• We're looking for artists. Direct message Dr. Watson for more info!

Game Ranked OLF Christmas Mafia 2023 (Day 9)

My secondary role is friend oracle. Unfortunately I can only use them on even nights that fall on a weekend so you’ll have to let them go until then.

Not gonna hold you his claim does sound like nonsense, but I think the last few games have taught me not to get hung up on the small stuff, think based on his recent responses in comparison to situations where he's been scum he's more likely town
 
89vn5u.jpg
 
Not gonna hold you his claim does sound like nonsense, but I think the last few games have taught me not to get hung up on the small stuff, think based on his recent responses in comparison to situations where he's been scum he's more likely town
It's the role I was given
 
I'm saying your interactions with me and operating like Ultra's consort come off flakey and weird and I can't remember a recent game of you as town doing this. I don't like it.
Yes that has been made clear

let me level with you here

You have a habit of selectively choosing specific points to work off of and, as seen here, refusing to acknowledge the actual point being made

My concern is you selectively respond to highly specific details, creating a disconnect between one picture presented to you and the other. The decisions behind your vote appear unclear after claiming a neutral stance (your opinion over the outcome of the slot - you say you're not too fussed with it while simultaneously voting and then refusing to remove the vote under that premise). It comes across as moving goalposts whether you intend to or not.

Me quoting the post Ult gave about Lu has nothing to do with Ultra. You asked for reasonings and I was clearly trying to show you those reasonings have already been given.
I don't understand why these dots can't be connected. A case has already been prepared, explained, and cited by the person you wanted input from. You then avoid answering an even simpler question which is: do you think the case and Ult's reasoning is going to drastically change?
Is it because you are looking for something specific here?

Regarding the scum lean on me, it feels like self-defense and does come across as more genuine than this wild gaslighting goose chase
 
Poyser: leaning town
You: leaning town
Rugrat: leaning town for sticking his neck out for me when I'm easily in hammer position with a handful of more votes
Ultra: soft town reading/most confident on due to his position and play
Ratchet: null
Sky: scum
Retro: null/scum foe being way too invested being Ultra's patsy
Evans: null/town from interactions with Sky
DrProf: claimed indie
Lethal: don't trust
Luka: null
Craig: null/town
Ekko: null
Orca+Polar: cba
Gad: null
Nibles: feels town from lack of interest

Alco: scum probably (he's b*lgian) after all
No idea about Tweet with that PR but if the example with Ratchet taught me anything is suspect him anyways
 
Yes that has been made clear

let me level with you here

You have a habit of selectively choosing specific points to work off of and, as seen here, refusing to acknowledge the actual point being made

My concern is you selectively respond to highly specific details, creating a disconnect between one picture presented to you and the other. The decisions behind your vote appear unclear after claiming a neutral stance (your opinion over the outcome of the slot - you say you're not too fussed with it while simultaneously voting and then refusing to remove the vote under that premise). It comes across as moving goalposts whether you intend to or not.

Me quoting the post Ult gave about Lu has nothing to do with Ultra. You asked for reasonings and I was clearly trying to show you those reasonings have already been given.
I don't understand why these dots can't be connected. A case has already been prepared, explained, and cited by the person you wanted input from. You then avoid answering an even simpler question which is: do you think the case and Ult's reasoning is going to drastically change?
Is it because you are looking for something specific here?

Regarding the scum lean on me, it feels like self-defense and does come across as more genuine than this wild gaslighting goose chase
I picked points that are salient and relevant tbh to address
 
Unvote

I can be assed but I'm going to try not to and refrain from omgus territory, I'll let whoever the fuck wants to do this
Am done
 
Gad and ratchet ignoring me 🤔
I would nevurrrrr. Where did I ignore you, panda buddy?
Hey all.

Scrooge. Miller.

Let’s have some festive cheer
Unnecessary but cool. Miller is one where you return a guilty verdict if investigated, right? This is so blatantly stupid to pull off as scum I actually want to believe this.
I liked Poyser but then he began arguing with Sir Ratchet and I was not a fan of that.

And regardless of who is wrong and who is right Sir Ratchet is a treasured colleague of mine.
Just to be clear, you're not basing this off reads but just who's nice to you, right?
To be Profs friend requires you to join the lizzard cult, do you have what it takes?
You playing differently from the last game where you were more actively hunting.
Prof stock's plummeting...
This is bad imo. He already admitted indie and hinted at arson while directly denying it (Don't ask me, I'm just reading his posts, he's the one making the moves). Idk why you're wasting time on reading him tbh.
Is that coded talk for being cultists or something
You're looking a little too deep into obvious joke posts.

You should be looking into the glory of Hanukkah instead.
 
Back
Top