One cannot ask such a question and live in reality. All of our academia is infested subversive and hostile to the US. Jesus even conservative institutions like Hillsdale college teach appeasement.
And I guess Jesus Christ is coming to save me now as well because I said so?
If you want a point to be taken seriously then it needs to be backed up by facts. If we can't agree on what is and isn't a fact then there's no arguments to be had, just people sharing their personal experiences which are valueless in finding the truth of any given matter.
The absolutely deplorable state of the world over the last decade and the sprint to tyranny is evidence enough.
No it isn't and I know you know this is no different than leftist saying that all whites are evil racists. I have no interest in harboring such nonsense here and as a fair and balanced individual I must apply that standard to BOTH sides.
My proof is the deification and fetishization of a man whose family was connected to the Genovese crime family and whose incompetent response to a pandemic resulted in millions dead from HIV. Solely because he provides a placebo that enables a social neurosis.
Where did you even read this? Not even a source. This is just rambling at this point. You realize that yes?
Further more demanding sources in the manner that you and other users do is an attempt to stonewall, by babbling about accredited sources one sets the theme of dismissal and does so to impeach anything that doesn't fit their worldview
Listen very closely. The news section is for serious discussion about issues that affect the lives of real people. Left or right we cannot abide having ridiculous opinions with zero backing. No matter the member or subject in question I'm not interested how you reconcile something within yourself, I'm interested how facts and realoty reconcile with your opinion as all should.
@Es_ has a great stance on "Source bros" and that's to dismiss them and mock them and continue to assert his claims.
If this section was a majority peolle who believe black people are incapable of being racist and you tried to argue them down you would fail under your style of management.
This is not a realistic way for the facts to come out, it's a recipe for an asylum of conspiracy theories clashing in opppsition. No we need some semblance of order.
It's a stance I wholly approve of.
Good faith debate is impossible when pedantry and obtusity are involved.
It's obtuse to think an unbacked opinion is of worth in a serious discussion.
I do not believe former Cafe users, especially those who support domestic terrorist organizations are qualified to determine the format for discussion.
Half the people you called into this thread spent the better part of two years making false accusations that bordered on defamation against the OBD and against users in particular.
I made many claims to show that I don't let my bias affect me. If you can make bold and unbacked claims that our entire system is corrupt then you're okay with someone claiming all white people are racist.
If you're unwilling to show that you're better than these people and not at their level then we have simply made an equally shitty and opposite version of the cafe.
Also half the people? So you're saying I invited half yay and half nay? That sounds fair to me.
Your mislike of sources that contradict the official narrative is concerning. You cannot moderate an information section and condemn the dissemination of information.
I didn't any sources I debated lacked peer review or had a small sample size, very commonly known weaknesses to sources.
I didn't thread ban anyone, delete any posts, or close any threads.
And it looks like this thread is merely an attempt at justification for the suppression of information in posterity.
Tldr: there should be no central standards and I encourage users to flood the section with info wars articles as a form of protesting censorship
The userbase can determine whats horse shit or not, by using their own brains and common sense.
Again you say the userbase can determine it but the same wouldn't apply to the NF cafe in your eyes would it? Imagine this moderation but with the even variation of opinions on NF.
