"Mathematics is magical and calcers somehow find a magic way to always make biggatons appear"
Here my calc is linked. Please take note of the fact my calc is linked and referred to as "life wiping."
http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Skyrim:Storm_Call[ A Shout to the skies, a cry to the clouds, that awakens the destructive force of Skyrim's lightning. 0:46 A single shout creates a horizon-spanning storm from the top of the Throat of the World...
www.fanverse.org
Now to "debunk" this, he brings up that nukes can part clouds.
Yes. Thousands to millions of tons of TNT going off at once in a weapon so powerful that even testing one in the desert is controversial somehow disproves that parting clouds will always get super high yields.
Note also above that he said that cloud parting gets in the megaton range but megaton scale weapons somehow disproves this.
This one is quite argument from belief about physics not always applying to fiction (there are some cloud feats where you can blatantly see the clouds moving and retaining the same structure, regardless of how this would look under IRL physics), but I remember when debating him on SB and bringing up similar claims for the side he was arguing he ignored it.
Now we have some more blatantly disingenuous arguments from Xcano. As a final example, he brings up Pearl moving clouds to be "Hiroshima levels." Note how he posts a link to the video and not the calc itself.
Because Pearl moving a cloud is something I also calced back in the day, and it had a yield of 0.6 tons of TNT.
A song by Pearl and how I feel about most Steven Universe debates. 1:23 Pearl has moved clouds before (nephelokinesis), but it hasn't been as easy to calc. This ones nice and clear cut. First, the distance between Pearl and the clouds. They're...
www.fanverse.org
Now for someone claiming that every cloud feat is an insane giga/teraton scale feat, it's quite strange that he didn't link the Pearl calc, when he had no problem linking the Skyrim one. The SU calc is actually
older than the Storm Call one, and would have been more than accessable. I really wonder why he didn't mention this? Or other calcs myself and others did where the yield was either well below kilotons even for cumulonimbus, and times they weren't even a ton of TNT?