• We're looking for artists. Direct message Dr. Watson for more info!

Game Ranked I Think You Should Leave - A Mafia Game by Sky

Status
Not open for further replies.
Reader mode
Ultra said:
I'm deconstructing your reasoning here because it doesn't make sense to me.

You said on Night 2 you claimed so you wouldn't get vigged

That consideration is now being retroactively applied to why you were flirting with claiming on Day 1, before we even knew there was a vig confirmed

And again - I can't stress this enough - claiming Doc puts you directly in more danger than having a vig shooting you. You know this. Having to drag you through the mud explaining this feels like something I should not be required to do
Click to expand...
Ultra he probably assumed there was a Vig because he Carrie's the preconceived notion that games will have town killing power, when you consider the breadth of his experience it makes perfect sense for him to assume there is on.

With that in mind his reasoning follows through. I'll go further and say he probably didn't care a whit about Mafia killing him - he just wanted pressure to go and for town to not mis shoot him.
 
Ratchet said:
Nope, speak plainly.
Click to expand...

Alright

From the amount of actions submitted N2 (8), we're staring down two scenarios here:

A) We have 3 scum, one in the action claimed pile, and 2 in the no action pile

B) We have 2 scum, both in the no action claimed pile

You can check my reciepts for this earlier, or rationalize it out yourself, or correct me

But if you don't believe in scenario A) Nibel should be more or less confirmed scum for you
 
RDK said:
Tell me why he's outside his scum range.

He's got me as hard town, does that make sense to you?
Click to expand...
hes not outside his scum range, idk what would really be considered outside his scum range in general
i simply think he makes sense with what i believe and am confident abt which makes me likely to trust him and find him townie

as for him having u as hard town, he said it was due to u being emotional so i have no reason to trust his judgment over my own on that one
 
Ultra said:
I'm deconstructing your reasoning here because it doesn't make sense to me.

You said on Night 2 you claimed so you wouldn't get vigged

That consideration is now being retroactively applied to why you were flirting with claiming on Day 1, before we even knew there was a vig confirmed

And again - I can't stress this enough - claiming Doc puts you directly in more danger than having a vig shooting you. You know this. Having to drag you through the mud explaining this feels like something I should not be required to do
Click to expand...

i'd rather be killed by mafia than by town.

I wasn't "afraid of vig" D1. D1 i was over being pushed for bs reasons.
 
Could see a potential scenario of both Tweet and Polar being town and Chuck/Hime/Ratchet scum.
 
Ultra said:
But if you don't believe in scenario A) Nibel should be more or less confirmed scum for you
Click to expand...
Yes, I've been saying I am very confident he's scum Ultra! I'm not seeing what issue you're supposed to have here. I'll remind you I started today voting him.

Both Gad and Tweet claimed no action, yes? So either can be scum. My PoE of Nibel/Gad/Tweet stands - QED.
 
Polar Bear said:
You weren't being lynched d1 so claiming doc d1 makes absolutely no sense
Click to expand...

I had Ultra, RDK and CP pushing for my wagon. Like, go and look up any "vanilla" game i've played. Or any game tbh. Look what happens when I'm being voted up. Only reason why i didn't straight up claimed instantly is because well, it's vanilla game.
 
hime said:
hes not outside his scum range, idk what would really be considered outside his scum range in general
i simply think he makes sense with what i believe and am confident abt which makes me likely to trust him and find him townie

as for him having u as hard town, he said it was due to u being emotional so i have no reason to trust his judgment over my own on that one
Click to expand...
lol
 
Ratchet said:
Yes, I've been saying I am very confident he's scum Ultra! I'm not seeing what issue you're supposed to have here. I'll remind you I started today voting him.

Both Gad and Tweet claimed no action, yes? So either can be scum. My PoE of Nibel/Gad/Tweet stands - QED.
Click to expand...

I just feel like this should have factored into your reasoning here. The problem is if you're scum, declaring this conclusion would get resolved immediately

I kind of expect, if you're playing the game transiently, to navigate here by information on the table which you kinda just left.

But yes, here is the stack of claims

8 total actions - two missing

Action Claimed Pile
Ultra - Cop (Acted)
Flower - Vanilla Cop? (Acted)
Hime - BD (Acted)
Charles - Doc (Acted)
Cubey - Vig (Acted)
Aurelian - Self Redirector

No action claimed Pile
Nibel - DV
Gad - VT
RDK - VT
Ratchet - VT
Tweet - Developer/Graverobber (didn't act)
Polar - VT
Watson - Party (Didn't count)

QED - Split is either 1/2 or 0/2 from each respective pile
 
RDK said:
Because there's a difference between speccing mechanics and speccing balance
Click to expand...
Not in this case. Or did you overlook that there is no Watcher or Tracker? No idea why 2 Town Invests is so weird for you.
 
Ultra said:
I just feel like this should have factored into your reasoning here. The problem is if you're scum, declaring this conclusion would get resolved immediately

I kind of expect, if you're playing the game transiently, to navigate here by information on the table which you kinda just left.

But yes, here is the stack of claims

8 total actions - two missing

Action Claimed Pile
Ultra - Cop (Acted)
Flower - Vanilla Cop? (Acted)
Hime - BD (Acted)
Charles - Doc (Acted)
Cubey - Vig (Acted)
Aurelian - Self Redirector

No action claimed Pile
Nibel - DV
Gad - VT
RDK - VT
Ratchet - VT
Tweet - Developer/Graverobber (didn't act)
Polar - VT
Watson - Party (Didn't count)

QED - Split is either 1/2 or 0/2 from each respective pile
Click to expand...
Here's a theory, tweet acted, nibel did the faction kill
 
Ultra said:
I just feel like this should have factored into your reasoning here. The problem is if you're scum, declaring this conclusion would get resolved immediately

I kind of expect, if you're playing the game transiently, to navigate here by information on the table which you kinda just left.
Click to expand...
Ultra all it does is reaffirm my current worldview. I will openly concede I didn't focus or keep track of each pile - I've been operating under the assumption that there was 4 scum since before I subbed in so it didn't click to me that this would mean that. It was already in my mind I mean.
 
Flower said:
Not in this case. Or did you overlook that there is no Watcher or Tracker? No idea why 2 Town Invests is so weird for you.
Click to expand...
Because if we have a cop and a psychologist as well as Juice's role potentially (and probably likely) being used for town credit, that's a potential for like 6 town clears by Day 4 and that's not even factoring in a potential Tweet gravedigger. There's undisputedly a lot of power there so I do have to consider balance, especially during mass claim.
 
RDK said:
Because if we have a cop and a psychologist as well as Juice's role potentially (and probably likely) being used for town credit, that's a potential for like 6 town clears by Day 4 and that's not even factoring in a potential Tweet gravedigger. There's undisputedly a lot of power there so I do have to consider balance, especially during mass claim.
Click to expand...
And you are also aware that Gram approved it and does put setup traps in his game. It's just grasping at this point. Your case on me has no basis. The inactivity thing is something anyone can look up on Disc which was pre rand. This is absolutely idiotic, especially after my D1 with Cake. Go look elsewhere if you're Town, if you're scum, keep this up and I will destroy you. Just a fair warning.
 
Reader mode
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top