Game Ranked EastEnders Mafia

[Hans Tweetenberg]

Though I'd like to think that him apparently coming in start of d3 and claiming his usage instantly is more of a move by someone who doesn't have a team, and also not a move by someone who puts value into the fact that the thread thought they were the vig.

 

[Ultra]

No, I'm not certain of that. Just feel like if we are going to start we need to finish. Also, like I said, we need a discussion on Xenos shots.

Ok. You start. Woof

 

[Hans Tweetenberg]

Stop playing backseat townie then and do something? Woof.

???? I just fucking did? I told you what I think of that case?

It's also on record who I'd like to see lynched instead but it's not like that's ever gonna be valid gameplay to you.

 

[Ultra]

I don't see TAT being scum. Why claim the watch? Everyone just accepted he was the vig. Anyway, unless someone CC's the vig or watch, seems pretty low % that TAT is scum

Well he would have to explain a rather horrid shot then wouldn't he?

I had a thought - if this is his fake claim it's possible mafia has an extra shot lying around and they used it. Nobody has claimed a 3rd kill tonight and they probably won't be. Woof.

 

[Hans Tweetenberg]

No, I'm not certain of that. Just feel like if we are going to start we need to finish. Also, like I said, we need a discussion on Xenos shots.

What? Why? Why do we gotta waste time on the SKs shots? What does that accomplish?

 

[Tempest]

Well he would have to explain a rather horrid shot then wouldn't he?

I had a thought - if this is his fake claim it's possible mafia has an extra shot lying around and they used it. Nobody has claimed a 3rd kill tonight and they probably won't be. Woof.

What horrid shot? Do you think mafia have a vig with his own separate kills?

 

[Tempest]

@xenos5 shoot whoever has the fewest posts unless it's Retro

there, SK discussion over.

 

[Hans Tweetenberg]

Well he would have to explain a rather horrid shot then wouldn't he?

I had a thought - if this is his fake claim it's possible mafia has an extra shot lying around and they used it. Nobody has claimed a 3rd kill tonight and they probably won't be. Woof.

Sooo

If mafia have an extra kill floating about like TAT claims to have, why would he claim to have used it on a night nobody died? In fact, why claim it at all?

 

[Ultra]

What horrid shot? Do you think mafia have a vig with his own separate kills?

I mean what's your explanation? Xenos shot Pein and neither Poyser/Fang have been claimed and they were both townie targets. Woof

 

[Tempest]

I mean what's your explanation? Xenos shot Pein and neither Poyser/Fang have been claimed and they were both townie targets. Woof

We have literally never had a mafia vig in my 12 years on WF/WS lol. just no

 

[Dr. Watson]

shoot TAT IMHO

if there's reservations to lynch him later on or the wagon changed

 

[Dr. Watson]

big if

 

[Ultra]

Sooo

If mafia have an extra kill floating about like TAT claims to have, why would he claim to have used it on a night nobody died? In fact, why claim it at all?

Fair point I guess.

We have literally never had a mafia vig in my 12 years on WF/WS lol. just no

...Alright then what's your fucking explanation? We have an unclaimed town vig in our ever receding pool of unclaimed players who shot very not obvious targets? Woof

 

[Ultra]

Only person left I could see making those shots is X...oh no.

 

[Tempest]

Fair point I guess.



...Alright then what's your fucking explanation? We have an unclaimed town vig in our ever receding pool of unclaimed players who shot very not obvious targets? Woof

mafia having an extra 1-shot kill, i.e a 1x strongman or ninja whose kill is separate from the factional kill. could be flay, but I don't see it with how open he's been about his role usages. would also mean that we don't have a vig or watcher (in a game with 2 SKs, at least one bulletproof)

also could've been a scum role thief or something who used their role on xenos to get a kill, idk. I just don't think it's likely to be flay.

 

[Ultra]

mafia having an extra 1-shot kill, i.e a 1x strongman or ninja whose kill is separate from the factional kill. could be flay, but I don't see it with how open he's been about his role usages. would also mean that we don't have a vig or watcher (in a game with 2 SKs, at least one bulletproof)

also could've been a scum role thief or something who used their role on xenos to get a kill, idk. I just don't think it's likely to be flay.

Wait, this is what I was saying. Woof.

 

[Tempest]

Wait, this is what I was saying. Woof.

thought you were implying they had multiple kills

anyway, still don't think it's flay

 

[The X]

???

Woof?

Don't even know why the fuck I wrote that. Might have been thinking of Ratchet.

 

[Tempest]

@Grammaton Where you at on Lethal?

 

[The X]

Was BPD even remotely sus of TAT before just now?

Yes. I thought the vig claim was kind of weird from the get go. Would it even matter, though, if I hadn't? I already mentioned that I was changing things up after seeing Poyser and Fang flip town.