Ok, whyNot nailed town, just likelier town than you
Ok, whyNot nailed town, just likelier town than you
Positionally they didn't have much of a reason to oppose the Poyser lynch - it reads to me like their positions were somewhat pulled from thin air. And if I consider that the wagons were town v town, the main consideration I expect low confidence scum to have is how they look good off of it. Naturally, defending Poyser does that - better than defending Gad because if they vote against Poyser, they risk him sniping them. For some players, like you, I would expect you to secure the Poyser lynch because you can just say you defer to someone else to get it, but I would see those three as more likely to get nervous about it.i cant track this part the most - what makes ral and fang automatically bad in a poyser town world exactly?
ok let's leave the hypothetic here for a sec, i understand that post was about what if posyer flips townThis is the sort of thing that makes it hard to read you Town btw Poyser, like you have to be completely ignoring the premise of my argument to make a disingenuous "gotcha", which reads more as you trying to make something happen rather than it be a legitimate train of thought. After being wrong on Gad I'm happy to take a step back, but for me to find you here you're going to have to extend more honesty to your arguments I think.
How would I be knowing it was a mislynch? I’m not wary of you or anybody anymore. Champs taught me that much. You wanna play let’s play.On the surface of that, there does seem to be equity between lethal and fang but im not sure I'd put too much stock into it. I think there's numerous factors at play here, one being him not wanting to just join a the leading wagon onto a mislynch (assuming fang is town) and two, me being active in the thread at the time and lethal being wary of me, and probably not wanting to go against me and create a back and forth
Uh yes? Why would I vote where I didn’t agree on the direction? If I leaned wolf on him I’d not hesitate to vote.bit of a rollercoaster when you put it all together. it seems like he's kind of looking for an opportunity to vote elsewhere
Yesterday I gave an 8 out of 10 for confidence of him being scum. Now I would say 6 - I still stand by parts of what I said yesterday, but it's not as though I'm confident on it any longer. So to answer your question directly, I would lean scum, sort of...ok let's leave the hypothetic here for a sec, i understand that post was about what if posyer flips town
i wanna know what you think, do you think he's town or not?
i dont agree ratchet, because them defending posyer means they are going against you, cp, and gram, unless you think for some reason poyser scares them more than the 3 of you combined, which is pretty meme at this point, this logic doesnt track with what a weak scum wud be thinking ofPositionally they didn't have much of a reason to oppose the Poyser lynch - it reads to me like their positions were somewhat pulled from thin air. And if I consider that the wagons were town v town, the main consideration I expect low confidence scum to have is how they look good off of it. Naturally, defending Poyser does that - better than defending Gad because if they vote against Poyser, they risk him sniping them. For some players, like you, I would expect you to secure the Poyser lynch because you can just say you defer to someone else to get it, but I would see those three as more likely to get nervous about it.
In order, I would say it applies to Watson the most, then Ral, then Fang. Fang is a bit of an outlier - I don't love how he was so sure Poyser was Town, but I don't really think as scum he's that low confidence, so I could see him being town the most.
It's not really going against us though, because they'll have Poyser doing it for them. It's much more comfortable to sit back and have that happen rather than pick against him and risk looking bad for it.i dont agree ratchet, because them defending posyer means they are going against you, cp, and gram, unless you think for some reason poyser scares them more than the 3 of you combined, which is pretty meme at this point, this logic doesnt track with what a weak scum wud be thinking of
it doesnt take a strong scum to realize that poyser's wagon was a freebie and all they needed is vote on it given you guys are taking credit for it anyway
and it's not like they were taking a side, they were actively defending posyeri dont agree ratchet, because them defending posyer means they are going against you, cp, and gram, unless you think for some reason poyser scares them more than the 3 of you combined, which is pretty meme at this point, this logic doesnt track with what a weak scum wud be thinking of
it doesnt take a strong scum to realize that poyser's wagon was a freebie and all they needed is vote on it given you guys are taking credit for it anyway
Sorry lad this is kinda all over the place tbhWhat an almighty smear campaign this is.
My last scum game was frozen in chat and abysmal play into a lynch. I think it’s poor form to suggest I’d be open to such orders from anyone. I pulled my finger out of my arse cos ultra roasted me in pm about activity.
Yeah, I was and am soft on him. My play has evolved to not be an arsehole so that’s what it is. We wanted a claim and he was on 4/7 votes so mine wasn’t needed for my pov. I also didn’t indulge it, I merely asked if it was based on spite given I hadn’t: a) not seen enough to wolf lean him myself or b) not been in last games dead chat where the vibe was to smite him out of revenge for being outplayed. You use this totem pole like it’s a user manual for me - I’ve evolved in taking that shit attitude away and you should be well aware of this. Blatant gaslighting to suit a false agenda is sad to see. Fang said he’d claim animal so I kindly supported the notion of the claim, and he put it all in. If I got aggressive, he gets aggressive back, game gets flooded with crap, he buries his head in the sand and we get nowhere. Why would I call fang out on the spite votes when I observed that myself? I even mentioned that the argument with he and tweet was tiresome? Nice try lad
I'm not seeing what point there is here. I think I've explained my perspective adequately, the rest is up to you.and it's not like they were taking a side, they were actively defending posyer
watson, fang, and ral were standing up for posyer against you cp gram
a better argument wud be that poyser is teammate with one of them, but a poyser town flip likely means everyone standing up for him is likely town
i find it jarring that in a posyer town world you look sooner to scum read the people defending him for flimsy/gut reasons than the masses of stronger players brute force pushing him, and i find it more troubling that you consider the former scenario over one where fang/ral/watson are simply openly defending the scum leader poyser because losing him is a big disaster for the team in general
The things they've been pushing seemed far less reachy and opportunistic than anything you've tried to sell so far imo. I appreciate they've mostly pushed one thing, namely you, so the bar they have to clear is naturally lower, but still.Ok, why
Come on ratchet. You said you didn’t like the way Watson handled the end of day even regardless of my flip. Clearly you don’t see her as “obviously town” any more so your main reason for scum reading me has been discredited by your own opinion and yet you still think I’m the best lynch. Outside of how I handled Watson, what is your reason for scum reading me?This is the sort of thing that makes it hard to read you Town btw Poyser, like you have to be completely ignoring the premise of my argument to make a disingenuous "gotcha", which reads more as you trying to make something happen rather than it be a legitimate train of thought. After being wrong on Gad I'm happy to take a step back, but for me to find you here you're going to have to extend more honesty to your arguments I think.
mainly ral and fang in that poyser town world@Emil Who are the people I'm struggling to read that you think I should be?
there is this part too, the game was split into those who scum read posyer vs those who town read him. there werent really anyone null reading him. if you think he is likely scum and his teammates arent the weaker players defending him, then why do you want a claim from ral instead of... cp or gram for instance?I really think solving Poyser would help a lot here but I can see a world where he's town. And actually I have a harder time coming up with team mates for him because as scum he would be wanting his team to look good from his flip, not fall over themselves to protect him.
But you’re acting like they were just against my wagon for no reason - that’s not the case. Literally all 3 these guys read me town which is reason for being against my lynch. Watson and fang both read me as town really early in the game in fact. Fang was even against my lynch when he was my counterwagon lol. Ral was one that arrived at me being town later when my wagon was near its zenith so I can give you that one but the others don’t really seem like you’ve thought it throughPositionally they didn't have much of a reason to oppose the Poyser lynch - it reads to me like their positions were somewhat pulled from thin air. And if I consider that the wagons were town v town, the main consideration I expect low confidence scum to have is how they look good off of it. Naturally, defending Poyser does that - better than defending Gad because if they vote against Poyser, they risk him sniping them. For some players, like you, I would expect you to secure the Poyser lynch because you can just say you defer to someone else to get it, but I would see those three as more likely to get nervous about it.
In order, I would say it applies to Watson the most, then Ral, then Fang. Fang is a bit of an outlier - I don't love how he was so sure Poyser was Town, but I don't really think as scum he's that low confidence, so I could see him being town the most.