• We're looking for artists. Direct message Dr. Watson for more info!

Game Warcraft 3: The Full Story

Also prof did deserve his win, I mean the guy was top lynch candidate for 3 cycles back to back and managed to talk his way out of them, thats not his role saving him but his threadplay.
He did whine and manipulate though so it was off putting. If he gets lynched I don’t try and shoot there twice and maybe we see a different result.
 
Yo I just had an idea

It seems like some people really want to play mafia seriously and some people really don’t so instead of just having one big mafia section we should split it up into 2 different modes with 2 different sets of goals and expectations

The first mode would be “for fun” mafia and the second mode would be called “for glory” mafia

In for fun the people are there to just have a fun time, maybe do some trolling and some ate, etc. some games might contain a little alcohol but think of it like you’re just having a fun time with your friends at a party playing a little mafia

And in for glory it’s all serious mafia players who want high level competition and no nonsense. Think of this as mafia for the purists. We could even do a ranking system where people could compare themselves and compete for who is the best one here

I really think there should be some sort of delineation between the sections cuz otherwise you’ll end up with ppl who have the wrong expectations for their section. This would prevent scrubs joining ranked games and crying about everyone being too serious, or sweats joining a for fun game and complaining that it’s not serious enough

Food for thought
 
I predicted magic was scum D1, I'm actually 2 good

Also the only reason I shot @Grammaton was because I was worried he'd start flavor solving me becoming SK

Lol
 
Maybe In hindsight I shouldve made prof killable in final 4 I guess but lets not act like Prof was this menace to the game when Sparkles could deal with him, he was lynchable, when kills on him stop him from doing anything,etc.

Prof didnt make Poyser and Charles and Gad out themselves.
 
Yo I just had an idea

It seems like some people really want to play mafia seriously and some people really don’t so instead of just having one big mafia section we should split it up into 2 different modes with 2 different sets of goals and expectations

The first mode would be “for fun” mafia and the second mode would be called “for glory” mafia

In for fun the people are there to just have a fun time, maybe do some trolling and some ate, etc. some games might contain a little alcohol but think of it like you’re just having a fun time with your friends at a party playing a little mafia

And in for glory it’s all serious mafia players who want high level competition and no nonsense. Think of this as mafia for the purists. We could even do a ranking system where people could compare themselves and compete for who is the best one here

I really think there should be some sort of delineation between the sections cuz otherwise you’ll end up with ppl who have the wrong expectations for their section. This would prevent scrubs joining ranked games and crying about everyone being too serious, or sweats joining a for fun game and complaining that it’s not serious enough

Food for thought
There's a ranked section lol, this is already a thing
 
Also prof did deserve his win, I mean the guy was top lynch candidate for 3 cycles back to back and managed to talk his way out of them, thats not his role saving him but his threadplay.
Missing just a few key role related details here that enabled him to be able to talk his way out of lynches in the first place :bosque:
 
Well you didnt really bother anyway so
Then you should’ve spoken up about it. Quite frankly when I see the first message in scum chat along the lines of “oh we’re getting fucking lethal” it doesn’t fill anyone with optimism. It’s ok, I just won’t sub next time. You can have magic going awol or get fang.
 
You created the previously unseen scenario of no faction being able to win in a 4 faction endgame also. If you want to be insulted, i cant do anything about that
If they lynched cult this phase or the phase before or the phase before that Mango or Lethal couldve won.
 
As you edited this in afterward, ill again say that thats the problem- nobody should have to play real life issue simulator, and nobody ahould be introducing that kind of real life angle into the game in the first place. Thats got nothing to do with being 'uber try hard' and everything to do with not having that stuff weaponised against you

Nothing strictly incorrect here.

My point is about the magnitude of response. Even if you're justified to complain, stuff like players chortling sarcastically in dead chat about how he's faking when he subbed out etc. isn't a great look.
 
Yo I just had an idea

It seems like some people really want to play mafia seriously and some people really don’t so instead of just having one big mafia section we should split it up into 2 different modes with 2 different sets of goals and expectations

The first mode would be “for fun” mafia and the second mode would be called “for glory” mafia

In for fun the people are there to just have a fun time, maybe do some trolling and some ate, etc. some games might contain a little alcohol but think of it like you’re just having a fun time with your friends at a party playing a little mafia

And in for glory it’s all serious mafia players who want high level competition and no nonsense. Think of this as mafia for the purists. We could even do a ranking system where people could compare themselves and compete for who is the best one here

I really think there should be some sort of delineation between the sections cuz otherwise you’ll end up with ppl who have the wrong expectations for their section. This would prevent scrubs joining ranked games and crying about everyone being too serious, or sweats joining a for fun game and complaining that it’s not serious enough

Food for thought
How about just fuck off like you keep saying you're going to every 5 minutes
 
He did whine and manipulate though so it was off putting. If he gets lynched I don’t try and shoot there twice and maybe we see a different result.
I’m going to shoot down that notion that I whined.

I told Luka that me not making jokes was NAI toward the end of one day when he was 1 away from hammer at the time.

And the very last cycle I lost my cool in my argument with Mango a little bit.

I really don’t believe I was playing some heavily AtE reliant game. I was doing my best to lock in around it and keep my general temperament as a background issue.

I apologize for any leaks that did happen but I don’t believe I whined my way through this game.
 
You created the previously unseen scenario of no faction being able to win in a 4 faction endgame also. If you want to be insulted, i cant do anything about that
Pot gets lynched, Lethal shoots Cata and Mango shoots Lethal Mango wins.
Lethal gets lynched Mango doesnt shoot anyone and then him and Cata lynch Pot Mango wins.
Pot gets lynched and Mango shoots Cata and Lethal shoots Mango Lethal wins.
 
Then you should’ve spoken up about it. Quite frankly when I see the first message in scum chat along the lines of “oh we’re getting fucking lethal” it doesn’t fill anyone with optimism. It’s ok, I just won’t sub next time. You can have magic going awol or get fang.

And i did speak up about it. Again, it was in the chat. How long did i ask you and gad to get your claims ready for? The absolute bare minimum for one of these games - was i supposed to do it for you?
 
Back
Top