• We're looking for artists. Direct message Dr. Watson for more info!

Game Ranked Wildlife Mafia

i cant track this part the most - what makes ral and fang automatically bad in a poyser town world exactly?
Positionally they didn't have much of a reason to oppose the Poyser lynch - it reads to me like their positions were somewhat pulled from thin air. And if I consider that the wagons were town v town, the main consideration I expect low confidence scum to have is how they look good off of it. Naturally, defending Poyser does that - better than defending Gad because if they vote against Poyser, they risk him sniping them. For some players, like you, I would expect you to secure the Poyser lynch because you can just say you defer to someone else to get it, but I would see those three as more likely to get nervous about it.

In order, I would say it applies to Watson the most, then Ral, then Fang. Fang is a bit of an outlier - I don't love how he was so sure Poyser was Town, but I don't really think as scum he's that low confidence, so I could see him being town the most.
 
This is the sort of thing that makes it hard to read you Town btw Poyser, like you have to be completely ignoring the premise of my argument to make a disingenuous "gotcha", which reads more as you trying to make something happen rather than it be a legitimate train of thought. After being wrong on Gad I'm happy to take a step back, but for me to find you here you're going to have to extend more honesty to your arguments I think.
ok let's leave the hypothetic here for a sec, i understand that post was about what if posyer flips town

i wanna know what you think, do you think he's town or not?
 
On the surface of that, there does seem to be equity between lethal and fang but im not sure I'd put too much stock into it. I think there's numerous factors at play here, one being him not wanting to just join a the leading wagon onto a mislynch (assuming fang is town) and two, me being active in the thread at the time and lethal being wary of me, and probably not wanting to go against me and create a back and forth
How would I be knowing it was a mislynch? I’m not wary of you or anybody anymore. Champs taught me that much. You wanna play let’s play.

bit of a rollercoaster when you put it all together. it seems like he's kind of looking for an opportunity to vote elsewhere
Uh yes? Why would I vote where I didn’t agree on the direction? If I leaned wolf on him I’d not hesitate to vote.

OMGUS sure but wow, this sure does have the makings of a wolf Poyser this game. Prance about all day 1 not wanting to get too connected to anyone, being very careful in his play when engaging with gram/ratchet, appeases CP out of caution, then fence sits on fang and exploits the first opportunity to someone else other than he and fang, knowing full well he could then slime up my name for starting the gad wagon. He has ekko pocketed and can have him run around.
 
ok let's leave the hypothetic here for a sec, i understand that post was about what if posyer flips town

i wanna know what you think, do you think he's town or not?
Yesterday I gave an 8 out of 10 for confidence of him being scum. Now I would say 6 - I still stand by parts of what I said yesterday, but it's not as though I'm confident on it any longer. So to answer your question directly, I would lean scum, sort of...
 
Positionally they didn't have much of a reason to oppose the Poyser lynch - it reads to me like their positions were somewhat pulled from thin air. And if I consider that the wagons were town v town, the main consideration I expect low confidence scum to have is how they look good off of it. Naturally, defending Poyser does that - better than defending Gad because if they vote against Poyser, they risk him sniping them. For some players, like you, I would expect you to secure the Poyser lynch because you can just say you defer to someone else to get it, but I would see those three as more likely to get nervous about it.

In order, I would say it applies to Watson the most, then Ral, then Fang. Fang is a bit of an outlier - I don't love how he was so sure Poyser was Town, but I don't really think as scum he's that low confidence, so I could see him being town the most.
i dont agree ratchet, because them defending posyer means they are going against you, cp, and gram, unless you think for some reason poyser scares them more than the 3 of you combined, which is pretty meme at this point, this logic doesnt track with what a weak scum wud be thinking of

it doesnt take a strong scum to realize that poyser's wagon was a freebie and all they needed is vote on it given you guys are taking credit for it anyway
 
Also @Tempest i town vibe you because from my perspective you’re asking the right questions. Hard to explain in detail and by no means an exact science as I am shit on reading you. Sorry for not answering earlier
 
i dont agree ratchet, because them defending posyer means they are going against you, cp, and gram, unless you think for some reason poyser scares them more than the 3 of you combined, which is pretty meme at this point, this logic doesnt track with what a weak scum wud be thinking of

it doesnt take a strong scum to realize that poyser's wagon was a freebie and all they needed is vote on it given you guys are taking credit for it anyway
It's not really going against us though, because they'll have Poyser doing it for them. It's much more comfortable to sit back and have that happen rather than pick against him and risk looking bad for it.
 
i dont agree ratchet, because them defending posyer means they are going against you, cp, and gram, unless you think for some reason poyser scares them more than the 3 of you combined, which is pretty meme at this point, this logic doesnt track with what a weak scum wud be thinking of

it doesnt take a strong scum to realize that poyser's wagon was a freebie and all they needed is vote on it given you guys are taking credit for it anyway
and it's not like they were taking a side, they were actively defending posyer

watson, fang, and ral were standing up for posyer against you cp gram

a better argument wud be that poyser is teammate with one of them, but a poyser town flip likely means everyone standing up for him is likely town

i find it jarring that in a posyer town world you look sooner to scum read the people defending him for flimsy/gut reasons than the masses of stronger players brute force pushing him, and i find it more troubling that you consider the former scenario over one where fang/ral/watson are simply openly defending the scum leader poyser because losing him is a big disaster for the team in general
 
What an almighty smear campaign this is.

My last scum game was frozen in chat and abysmal play into a lynch. I think it’s poor form to suggest I’d be open to such orders from anyone. I pulled my finger out of my arse cos ultra roasted me in pm about activity.

Yeah, I was and am soft on him. My play has evolved to not be an arsehole so that’s what it is. We wanted a claim and he was on 4/7 votes so mine wasn’t needed for my pov. I also didn’t indulge it, I merely asked if it was based on spite given I hadn’t: a) not seen enough to wolf lean him myself or b) not been in last games dead chat where the vibe was to smite him out of revenge for being outplayed. You use this totem pole like it’s a user manual for me - I’ve evolved in taking that shit attitude away and you should be well aware of this. Blatant gaslighting to suit a false agenda is sad to see. Fang said he’d claim animal so I kindly supported the notion of the claim, and he put it all in. If I got aggressive, he gets aggressive back, game gets flooded with crap, he buries his head in the sand and we get nowhere. Why would I call fang out on the spite votes when I observed that myself? I even mentioned that the argument with he and tweet was tiresome? Nice try lad
Sorry lad this is kinda all over the place tbh

1. Why is it poor form to suggest you’d be open to taking instruction from a teammate? Very odd thing to say. You’re always very open to help when you’re scum. Never ever ever ever seen you refuse to do something suggested by a teammate to help your thread play. In fact you’ve had decent success doing the opposite. This defence genuinely doesn’t make any sense.

2. I wasn’t saying you would be an arsehole. In both cases you’d be justified for laying into him and you’d know that. One for acting like anybody wagoning him is out of spite and playing the woe is me card (which you hate) and another for refusing to claim his role when he has a wagon on him (another thing you hate). Both anti town play, both issues close to your heart, performed by a player you usually enjoy going for

3. You did indulge it. It’s there in the quote I commented on. “Seems lazy and opportunistic tbh”. Also don’t really believe for a second that you’d actually believe that people were mad at fang and trying to smite him for outplaying them lol. That’s not a thought you’d really have. Ever.

4. You did comment on the argument with tweet being tiresome, but it wasn’t on Fangs side. In fact you said “fangs act of deliberately being obnoxious is tiresome”.

All of this kind of reads like you are just trying to counter what I said rather than explain yourself. You’re saying stuff which is just blatantly not true, and you seemingly can’t keep track of what your own thoughts and opinions were

Also, one other thing. You acknowledged that there was only 6 hours left and also that you had to go, you said you didn’t vibe town on fang. Yet you put your vote on someone with 0 votes as opposed to fang who had 4 votes or even me who had 3. It’s like you acknowledged we had little time to get a lynch over the line and yet as far as you were concerned, you were throwing away your vote on somebody without a wagon. Why? Did fang’s VT claim make you think he was town?
 
and it's not like they were taking a side, they were actively defending posyer

watson, fang, and ral were standing up for posyer against you cp gram

a better argument wud be that poyser is teammate with one of them, but a poyser town flip likely means everyone standing up for him is likely town

i find it jarring that in a posyer town world you look sooner to scum read the people defending him for flimsy/gut reasons than the masses of stronger players brute force pushing him, and i find it more troubling that you consider the former scenario over one where fang/ral/watson are simply openly defending the scum leader poyser because losing him is a big disaster for the team in general
I'm not seeing what point there is here. I think I've explained my perspective adequately, the rest is up to you.

Your position seems to be that the entire scum team would be throwing themselves at Poyser to lynch him Day 1? I don't really see that as likely. Moreover, I naturally don't have much issue with people who had similar thoughts as I did.
 
This is the sort of thing that makes it hard to read you Town btw Poyser, like you have to be completely ignoring the premise of my argument to make a disingenuous "gotcha", which reads more as you trying to make something happen rather than it be a legitimate train of thought. After being wrong on Gad I'm happy to take a step back, but for me to find you here you're going to have to extend more honesty to your arguments I think.
Come on ratchet. You said you didn’t like the way Watson handled the end of day even regardless of my flip. Clearly you don’t see her as “obviously town” any more so your main reason for scum reading me has been discredited by your own opinion and yet you still think I’m the best lynch. Outside of how I handled Watson, what is your reason for scum reading me?
 
@Emil Who are the people I'm struggling to read that you think I should be?
mainly ral and fang in that poyser town world

I really think solving Poyser would help a lot here but I can see a world where he's town. And actually I have a harder time coming up with team mates for him because as scum he would be wanting his team to look good from his flip, not fall over themselves to protect him.
there is this part too, the game was split into those who scum read posyer vs those who town read him. there werent really anyone null reading him. if you think he is likely scum and his teammates arent the weaker players defending him, then why do you want a claim from ral instead of... cp or gram for instance?
 
One thing I can concede is that scum would want to lynch Poyser before Gad, because Gad will always be there as a viable mislynch. Which I do accept, but really, beyond like Lethal maybe, not many votes fit the bill for that to me. At a stretch Tempest if I really go looking into it. Sky I think too, but they killed her so...
 
Positionally they didn't have much of a reason to oppose the Poyser lynch - it reads to me like their positions were somewhat pulled from thin air. And if I consider that the wagons were town v town, the main consideration I expect low confidence scum to have is how they look good off of it. Naturally, defending Poyser does that - better than defending Gad because if they vote against Poyser, they risk him sniping them. For some players, like you, I would expect you to secure the Poyser lynch because you can just say you defer to someone else to get it, but I would see those three as more likely to get nervous about it.

In order, I would say it applies to Watson the most, then Ral, then Fang. Fang is a bit of an outlier - I don't love how he was so sure Poyser was Town, but I don't really think as scum he's that low confidence, so I could see him being town the most.
But you’re acting like they were just against my wagon for no reason - that’s not the case. Literally all 3 these guys read me town which is reason for being against my lynch. Watson and fang both read me as town really early in the game in fact. Fang was even against my lynch when he was my counterwagon lol. Ral was one that arrived at me being town later when my wagon was near its zenith so I can give you that one but the others don’t really seem like you’ve thought it through
 
Back
Top