I think my reasons differ greatly from MelkorI am undecided if Melkor defending Pqwerty is an indication of town/scum alignment for Pqwerty, probably more likely to be town. I think Ultra may have been spot on with Melkor good guying a weak, eccentric townie. I still despise Pqwerty's posts and the misinformation they bring but I'll put that to the side for now.
Lappland defending Pqwerty in the same fashion as Melkor and using weak reasoning/evidence (which I have talked about before).
This post has not aged well for Aurelian.
I have a hard time reading what this bolded part at the end is specifically insinuating but it seems important, @EkkoLoJinx
I think Poyser was killed for this post.
Better fix that habit if you wanna win, buddy boyoI very rarely vote before EoD in majority, particularly D1. It is what it is
define unsavory? I have pushed Guillo, X and Ekko. Guillo and X were pushed by others too, Ekko is a push I started, but why is it unsavory. When you read what Ekko says, it kinda becomes clear his logic is faultyGood morning and Merry Christmas, all! Sorry for my long absence, I had a lot of personal Christmas cards to finish drawing. Took up basically my whole day yesterday
After catching up, the main useful information I have gleaned has led me to believe that this Sparkles fella is presumably frozen in scum chat... or also busy. But only I'm allowed to be busy. Other people are banned from busyness.
My chillsometer is telling me that Alexis is town... and my chillsometer is almost never wrong(because I always think Alexis is town and Alexis is usually town)
My dark horse scum candidate is this Lappland fellow. Too many unsavory pushes
I will never admit Watson’s behavior on day 1 is towny. I will never believe that she is town. It does not matter who she has pushed, scum can do it too to distance themselves from their partners. In my opinion, town never lolcats, if they do, they are throwing, i’m gonna assume that an admin in this site is well aware of what throwing is and would not do it, therefore she is not town. She could be a neutral if not Mafia, but i dont care about anything that is not town.
But again, if you wanna keep her so much, i will not waste my vote there.
GoddessBlade on the other hand if look into all votecounts posted yesterday, she could have gone on Melkor, she had the alleged suspicion to be on Melkor, but she chose to be on Watson. She is Mafia.
It is true, go back and look. I dis vote analysis at night.Protection from serial and vig
This is blatantly not true.
I did go back to look to make sure I wasn’t crazy. They were voters #5 & #7 respectively from what I can gatherIt is true, go back and look. I dis vote analysis at night.
It is true, go back and look. I dis vote analysis at night.
If you suspect Watson here, why is your next post a vote against Melkor?
Kinda like what you did with Watson then pivoting to Melkor with your vote.
Do you know if Melkor has been here long enough to know this as much as you do?
Yeah, I don’t see him being scum and antagonizing me like this. It‘s effectively a 1:1 trade off because I will ask for him to be nuked if he pushes through.So he's not scum in your opinion because he wouldn't push a townie? Don't follow.
Also lol at the idea you'd change your play style.
You push me every game lately when I‘m Town. But you’re not scum with Melkor, so you’re just washed.Flower how come you haven't responded to me and tore my ear off at any point this game for saying you could be scum? How come I got more posts than you?
What kind of vote count analysis doesn’t shift through all the vote counts lol
Just disable it in your settings.bVote The snow shit. Fuck off.
Is the snow making you mad too?Are we done with this bulls*** now?
How lol i've looked everywhere haha.Just disable it in your settings.
You push me every game lately when I‘m Town. But you’re not scum with Melkor, so you’re just washed.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?