• We're looking for artists. Direct message Dr. Watson for more info!

Game Ranked OLF Christmas Mafia 2023 (Day 9)

Reader mode
Caldust said:
Is Dr Watson shit at mafia normally or just today?
Click to expand...

Politely, I think she has 0 regard for thinking strategically about intervening in a line of questioning and whatnot, and as town she's more of a spaz. Think her behavior around Alco would be more linear if she was scum. E.g. she would just probably pile on him and move on
 
Ral said:
3. @Sky... something hasn't seemed right since I first started reading the room and then everyone magically jumps ship, you end up on the radar again by @Aurelian, and now you're not on the radar again for the second time?? If I were scrum, and I'm not btw, that would be a play I would think of using, basically get your fellow scum to target you, pretend like you are gaining their trust, and then slide a different scum member into the mix in order to not arouse any suspicion of getting unvoted all at once.
Click to expand...
See, this wouldn't work because no member of this community could convincingly come to trust me
 
  • Dead
Reactions: Ral
Sky said:
Yeah overfocusing on defending Lethal does not look great when there's so much more going on

Unvote
Vote Alco

to engage him
Click to expand...
Ok this is the first post from you that has actually given me red flags. Seems pretty image conscious, why feel the need to specify that you were voting to engage him?
 
Evans said:
Why am I definite scum after you said i could be either way earlier?
Click to expand...
Everyone has mostly ignored me up until now, except you, why is that? What made you want to acknowledge me when no one else bothered to begin with? Because I let out a little excitement for the game? What drew you to my excitement? The fact that you feel as if what I said doesn't contribute to the game? I think it does, and I just get bad vibes from you overall.

@Ratchet, @Dr_Professor83, what made y'all vote to lynch @Evans to begin with? I can't obviously keep up with how fast this shit is going, so I'd like a recap if possible. Thank you in advance.

In hindsight, @Evans, what made you vote for @Aurelian? That wagon's been draggin' on the same broken ass wheel all day long, and I'd like the same explanation from @Lethal, @Poyser, @Alco , @Hans Tweetenberg, and @Sky, why @Aurelian?
 
Grammaton said:
Well that’s not really how this game works, is it?
Click to expand...
Okay big bold black letters for you

This is me telling you politely I'm close to putting a bullet in my very frustrated low or non-functioning brain stem because I'm failing to properly explain what I want to explain in concrete details
 
Poyser said:
Ok this is the first post from you that has actually given me red flags. Seems pretty image conscious, why feel the need to specify that you were voting to engage him?
Click to expand...
Simply because I'd seen very little from him

I would like a claim at this point because his response has been a load of poo
 
Ral said:
Everyone has mostly ignored me up until now, except you, why is that? What made you want to acknowledge me when no one else bothered to begin with? Because I let out a little excitement for the game? What drew you to my excitement? The fact that you feel as if what I said doesn't contribute to the game? I think it does, and I just get bad vibes from you overall.

@Ratchet, @Dr_Professor83, what made y'all vote to lynch @Evans to begin with? I can't obviously keep up with how fast this shit is going, so I'd like a recap if possible. Thank you in advance.

In hindsight, @Evans, what made you vote for @Aurelian? That wagon's been draggin' on the same broken ass wheel all day long, and I'd like the same explanation from @Lethal, @Poyser, @Alco , @Hans Tweetenberg, and @Sky, why @Aurelian?
Click to expand...
This is the shit I wanted to see

Keep going
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ral
Sky said:
Simply because I'd seen very little from him

I would like a claim at this point because his response has been a load of poo
Click to expand...
Well that doesn’t seem very accurate, because the first line implies you agree with the case on him
 
Dr. Watson said:
Okay big bold black letters for you

This is me telling you politely I'm close to putting a bullet in my very frustrated low or non-functioning brain stem because I'm failing to properly explain what I want to explain in concrete details
Click to expand...

Wanna give up trying to make it on your own in this cruel and hostile environment and +1 me unconditionally
 
Dr. Watson said:
It's 8pm in Belgium right now. Subtract 6-7ish hours for sleep if he's lucky enough. Doesn't give him a lot of time to actually be pressured and react historically speaking

(I'm aware of how this looks, come at me bro)

Someone ping him on discord before he fucks off to bed

Good news is we do have the advantage of getting a consensus going on before the 10 hour mark
Click to expand...
This isn’t allowed btw
 
Poyser said:
Well that doesn’t seem very accurate, because the first line implies you agree with the case on him
Click to expand...
What are you trying to angle at here? He'd not been good, but I felt that if he were town he'd come with something better when engaged. He didn't.
 
Sky said:
What are you trying to angle at here? He'd not been good, but I felt that if he were town he'd come with something better when engaged. He didn't.
Click to expand...
see I always find these types of replies funny because what are you expecting realistically? (this isn't an ironic question)
 
Sky said:
What are you trying to angle at here? He'd not been good, but I felt that if he were town he'd come with something better when engaged. He didn't.
Click to expand...
Did I not explain the angle in my original post? My angle is you seemed very image conscious. You wanted the wagon to gain momentum but you seemed worried about being seen on it
 
Reader mode
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top