its still fostering an idea of preventing v/v violeence and ruining an avenue for wolves to push. first second or 67th, if a player looks easily miskillable from a wolf pov they dont want to say something that negates that avanue to miskill
I dont think this analysis is airtight, and my inner cynic feels theres a decent chance that this could be a form of reflected commentary as to what youre doing here, this is to say, youre playing peacemaker and we the audience should interpret that as benign on your behalf
Just a theory