Who and what is that again?
- We're looking for artists. Direct message Dr. Watson for more info!
Circus of Humorous & Humiliating Arguments Part 3: Laugh Hard with a Vengence
- Thread starter Masterblack06
- Start date
- Status
Arch Curate Vrythur is the falmer vampire (who is the second last non corrupted falmer) who guarded the Bow of Auri-El and wanted revenge on Auri-El. You fight him in Dawnguard and during the fight, he destroys pillars and destroys the Chantry of Auri-El (or half of it at least).Who and what is that again?
I'll let you look at this with a good dose of Occams Razor before I tell you why SB has "totally debunked that this is an explosion."
They do despite "breaks the story" doesn't even mean anything considering if it came from the author himself, how DOES that break the story by any means?
It's why I end up basically laughing and then basically shaking my head any time it's brought up, especially when it comes to series that basically tell you what happened, show you the aftermath and then tell you exactly why it happened and how.
See SB actually believing Heracles has no innate durability outside of God Hand when we explicitly see that Gilgamesh's GoB can't even fully go through him despite their absurd destructive power meanwhile Artoria's massive Excalibur Mana Burst can literally destroy parts of him or burn him into cinders.
Oh yeah, I remember how they believe Alduin can't be anything the story stated he is despite the story basically all but stating that's exactly how he is. Or that Dragon Shouts can't bend reality to do what they can... despite Dragon Shouts literally do that very thing and you can even hear Dragons actually speak before they do what they do.
It's honestly funny how bankrupt SB can be when it comes to downplaying the Nasuverse or TES simply because "Shit isn't happening the way it's described down to the letter" or basically cherrypicking shit... but then when it gets to Bleach? ...Just see how they treat Yhwach and that's only part of that absurd madness.
I've pointed out time and time again that this has all happened in game and you can see it onscreen, and backed up by the omniscient narrator and word of god. Based on onscreen feats alone, Alduin is already small continent level at minimum, if not way higher.
Then as I've said before, they do a complete 180 with ESO because it's super flashy and try to say it's not as canon as the cinematics made to advertise it (which ironically still have enough feats to clear all of MHA and RWBY sans the Brothers).
Then the same people who say that Dagon isn't even city level and all of TES's high end stuff is based on ingame books turn around and say that the Brothers from RWBY are universal because of the campfire story that Qrow said in S4. Before we even knew what the Brothers were capable of or if they were even a thing. The same story which just said they made the oceans and life on Remnant.
Universe level oceans
They actually believe the Brother Gods created the Afterlife and thus, they are Universal from that despite them never stating they created the Afterlife or anything. Nothing has even stated they created the Planet Remnant at all and how it's been described in their episode, they literally just decided to head there and create life one day so...
The Brother Gods are clearly multiversal+ reality warpers and thus, Nasuland and Kamachiland are no more.
The Brothers vs Exalted
What even is Exalted again? A series of RPGs I think?
Now I get what people are going to say in opposition to this:
Feats > Statements
Now that is 100% true and how we operate but at the same time, if a statement primarily goes along with the feat even if the feat doesn't 100% correlate with the feat itself(i.e. We allow Solar System Super Perfect Cell because even though he doesn't destroy the Solar System with his attack, basically everything else lines up that he basically would anyway), then the statement should still remain true.
If a statement cannot be proven in any possible way, that's when it should be completely ignored and funny enough, that fits alot of series SB wanks it's ass off for.
Feats > Statements
Now that is 100% true and how we operate but at the same time, if a statement primarily goes along with the feat even if the feat doesn't 100% correlate with the feat itself(i.e. We allow Solar System Super Perfect Cell because even though he doesn't destroy the Solar System with his attack, basically everything else lines up that he basically would anyway), then the statement should still remain true.
If a statement cannot be proven in any possible way, that's when it should be completely ignored and funny enough, that fits alot of series SB wanks it's ass off for.
A tabletop game that SB wanks to high heaven because of gameplay mechanics. Apparently it got so bad that SB had to step in and ban Exalted debates, but the same beliefs still remain.
Ironically enough, even the creators of Exalted said lore > gameplay but SB ignores that.
statements are fine as long as they are from a reliable source i.e extremely knowledgeable character in universe, omniscient narrator, author statements that don't blatantly contradict things etc
transformers is heavily propped up by a lot of obscure statements but in just about every case I've made sure to find multiple examples from different sources to corroborate thebibformation
transformers is heavily propped up by a lot of obscure statements but in just about every case I've made sure to find multiple examples from different sources to corroborate thebibformation
I like to use feats & statements together to get the fullest picture. And statements can help tell you what's happening with purely visual feats (confirming the Multiversal feats in Gurren Lagann are multiversal and to confirm the things in TES do infact happen the way they are shown to).
Yhwach (Bleach) vs Goddess Rhongomyniad (Fate/ Grand Order)
This is because Rhongo isn't always active. Just like the game, Rhongo only uses its true power upon Agravain's request. Roman senses the mana skyrocketing and the singularity's collapse accelerates. This stops because Ozymandias destroys the tower. The movie says the same thing. In quite...
forums.spacebattles.com @Xhominid The Fool So this means it's solar system-galaxy level right?
in TF's case we very rarely if ever see any of this happen (because the stories tend to revolve around more down to earth subject matter) so I rely a lot on statements. Unicron's strongest form for example appeared for about 3-5 panels at best
maybe a few more scattered throughout other chapters So what I'm hearing is... that one narrator statement about Othinus creating infinite worlds may be legit? (well there's another statement or two that support it iirc but you get what I meanin TF's case we very rarely if ever see any of this happen (because the stories tend to revolve around more down to earth subject matter) so I rely a lot on statements. Unicron's strongest form for example appeared for about 3-5 panels at best
)Multiversal+ To Aru here we come
idk depends on context and i can't be fucked to read toaru
unicron strength comes from a number of things the main one being we know everything he has ever done in canon is while he was weakened because of Primus Trick (tm) at the dawn of time
so Astral Unicron that ate the old existence is just much stronger to an unknown degree
unicron strength comes from a number of things the main one being we know everything he has ever done in canon is while he was weakened because of Primus Trick (tm) at the dawn of time
so Astral Unicron that ate the old existence is just much stronger to an unknown degree
Mr.OMG
Distinguished
Bro, take it higher. If you take all statements into account, the ToAru is far superior to the usual megaverse+So what I'm hearing is... that one narrator statement about Othinus creating infinite worlds may be legit? (well there's another statement or two that support it iirc but you get what I mean
Multiversal+ To Aru here we come
If To Aru becomes megaversal in any way you know for sure I'm giving it the Numidium treatment 
- Status