Probably not tbh, if you guys who have actually read everything have a better understanding of which part he's CCing, there's no need to spell it out just so the guy without a vote understands.
I vaguely know what to expect from him and fervent scumhunting isn't it. Also like I said, your case looks to start with its conclusion and then looks solely for facts that promote it and blurring everything else out. It just doesn't do anything for me.
Sooo If mafia have an extra kill floating about like TAT claims to have, why would he claim to have used it on a night nobody died? In fact, why claim it at all?
???? I just fucking did? I told you what I think of that case? It's also on record who I'd like to see lynched instead but it's not like that's ever gonna be valid gameplay to you.
Though I'd like to think that him apparently coming in start of d3 and claiming his usage instantly is more of a move by someone who doesn't have a team, and also not a move by someone who puts value into the fact that the thread thought they were the vig.
I still think BPD is town but that entire case strikes me as someone who started with a conclusion and worked his way towards reaching it. In the process we got more of that same symptom that Poyser and Ultra are afflicted with, the notion that someone they find scummy just can't ever have a single point in their favor, their posts are just pure shit all the way. Y'all really gotta stop doing that as town.
If TAT claims to haveseen Poyser visit CP, does that make sense? Assuming that Poyser drives CP and some other guy, shouldn't that mean he'd see Poyser actually visit the other guy?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register. By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.