Search results for query: *

Sure, I just wanted something added so it differentiates between the two You can also compress it into something like TTGL's definitions, and update low multiversal to include universes with multiple dimensions at least equal to the observable universe as an example so it would go low universal > high universal > universal+ on a finite scale > universal + on an infinite scale > low multiversal finite scale > low multiversal infinite scale (small number of infinite universes or something similar etc.) > multiversal/multiversal+ > massively multiversal or w/e where we currently have megaversal characters of mulltiverses of finite size > multiple multiverses of infinite size is the new megaversal or a new term

Making this post do I don't forget my train of thought I think something like Top's idea makes the most sense I just really don't like having to put Infinite in the actual tier name Anyone who can destroy the cosmos equal to the observable universe or similarly cannot destroy space-time and just matter - downgraded to Low Universe Level Anyone who can destroy all matter beyond the below and including the space time of a finite universe - high universal or w/e new term for this tier Anyone who can destroy a finite universe with limited dimensions which share the same space-time - becomes a new finite universal+ tier anyone who can destroy an infinite universe - upgraded to infinite universal or w/e new term for this tier Anyone who can destroy a infinite universe with limited dimensions which share the same space-time - becomes a new infinite universal+ tier Anyone who can destroy universes with multiple distinct timelines or multiple universes with own space-time - upgraded to...

My major concern is differentiating infinite and non infinite universes/multiverses and agreeing on the terms to be used for both, because that is not clearly established currently anything above that, sorry but that's someone else's problem

I agree with goldenboy that there should be some separation between infinite universe/multiverse cosmologies and finite ones somehow, because as far as I am aware there is no actual listed difference for either using current terms just that agreed upon definition and/or naming needs work

megaversal > gigaversal > zettaversal