Apparently the paper that is being used to justify the attack on gas stoves recently came from an institute deeply tied in the pockets of the CCP.
Any evidence for this claim?
it's too expensive compared to gas stoves
Like electric cars
Meet the Green Energy Group Behind the Study That's Driving Calls To Ban Gas Stoves
The green energy group behind a study cited in Consumer Product Safety commissioner Richard Trumka Jr.'s call to ban gas stoves has partnered with the Chinese government to implement an "economy-wide transformation" away from oil and gas.freebeacon.com
Basically working with any China entity is working with the CCP
Washington Free Beacon Media Bias Rating
Learn the AllSides Media Bias Rating of Washington Free Beacon. AllSides rates the media bias of hundreds of news outlets, media sources and writers.www.allsides.com
It doesn't get more biased than that site my dude. Is that really the place you're going to go for unbiased, neutral, facts? I wouldn't.
Might as well watch CNN and use it as your bible. Same shit different side.
They tell you FACTS about who did what that you can independently check.
ZOMGH bias!
what the....
Washington beacon : Water is Wet, *Links directly to sources to confirm the information.
All sides user : Nope, Cannot believe it. bias website.
same energy
Our track record of professional services includes a number of precedent-setting transactions, demonstrating our deep participation in China’s economic reforms and development. Our goal is to become a leading international investment bank in China, as well as a significant player in the global financial market.
CCTP's founding partners include The Energy Foundation China, China Academy of Transportation Sciences, Transport Planning and Research Institute of the Ministry of Transport, Vehicle Emission Control Center of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Energy Research Institute of the National Development and Reform Committee, Tsinghua University, Beijing Institute of Technology, Society of Automotive Engineers of China, China Automotive Technology and Research Center, Beijing Transport Institute, Shanghai Electric Vehicle Public Data Collection, Monitoring and Research Center, Clean Air Asia, and the Innovation Center for Energy and Transportation.
In January, RMI, the Energy Transitions Commission, the We Mean Business coalition, and the World Economic Forum launched the Mission Possible Partnership to accelerate the decarbonization of heavy industry and transport. The MPP will unify the critical actors needed to influence and enable industry transformation at speed and scale.
Reuters is a propaganda site, just like National Review. National Review is especially insidious as it's a conservative site still promoting the boomer delusions of Modernism, Protestantism, Neoliberalism, Americanism, and Democracy to placate conservatives like some sort of opiate.
Wei Ding is on here, he runs this company:
China Program - RMI
RMI is providing the technical and economic pathways for China to peak carbon emissions by 2030 and reach a zero-carbon economy by 2050.rmi.org
The Rocky Mountain Institute also sits on the China Clean Transportation Partnership:
http://en.cctp.org.cn/product/36498.html
These partners are as "independent" as fasci in Fascist Italy, aka only to the extent that they can make a profit. The second they aren't or they fall out of the CCP's favor, they are nationalized and distributed to more loyal corporations.
In fact the National Development and Reform Committee is an outright state organ:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?