Oh so now this thread active huh?
Now this thread active huh?
Now this thread active huh?
Rdk is the beacon of activity, you are to blame for this game going the way it didOh so now this thread active huh?
Now this thread active huh?
Blow it out your ass@Arne Slot have some class and dont insult the dead town who was rightfully stating that you were doing nothing but tunnel the other dead town for the better part of the game. Its in especially poor taste when it comes from a non town SK. At the very least I steered the votes towards RDK when he was tied 3-3 where once again your vote was parked on him and helped get him lynched after others followed.
This me be being polite with you here but dont you ever insult me again.
Where Sparkles at and what's her explanation for not submiting any actions after putting herself into the sub slot over Ratchet?
Hey that my line you petty with a prior.shes a petty with a prior. not the first time she just ducked like that. @Sparkles we're gonna lock u up. the makoto pfp will lighten ur sentense but wont save u
His death really did doom us all. He had a really good role.I blame it on Ekko getting modkilled like a muppet
I'm looking forward to the challenge and improving my game accordingly.i wasn't rly suspicious of you, i cannot claim that. i was wary of the reason given to town read you, but not necessarily suspicious of you myself
now that people saw you as both town and mafia, your journey will become harder for future games ;)
Yeah it's not realistic to expect your subs to manage replacements for you. You asked for one sub, got one before I responded (and it wasn't like you were waiting a day), and then never asked again. I think most would agree that it takes little to no effort for you to ask - to be expecting me as a potential replacement to be monitoring the game and then tell you who I should be replacing is a bit silly imo.The thing there is you didn't say anything. You could easily have seen Sig wasn't holding up and said something and I'd have put you back in
Why tf did you think you gave the SK a double kill? That isn't how your role works at allI thought Rugrats was the hero that Gotham deserved, but turns out that that it was the one that we didn’t need right now, and so it was hunted.
A watchless protector
A dark wrestler.
Hey that my line you petty with a prior.
While I believe there was no personal agenda on your end, I think you really let down your own game here. You made a post about how the game couldn't work without activity. How could you not make an effort to get ratchet into the game? It's really poorThe thing there is you didn't say anything. You could easily have seen Sig wasn't holding up and said something and I'd have put you back in
Why tf did you think you gave the SK a double kill? That isn't how your role works at all
I won't bother asking why you refilled an inactive slot either. The answer is probably the same anyway
I was waiting until post game to ask why I wasn't replaced in, would you rather I start complaining before the game ended? Maybe I should just enter the game thread and start it then during the day? It wasn't until Day 4 that I realised she really wasn't actually going to do anything to address the activity.Looks like you were just waiting until post-game to have a moan, you had days to address this with the host if you sensed the need, which obviously you did
Think you mean I was unluckyYou were lucky, i tried to kill you night 2.
I blame it on Ekko getting modkilled like a muppet
wanna know wats funny, i initially only wrote my role in the claim, not characterI thought Rugrats was the hero that Gotham deserved, but turns out that that it was the one that we didn’t need right now, and so it was hunted.
A watchless protector
A dark wrestler.
Hey that my line you petty with a prior.
It was patently obvious that there was an activity issue and you were on the rep list.I was waiting until post game to ask why I wasn't replaced in, would you rather I start complaining before the game ended? Maybe I should just enter the game thread and start it then during the day? It wasn't until Day 4 that I realised she really wasn't actually going to do anything to address the activity.
Idk what you expect tbh. He's not going to post in the game as a sub. He signed up for the rep list. We needed reps. Like what is the criticism here? That he didn't message sky telling her he can rep in? He already did that by signing up to be a sub.It was patently obvious that there was an activity issue and you were on the rep list.
I think it's absurd that sky didn't ask you if you could rep in but I also don't know why you're coming in here after the fact whining about not being put in the game. What good does it do now?
I'm asking "why didn't you ask me if I could sub in". Because I would like an explanation. Your contention is that I should have been proactive, or whatever. It's silly, because from my point of view, there is the host, the coach, and dead players, all who have more information on the status of who needs replacing exactly, and if none of them have prompted a replacement search (in the case of the latter, suggested to the host to do so) then I can only assume it's in hand. Until it becomes clear that it isnt. So while I could have offered, I didn't, and that doesn't change the fact that the host was negligent at best (and I personally suspect deliberately spiteful, but whatever).It was patently obvious that there was an activity issue and you were on the rep list.
I think it's absurd that sky didn't ask you if you could rep in but I also don't know why you're coming in here after the fact whining about not being put in the game. What good does it do now?
I dun fuked upRdk is the beacon of activity, you are to blame for this game going the way it did
Waiting 5 days for an explanation when nothing can be done is just as silly, you knew the game was dead. It's not your responsibility to be proactive but it's a bit pointless complaining if you weren't. Do you want her to go back in time?I'm asking "why didn't you ask me if I could sub in". Because I would like an explanation. Your contention is that I should have been proactive, or whatever. It's silly, because from my point of view, there is the host, the coach, and dead players, all who have more information on the status of who needs replacing exactly, and if none of them have prompted a replacement search (in the case of the latter, suggested to the host to do so) then I can only assume it's in hand. Until it becomes clear that it isnt. So while I could have offered, I didn't, and that doesn't change the fact that the host was negligent at best (and I personally suspect deliberately spiteful, but whatever).