prs

 

[Dr_Professor83]

She’s plenty allowed to PR PoE and if they do happen to break it they just happened to break it

 

[Aurelian]

You town read sparkles

I voted her

Then you tried calling me out for voting for her for ??? Reasons.



You then said this.

Pq confirmed mech and then you voted sparkles.

You only didnt move your vote off sparkles after mech was confirmed lol.

 

[Chuck]

The X (pending sparkles flip spews them wolf), Evans, Aurelian, everyone who u think melkor spewed wolf from your ISOing, seraphoenix, alco

guilo?

 

[Aurelian]

Oh yeah Sera hasn't posted in quite a bit either has he

 

[Ratchet]

That I'm not voting Sparkles.

Mind pointing out where I said that you wasn't voting for Sparkles?

My reads come from going at players who weren't town read by Poyser; including the nulls and ones he was uncertain about. Its not a difficult or strange concept to grasp. I get your trying to apply ulterior motives to my play because you like to be naughty like that but the truth is the truth. I never expressed "concern" about lynching Sparkles, as I said earlier you can attribute more of that to X who I was ignorant of being caught with mech.

Okay, but you initially explained your reads as following his legacy. But that isn't really true, is it, because you're focusing more on players that he had no read on (2 out of 3) than ones he had a scum read on (1 out of 3). In other words, if I were to be uncharitable, you're picking slots that are safe to push because Poyser wasn't shielding them. Now that may not necessarily be the case, but it would suggest that you have some other reasoning to compass how you got to those, unless you arbitrarily decided to focus more on players Poyser had no read on from his legacy? Also, I said that you were uncertain about Sparkles, and provided a quote from you admitting to that.

@Flower This really should be your next target. Pick the hardest form of poetry you can, too.

I'm still fine with also lynching Watson and I don't really have much of an argument to argue why X shouldn't be lynched or suspected if he was tracked.

But he's not even in your scum list.