• We're looking for artists. Direct message Dr. Watson for more info!

Circus of Humorous & Humiliating Arguments Part 5: Diamonds are fleeting. Stupid lasts forever

I mean, you can see the damage done lol. The walls don't even fully shatter. It doesn't really matter to me  why Saiyans get consistently bad physicals, they just do. Ch. 77 of DBS is no exception.
Fictions weird like that. You can name thousands of examples where a character who can tank a planet exploding yet get hurt from being slammed into a building without the building collapsing
 
this is just a thing that happens in fiction for the same reason that the square cube law is ignored
otherwise every kaiju ever would die instantly, and giant robots would be impossible because they'd shear apart under the stress like giant wind turbines destroying themselves
 
You can name thousands of examples where a character who can tank a planet exploding yet get hurt from being slammed into a building
Sure, I guess. I don't think "fiction" has rules like this, though, and I think this inflexibility is why you and Chaos and grill perceive "well OPM also isn't 100% consistent" as being an argument at all as opposed to just like, gesturing and handwringing. Listing a lot of scans isn't an argument and frankly has very little to do with why I believe what I believe. If we were just going to sit around and list every scan where an Uchiha does something more impressive than Taro we'd be listing every scan in Naruto involving the Uchiha, because Taro literally doesn't do anything on-screen.
 
Trying to say something is weak because we dont see a lot of damage is hot garbage dog, no matter how you try to twist it.
 
Or very simple. You can provide a scan that beats the moon busting fodder Taro took out. Especially since my argument is that Taro can counter Genjutsu from the huge power difference the moment he flairs up his Ki
 
You can provide a scan that beats the moon busting fodder Taro took out.
I don't agree with the premise, lol. I agree Taro could bust the Moon. I also don't think the Uchiha can bust the Moon. I still think the Uchiha are stronger than Taro. I'm not like, "arguing" here. If you want to know why I think this I've written probably literally tens of thousands of words on the topic already and I don't care to write thousands more in an extremely hostile environment wherein I'm sure about 1% of its users could understand what I'm talking about anyways (and if they did, they'd complain it's too long). If you can explain to me what you think I believe and why I believe it I would be willing to engage here, because this would at least demonstrate I don't have to overcome the initial gap of "I think tiers are fake and not all fiction should be held to the same standard".
 

Except fiction DOES have rules like these, that's the entire point of why I consistently stated as such before I got perma-banned that people in Spacebattles act like it doesn't(until it's convenient to suddenly ignore it).
We literally have the animators and those in charge of those animators dead ass stating that the Broly vs. Gogeta fight was going to be far more fantastical with them destroying Planets and Stars and outwardly disrupting Reality... but they chose not to because it would be too much. It's the same reason why you have fights in Bleach where characters can casually cut down Skyscrapers... can suddenly not even do that much unless it's there just to show the scope of something.

That's how it always is in fiction even in One Punch Man, even in American Comics and especially in videogames.
 

My dude, no one is gonna feel bad for your song and dance when:

1. The thing with the "Uchiha can't Moon Bust" is already null and void when Sasuke has shown feats that would still have him be Naruto's relative peer who literally took Toneri's best attack which cut the Moon in half and completely blocked it.

2. Spacebattles is genuinely the far more hostile environment with mods that can and will ban you for any and every reason and people can and will heckle you with zero evidence only based on "reputation"(Something I have seen, witnessed and have been a part of with all the time I have been there).

3. You are unironically trying to hold fiction to the same standard by acting as if they have to prove something in the exact same fashion. Uchiha being able to Moon Bust is not something that makes no sense, it's simple, proper scaling. We don't need to see someone destroy a Moon if they have done something with enough Destructive Capability and Attack Potency to do so(Something SB consistently tries, fails and then go full reddit logic on).
Something even VSB understands even if they go the whole clownshow about it so I don't want to hear that.
 
I mean, I’ve been been pretty civil with you. Also, I don’t see how they’re stronger than Taro. Ki is everything from not just energy blasts to physical strength.

And we’ve seem strength being relative to Ki not just every time someone with greater Ki physically overpowers an opponent, but in the amount of destruction their physical blows deal to the environment

By Super. You got characters creating universe crumbling shockwaves with their punches or shattering entire dimensions like with Gogeta vs Broly when they break out of that weird dimension they were briefly in
 
I don't think "fiction" has rules like this, though, and I think this inflexibility is why you and Chaos and grill perceive "well OPM also isn't 100% consistent" as being an argument at all as opposed to just like, gesturing and handwringing.
i at least cant speak on OPM, i am saying virtually no fictional series is 100% consistent to real life, that physics is changed or ignored to suit the story being told, and this happens everywhere, and most importantly harping on collateral damage doesn't invalidate characters other feats (and yes, one shot instakilling a dude who can blow up the moon under his own power is a feat), it just ends up looking hilariously desperate
 
Fiction doesn’t have rules

No shit

That’s not the issue, because to play this game we need to establish rules. Hypocrisy in this setting is cardinal sin, the rigidity makes the conclusions actually hold weight, even if only by subjective measure

Play how you like, but your perspective holds no value when it’s more fluid than water when it comes to application
 
i will clarify at least personally im more of a narrative scaling guy if you want to demonstrate characters arent as strong as claimed i think they should be founded in those estimates going against the story as we are shown, but people doing the pointing wojak meme every time planet busters dont kill all of humanity every time they fight is not remotely that
 
destroying Planets and Stars and outwardly disrupting Reality... but they chose not to because it would be too much
  1. Link?
  2. Don't you think the animators considering this and then going "nevermind, that's too crazy" just indicates that like, they actually don't think Gogeta can fly around and bust planets and stuff lol. What would be crazy about it if not the scale?
i am saying virtually no fictional series is 100% consistent to real life
Sure, this also has nothing to do with my argument. I believe that Saitama can destroy Jupiter in spite of the finishing blow on Garou, and I believe Taro would die if he was kicked through several buildings in spite of what he does to the Moon. I also believe Superman can move planets in spite of what he sometimes does to planes, and I think Hulk could sometimes be killed by nukes in spite of what he does to planets. I think all of these stories tell different things and work on different rules, so pointing out "well by your logic X thing is actually Y" just kinda bounces off of me.
That’s not the issue, because to play this game we need to establish rules.
No, we don't. No more than like, literary journals have to establish rules for literary analysis. I think different things are true for different stories because different people make them and have different things to say and different beliefs about the world. I think attempting to put rules on this is impossible and leads to the aforementioned inflexible stagnation and, worst, just obviously wrong conclusions.
 
There’s a bunch of “I think” going on and that’s awfully silly for a guy fixated on the differences between authors. You enjoy speculating on their intent, which is neat, but when you lack the objective clarity of it? All it becomes is a reflection of your own personal bias.

You can play this game like that, but you’re doomed to fail because you sure as fuck aren’t the author and inference of a real person you’ve never met is a laughable extrapolation to make. Arrogant even.
 

It's funny to me because he's trying to have his cake and eat it too:
I don't think "fiction" has rules like this, though, and I think this inflexibility is why you and Chaos and grill perceive "well OPM also isn't 100% consistent" as being an argument at all as opposed to just like, gesturing and handwringing.
This is 100% Doublespeak and basically ignoring dead ass what you are talking about so he can still try and make his point about Dragonball while keeping One Punch Man where he believes it is...
It's the exact same shit you see in SB threads and it's users all the time and it's pure bad faith arguments.

Funny enough, that's how we(the entire VS. Debates/Powerscaling Community) have to be and that's what Spacebattles fails to be. You have to understand that narrative matters just as much, if not moreso on why a feat matters and you shouldn't slap it out unless it's an unequivocal outlier. You can't ignore what Kirkbride has put into The Elder Scrolls because "lolMedieval Weaponry" and "Game Engine issues" anymore than you can try and point out that "One Punch Man" is more consistent and then ignore the times Saitama isn't killing people with his shockwaves or can take hours to get across a city but can move FTL.
That's the entire problem right then and there and the failure to follow through on that is why the Powerscaling Community is seen as a joke by most due to the newbies not understanding that simple concept.
 
You can practically find it anywhere based on the movie Dragonball Super: Broly as it's in it's novelization and the animator interview.

Don't you think the animators considering this and then going "nevermind, that's too crazy" just indicates that like, they actually don't think Gogeta can fly around and bust planets and stuff lol. What would be crazy about it if not the scale?
You mean in the same fashion they did with SSJG Goku and Beerus? Or because of the fact it would ultimately just be a ridiculous spectacle that wouldn't look right no matter how well they did it considering how it came off in the movie?

Again, it's not making any point at all for yourself, all it's doing is exposing your bias and the potential issue with your rhetoric in the first place.
 
inference of a real person you’ve never met is a laughable extrapolation to make. Arrogant even.
I mean, the easy reply here is that this is projection borne out of your own lack of empathy, but also uhhhh, I don't believe you lol.

Unless you literally think you're incapable of determining the themes or message of a story unless it's spoonfed to you, you are perfectly capable of inferring intent. And, even if you can't... I think I can! You can think that's arrogant if you want, but I think I'm just doing due diligence and often speaking to authors directly just reconfirms what I'd already expected. If you still think it's impossible, fine I guess. I think you're basically admitting to being too stupid to read, though, in which case like what's the point in trying.
You can practically find it anywhere based on the movie Dragonball Super: Broly as it's in it's novelization and the animator interview.
Uh, well, I can't. So, I'd like the link, since it's apparently so easy?