• We're looking for artists. Direct message Dr. Watson for more info!

Game Ranked Hero Killer Mafia

@EkkoLoJinx

First off, do not compare me to Alexis, that is actually incredibly insulting. Then secondly, I can acknowledge I fucked up but you are one of the last people to point fingers given your history as well.

Pot to kettle.
the difference between you and alexis is youve been playing for years but this is his first year. im more keen to be more lenient with him than you

if you're not willing to change im gonna have to sign off on the ban with the rest. i dont remember ever doubling down on a lie on my first years of mafia so bringing history is irrelevant

you're no stranger to how this game works so you should have no excuses fang.
 
the difference between you and alexis is youve been playing for years but this is his first year. im more keen to be more lenient with him than you

if you're not willing to change im gonna have to sign off on the ban with the rest. i dont remember ever doubling down on a lie on my first years of mafia so bringing history is irrelevant

you're no stranger to how this game works so you should have no excuses fang.
I'm not talking about any of that, I'm saying its pretty ironic when people wanted you banned or restricted from games because of your behavior being obnoxious and trolling. You were even modkilled in a more recent game earlier this year for doing something stupid like that so I really would appreciate you have a bit of humility, your record is certainly not clean, especially with you antagonizing certain players as of late.

Like I said I admitted to fucking up.
 
I'm not talking about any of that, I'm saying its pretty ironic when people wanted you banned or restricted from games because of your behavior being obnoxious and trolling. You were even modkilled in a more recent game earlier this year for doing something stupid like that so I really would appreciate you have a bit of humility, your record is certainly not clean, especially with you antagonizing certain players as of late.

Like I said I admitted to fucking up.
This is another example of you bringing unrelated topics and people into things by way of defence of your own actions. Ekko's earlier modkill has nothing to do with this game, as I said before, a simple "yeah, I messed up" is sufficient. The "but he/she did (x) and (y) is unnecessary".
 
This is another example of you bringing unrelated topics and people into things by way of defence of your own actions. Ekko's earlier modkill has nothing to do with this game, as I said before, a simple "yeah, I messed up" is sufficient. The "but he/she did (x) and (y) is unnecessary".
If only you actually would read my post.
 
Reposting this here so staff sees my opinion on the matter but

I personally feel Alexis should be given one more chance after the AI ban is actually in place. Being bad at the game isn’t really punishable otherwise a lot of people fall into that category tbh and I mean no disrespect.
 
Reposting this here so staff sees my opinion on the matter but

I personally feel Alexis should be given one more chance after the AI ban is actually in place. Being bad at the game isn’t really punishable otherwise a lot of people fall into that category tbh and I mean no disrespect.
Yeah I felt disturbed with his AI posting but I think he should get 1 more chance if he decides to get coached (with me) by someone lol
 
Reposting this here so staff sees my opinion on the matter but

I personally feel Alexis should be given one more chance after the AI ban is actually in place. Being bad at the game isn’t really punishable otherwise a lot of people fall into that category tbh and I mean no disrespect.

blud has had like 10 though
 
Asked google AI to give me their reads over the first 25 pages of the game. Didn't specify post count per page. Here's what I got:


Here is my assessment based only on the content within those initial pages. Please remember the strong caveats from before: this is Day 1, reads are highly speculative, based on limited interactions, without meta knowledge, and subjective.

Players Leaning Town:

  1. Fujishiro: Very active from the start, asking questions, engaging with others' points, and trying to build cases or understand motivations. Seems genuinely invested in solving.
  2. Atsumori: Also quite active and analytical. Puts out thoughts, asks clarifying questions, and seems focused on understanding the game state.
  3. Arne Slot: Engages consistently, questions players, and participates in discussions. Their contributions feel aimed at moving the game forward and finding scum.
  4. Sharter Holmes: Seems actively trying to parse information, asks good questions, and contributes to the flow of discussion. Comes across as a Town player trying to figure things out.
  5. Grammaton: Posts feel analytical and focused. Asks pointed questions and seems to be genuinely evaluating responses.
  6. Mlraka: Active participant, offers reads and rationale, engages with others. Seems Town-motivated.
  7. Aurelian: Vocal and engaged, putting out reads and questioning others. Seems invested in the Town cause.
  8. Luka: Contributes constructively, asks questions, and participates in the main discussion threads. Seems Town.
  9. Stick: Engages with discussion points, offers thoughts, seems generally aligned with trying to solve.
Players Leaning Mafia:

  1. Lappland: While active, some of their posting feels a bit performative or overly aggressive on certain points early on. The way they push certain narratives or individuals feels slightly less organic than some of the strong Town leans. This is a very tentative read, as strong Townies can also be aggressive, but something feels slightly off.
  2. BradLand: Their interaction style feels a little different. Some posts seem slightly deflectionary or less focused on direct analysis compared to the strong Town leans. Could just be playstyle, but marking as a slight suspicion.
Players Who Are Hard to Read / Neutral:

  • Lethal: Active and posting, but the style is a bit more chaotic/memey initially. Hard to pin down alignment based purely on this early engagement. Could easily be Town.
  • Cataclysm: Participating and asking questions, but hasn't developed a strong alignment signal yet within these pages. Standard early game play.
  • Alexis2282AE: Present and posting, but less of a driving force in the main discussions compared to the most active players. Not enough distinct behaviour to lean either way yet.
  • PepeBoi: Contributing, but hasn't stood out strongly in either direction based on the first 25 pages.
  • Hayumi: Similar to Alexis and PepeBoi - participating but hasn't shown strong alignment tells yet.
  • jay23: Relatively less active compared to some others in this initial phase. Difficult to get a solid read.
  • Boquise: Posting, but hasn't taken a central role or displayed strongly indicative behaviour yet.
Summary:

The game started actively with many players jumping into discussions. Fujishiro, Atsumori, Arne Slot, Sharter Holmes, and Grammaton stand out as particularly engaged in what feels like genuine Town problem-solving. My tentative Mafia leans (Lappland, BradLand) are based on subtle interaction differences or pushes that could be interpreted as non-Town, but this is highly speculative Day 1 stuff. Several players remain neutral reads due to less distinctive posting or lower activity in this initial slice of the game.

Again, treat these reads with extreme caution – they are based on very limited, early-game information!
 
@Lappland the AI scum read you, skill issue imo

on a more serious note, the AI probably read alot more of the game and is more informed than I think, so it's possible he saw some flips or some people talk about those reads and just sheeped those views. Lappland and Bradland being scum read is essentially what many people did early day 1.

now this is not to defend the use of AI, i still think it's cheating. i agree that a warning to alexis is fine since this is the first time the AI is banned in OLF/WG
 
Back
Top