• We're looking for artists. Direct message Dr. Watson for more info!

Game Official Ranked Xmas Mafia 2024 - Where Worlds Collide

Reader mode
Chuck said:
guilo?
Click to expand...
mm guilo is redeemable i think

like i can at least understand where they're coming from. i'd be sus too if a massive wave of my trs suddenly left the wagon on the person i was certain were outted lolcatting scum only to shift to the person i was less sure about
 
Ratchet said:
Mind pointing out where I said that you wasn't voting for Sparkles?
Click to expand...
No I think I just got confused between all the quotes and responses from you, Ultra, and Dr_Prof.
Ratchet said:
Okay, but you initially explained your reads as following his legacy. But that isn't really true, is it, because you're focusing more on players that he had no read on (2 out of 3) than ones he had a scum read on (1 out of 3). In other words, if I were to be uncharitable, you're picking slots that are safe to push because Poyser wasn't shielding them. Now that may not necessarily be the case, but it would suggest that you have some other reasoning to compass how you got to those, unless you arbitrarily decided to focus more on players Poyser had no read on from his legacy? Also, I said that you were uncertain about Sparkles, and provided a quote from you admitting to that.
Click to expand...
Your still trying to attribute an ulterior motive to my reads and votes. And don't kid yourself you have NEVER been charitable playing with me at any point in any game when it comes to mafia. I picked who I picked because I either didn't trust them to read them as town or saw them as scummy. Maybe it wasn't 100% accurate to say I was completely following Poyser's legacy but that's about it.

I have no need to play to appease you or Ultra or anyone else to try have you armchair analyze my play.
Ratchet said:
@Flower This really should be your next target. Pick the hardest form of poetry you can, too.
But he's not even in your scum list.
Click to expand...
She is not going to use it on me.
 
like @Chuck we're putting flower on the ppl who are either
(a) not posting enough to be solvable
(b) universally scumread with no redeeming qualities so if someone trs them we dont shoot
 
Aurelian said:
No I think I just got confused between all the quotes and responses from you, Ultra, and Dr_Prof.
Click to expand...
So you concede now then, that I didn't lie about anything?
Aurelian said:
Your still trying to attribute an ulterior motive to my reads and votes. And don't kid yourself you have NEVER been charitable playing with me at any point in any game when it comes to mafia. I picked who I picked because I either didn't trust them to read them as town or saw them as scummy.

I have no need to play to appease you or Ultra or anyone else to try have you armchair analyze my play.
Click to expand...
Well, I kind of have to be looking into motive. It's the whole point. Also, I said "if I were to be uncharitable" - I said nothing about extending any charity towards you.

Aurelian said:
She is not going to use it on me
Click to expand...
She should.
 
Pqwerty said:
like @Chuck we're putting flower on the ppl who are either
(a) not posting enough to be solvable
(b) universally scumread with no redeeming qualities so if someone trs them we dont shoot
Click to expand...
Well then you have a pretty long candidate list with the MIA and inactives.

Ratchet said:
So you concede now then, that I didn't lie about anything?
Click to expand...
I admit you didn't lie about that, yes.
Ratchet said:
Well, I kind of have to be looking into motive. It's the whole point. Also, I said "if I were to be uncharitable" - I said nothing about extending any charity towards you.
Click to expand...
Well then be a realist and admit you have never once done me any such favor that to begin with so frankly speaking bringing up that specific phrasing is pointless.
Ratchet said:
She should.
Click to expand...
She should not. Watson, X, and plenty of others are prefect fodder for it.
 
Aurelian said:
Well then you have a pretty long candidate list with the MIA and inactives.
Click to expand...
and unfortunately if they do not post and are not solvable then i will not miss them when our hands were forced to go this route.

@Flower also if there's any intersection between ppl who are universally sr'd and inactive and spewed mafia by melkor that might be a good green light (Evans)
 
Ultra said:
You ever going to explain your scum read on me?

Duck out again and you're done.
Click to expand...
Im not explaining shit.

I dont wanna deal with you, i e read how you treat others, how you mock them and gaslight them, i dont like you and i dint wanna deal with you, so do what you gotta do.
 
Pqwerty said:
mm guilo is redeemable i think

like i can at least understand where they're coming from. i'd be sus too if a massive wave of my trs suddenly left the wagon on the person i was certain were outted lolcatting scum only to shift to the person i was less sure about
Click to expand...

Pqwerty said:
like @Chuck we're putting flower on the ppl who are either
(a) not posting enough to be solvable
(b) universally scumread with no redeeming qualities so if someone trs them we dont shoot
Click to expand...

idk, i liked him early on but recently he feels icky for some reason

also, like, flower has her own reads and all, just don't pick someone who's town read by 90% of the thread and it's cool
 
.guillo said:
Im not explaining shit.

I dont wanna deal with you, i e read how you treat others, how you mock them and gaslight them, i dont like you and i dint wanna deal with you, so do what you gotta do.
Click to expand...
If you don’t want to explain it to him can you explain it to me?
 
Reader mode
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top