• We're looking for artists. Direct message Dr. Watson for more info!

Game Official Ranked Xmas Mafia 2024 - Where Worlds Collide

Reader mode
.guillo said:
No that is your interpretation, I am responsible for what I say not for what you interpret
Click to expand...

If it's not an implication, then it's kind of a worthless question isn't it?

You keep playing these semantic angles which don't really serve you at all. If you weren't implying they look good off their votes, or think it at least evidences it, then my assumption is that you asked Ratchet that question as busywork.
 
"How come you think these guys are sus when they voted for Melkor?"

"No of course I'm not saying they're townie for doing that! Completely baseless assumption!"

Doesn't seem like you have any conviction in anything you're saying
 
Ultra said:
If it's not an implication, then it's kind of a worthless question isn't it?
Click to expand...
It is worthless to you, not for me. You may have processes unique to you that are unlike of me.

What i hate about you the most is that you keep saying I have voiced no reason to suspect Watson or Goddess, when I have given them and you have discredited them.
 
Ultra said:
"How come you think these guys are sus when they voted for Melkor?"

"No of course I'm not saying they're townie for doing that! Completely baseless assumption!"

Doesn't seem like you have any conviction in anything you're saying
Click to expand...
 
.guillo said:
I have no reason to believe there is a killing neutral in this game. So I will work under the assumption that the only neutral party here is Watson if they are not scum.

I've played many games and I've found that scum try to discredit the legacy of a town leader by crediting it to a neutral or an uncliamed vig. In this case, i don't see why it is unlikely that Poyser was killed by scum, they are responsible for Melkor and was leading town on day 1, certainly that is a threat most scum parties would want to get rid of in most scenarios.

If you believe otherwise, then you gotta ask, why would scum prefer to kill RDK or Arnej instead of Poyser here? Why them instead of loud voices such as Ultra, Flower, Ekko and Professor? The more you read into those kills, the less sense it makes for Poyser's kill not to come from scum.
Click to expand...
scum likely killed Craig
since it was janitored. and
serial killed poy

and vig tried to kill
watson which ended up kill
R D K. i feel

like this has been said
multiple times to you. i
don't get obtuseness
 
.guillo said:
I have no reason to believe there is a killing neutral in this game. So I will work under the assumption that the only neutral party here is Watson if they are not scum.

I've played many games and I've found that scum try to discredit the legacy of a town leader by crediting it to a neutral or an uncliamed vig. In this case, i don't see why it is unlikely that Poyser was killed by scum, they are responsible for Melkor and was leading town on day 1, certainly that is a threat most scum parties would want to get rid of in most scenarios.

If you believe otherwise, then you gotta ask, why would scum prefer to kill RDK or Arnej instead of Poyser here? Why them instead of loud voices such as Ultra, Flower, Ekko and Professor? The more you read into those kills, the less sense it makes for Poyser's kill not to come from scum.
Click to expand...

1. Bolded was already explained, Janitored kills almost always come from scum
2. Even if you believe that wasn't the case, for someone who thinks Poyser was faction killed, are you following any of his legacy?
 
Ultra said:
If it's not an implication, then it's kind of a worthless question isn't it?

You keep playing these semantic angles which don't really serve you at all. If you weren't implying they look good off their votes, or think it at least evidences it, then my assumption is that you asked Ratchet that question as busywork.
Click to expand...
You can believe whatever the fuck you want. I believe that life is a simulation, most believe that it is a science fiction story.
 
.guillo said:
I have no reason to believe there is a killing neutral in this game. So I will work under the assumption that the only neutral party here is Watson if they are not scum.

I've played many games and I've found that scum try to discredit the legacy of a town leader by crediting it to a neutral or an uncliamed vig. In this case, i don't see why it is unlikely that Poyser was killed by scum, they are responsible for Melkor and was leading town on day 1, certainly that is a threat most scum parties would want to get rid of in most scenarios.

If you believe otherwise, then you gotta ask, why would scum prefer to kill RDK or Arnej instead of Poyser here? Why them instead of loud voices such as Ultra, Flower, Ekko and Professor? The more you read into those kills, the less sense it makes for Poyser's kill not to come from scum.
Click to expand...
There will be a Indie killer in the game. The host has never created a single setup to my knowledge without such a role, Elden Ring even had two. Janitors are also almost exclusively scum abilities, so we can conclude the Janitor comes from scum, RDK died to a Vig saving Watson and Poyser died to SK.
 
.guillo said:
It is worthless to you, not for me. You may have processes unique to you that are unlike of me.

What i hate about you the most is that you keep saying I have voiced no reason to suspect Watson or Goddess, when I have given them and you have discredited them.
Click to expand...

Where did I say this?

I said you gave almost no reason for swapping off Watson TO Goddess. The implication being that you are lacking conviction in your own directions, as you seemed very adamant Watson was scum and should be lynched, and that your excuse to drop your push was also quite lame
 
Ultra said:
1. Bolded was already explained, Janitored kills almost always come from scum
2. Even if you believe that wasn't the case, for someone who thinks Poyser was faction killed, are you following any of his legacy?
Click to expand...
And they could have extra kill power.

I intent to, it's Christmas day and the day is 60 hours. I'm very confident in Goddess being scum so my vote will not move today from her.
 
@Ultra can you see
world where sparkle is non maf?
would it explain some

of guillo's posts here
in trying to get us to
push sparkle not X
 
Ultra said:
Where did I say this?

I said you gave almost no reason for swapping off Watson TO Goddess. The implication being that you are lacking conviction in your own directions, as you seemed very adamant Watson was scum and should be lynched, and that your excuse to drop your push was also quite lame
Click to expand...
So if I keep pushing Watson then I am scum and if I let it go I'm also scum?

That can only mean either of these two things: Agenda or Confbias, which is it?
 
.guillo said:
And they could have extra kill power.

I intent to, it's Christmas day and the day is 60 hours. I'm very confident in Goddess being scum so my vote will not move today from her.
Click to expand...

This is what I'm talking about by the way

Why are you willing to vanity tunnel GB but dropped Watson because nobody wanted to vote her? Doesn't make sense for how I think you play.
 
to be fair to guil
in deck mafia, scums can
often have more than

one source of kills but
those games are bastard unlike
ranked games. could see why

he may speculate
extra kills for scum. still feels
insincere to me

in terms of who he
is choosing to push with his
speculations, yay!
 
Reader mode
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top