Of what?
Of what?Give me an example?
Anything that can show me and him being partnered ofcOf what?
Thought you didn't have any reads you wanted to push and that was the whole reason you were riding with me on sparkles and ultra on soul to begin with instead of pushing your own direction?I mean, I did talk about Saber earlier too. It's not like that vote is the only time I mentioned him as a lynch. Earlier in the day as well I said about voting him, don't think I actually moved my vote there but I'd made my intentions pretty clear.
Thinking about it, if they were all held by scum RDK's role wouldn't make any sense. So if I believe that then I probably have to accept that they're in other people's hands. I would assume that there is a flavour angle to this, but I don't know enough to say it.Pretty sure they’re just there to be collected by someone. They don’t do anything otherwise we’d probably be told what they do when we are told we have them
I never said I didn't have reads, I said I didn't, and don't, have all that much conviction. Also, I wasn't just riding with Ultra in regards to Soul - I thought he could be scum from my own read of him, I just said it after Ultra. In your case, the only read on Sparkles I had was that she felt different to the last game, but that wasn't enough for me to say it means she's town.Thought you didn't have any reads you wanted to push and that was the whole reason you were riding with me on sparkles and ultra on soul to begin with instead of pushing your own direction?
if they r all given to scum all that tells me is saber's team doesnt have anybody who knows the flavor, which basically removes like... 1-2 players from contentionYeah, the one who owns this is an antagonist. So my thinking here is why block flavour claiming if Tweet has been subversive with it? I don't really see why you'd claim having the item as scum though, except for WIFOM purposes, in which case you were probably told to claim it for that reason.
Hmmmm. Think I would still lean towards lynching here.
That's not what I said. I could find posts and construe a reason for them to be partnered, but what I actually said was that I didn't see any reason that you couldn't be partnered, as in, nothing about your posts or his struck me as something two scum mates wouldn't do together. So what you're asking me for is actually to prove a claim I haven't made.Anything that can show me and him being partnered ofc
In this context, Poyser would be Shionne, the only character who would have one that isn't scum.if they r all given to scum all that tells me is saber's team doesnt have anybody who knows the flavor, which basically removes like... 1-2 players from contention
inclined to say town has some and its like the elden ring where scum gets the runes of townies they kill
that said i like the theory of them being scum only. wud fit real nice with posyer being one
how much time we have left? id rather stick to soul. much more confident on him being scum given we just played a game with him
vote lynch soul
unvote
Vote Lynch Soulkiller
Vote aurelian
Lets get it
Vote: Aurelian
works for me, I have work to do!
vote soulkiller
I can see that.
If he’s the watcher this is on you.
Vote Soul
I'm not actually so confident on this that I'd want to lynch into his claim without giving him a night or so. Kinda surprised to see Ultra/Ekko just shrug off the claim and proceed with lynching anyway.
On the topic of Saber, I have noticed how disengaged he's been in comparison to recent town games, and like CP says, he just dropped off entirely. Even when he was here though, he felt lacking to me. Think I might just vote there
Vote: Saber
vote saber
Won’t be voting soul today
Vote lynch Emil.
vote ekko
Anyway
vote saber
Vote Lynch Saber
Yeah, sorry if this isnt helpful, but vote Sparkles
Why are you town reading mePoyser
Aurelian
Alexis2282AE
Emil
Ratchet
Tempest
Luka
Ultra
Lethal
Chairman Nibel
Yoho
Sharter Holmes
Fujishiro
Soulkiller
Sparkles
RDK
Grammaton
I will say I don't like the timing of this post. Feels really self conscious, and not what I would associate with a townie who has just rolled over because he doesn't want to deal with it.Can you stop the cap? who conceded? you are literally mislynching here for??? no reason.
It's less so seeing a plausible angle, more inventing one, because nothing from my end would naturally lead you there, most of all my personality, which is to typically avoid taking larger gambles early.But sure I'm not gonna hold it against you for not wanting to go Soul right away here so much as I can see an angle here where you could be scum, based on the play from both of you in relation to each other. Like I can see you feeling a bit obliged to hop on that Soul wagon while keeping your options open, and knowing that if it does come down to it he has a watcher claim to fall back on. Bits and pieces like you shrug wanting Ekko's claim, Soul not reacting to your push, etc inform this perspective
I was the first, though, no?Maybe if you were the only one who attempted to save him in such a fashion.
He literally pinged me, saw it and addressed it. Has nothing to do with timing.I will say I don't like the timing of this post. Feels really self conscious, and not what I would associate with a townie who has just rolled over because he doesn't want to deal with it.
I don't need everyone to say it - just enough to be convincing that it falls apart. And I would also need a good fallback wagon to lean on too. So you would think I'd be really interested in pushing that, no?Counterpoint: You'd prefer not bussing if possible, so that's going to be weighted into the equation if say you see Me/Ekko shouting full speed ahead. Also, while it does take your credit off the table, should go without saying you can reasonably defend yourself there. But yeah I can see how this would be a misplay if say everyone came together and decided Watcher was bullshit, just think you can reasonably anticipate that wouldn't be the case except for a few devout crazies
No it means I didn't feel the need to say "oh, CP unvoted, guess he's no longer interested in pushing her, will leave it at that".You didn't feel the need to say anything? So you don't really care what happens? How is this a defense? That's the case!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?