Mafia General Discussion: Ultra's Crucifixion

[EkkoLoJinx]

Host them on NF if it’s gonna be full of NF players

it will be a mixture of nf wg and ws players

lots of NF players moved here and some were banned

 

[Grammaton]

@Poyser @Grammaton


u wud rather use the second?

whats with ur reactions

Because this isn’t an actual problem

 

[Aries]

Just get rid of the unranked game types. Tear down these oppressive walls. I am a 5 star man!

 

[EkkoLoJinx]

Because this isn’t an actual problem

forreal? awesome.
i dont like the long descriptions but good to know that its not an issue

 

[EkkoLoJinx]

Just get rid of the unranked game types. Tear down these oppressive walls. I am a 5 star man!

there r games that will be experimental and need to be unranked lol

 

[Grammaton]

forreal? awesome.
i dont like the long descriptions but good to know that its not an issue

Do you have any other fake, non-existent problems that need urgently addressing or we good?

 

[Sigismund]

Or just do ranked like NF used to do, by just picking the best 2-3 Players, Town MVP, Scum MVP, Indie MVP, and have those choices be via the Host's judgement.
So even in a SRM game, the host can award the best players, even if 90% of the players are just afk spaming abilities

 

[EkkoLoJinx]

Do you have any other fake, non-existent problems that need urgently addressing or we good?

those were real concerns. ppl previously, me included, disliked long ability descriptions that doesnt clarify what the ability does which in turn causes the player to sometimes not bother playing / go inactive or feel overwhelmed and sub out

aside from this can we pls have a thread to explain exactly what constitutes as ranked

ty

 

[EkkoLoJinx]

Or just do ranked like NF used to do, by just picking the best 2-3 Players, Town MVP, Scum MVP, Indie MVP, and have those choices be via the Host's judgement.
So even in a SRM game, the host can award the best players, even if 90% of the players are just afk spaming abilities

i prefer mvps to be handed by a popular vote (usually a poll) and a bit of host judgement mixed in

 

[Aries]

there r games that will be experimental and need to be unranked lol

The experimental games will likely be in our section sigis/Aries and I think we will just do the rankings the way we do it on nf like sigis suggested. Poyser and gram can do their rankings the way they did in the previous forums. That way it's the best of both worlds between communities

 

[Poyser]

i prefer mvps to be handed by a popular vote (usually a poll) and a bit of host judgement mixed in

No
Have you seen champs
It’s a shambles

Go to your subsection

 

[Aries]

I think everyone but ekko is in agreement on just separating the game types. Abolish the unranked games. Poyser and co run their section how they see fit and sigis and myself do the same for our section.

 

[EkkoLoJinx]

No
Have you seen champs
It’s a shambles

Go to your subsection

do champs allow the players to pick mvp? they have judges no?

i usually prefer the players who played the game to voice who they think, from player PoV, deserves MVP and then the host gives final decision. usually its done via a poll where players of the game vote

we dont have to do this. its not important

 

[EkkoLoJinx]

I think everyone but ekko is in agreement on just separating the game types. Abolish the unranked games. Poyser and co run their section how they see fit and sigis and myself do the same for our section.

i think this is okay but it runs into the problem of players playing in both sections at the same time so we'd probably need to have one pipeline for both

 

[Aurelian]

i think this is okay but it runs into the problem of players playing in both sections at the same time so we'd probably need to have one pipeline for both

Each sub-section can hammer this out on their own. I think you are going in circles since we've already reached an agreement and everyone is satisfied.

 

[Poyser]

i think this is okay but it runs into the problem of players playing in both sections at the same time so we'd probably need to have one pipeline for both

That’s not going to happen

 

[Aries]

i think this is okay but it runs into the problem of players playing in both sections at the same time so we'd probably need to have one pipeline for both

Alternate phases or wait till a game is half way through to start yours.

 

[Magic]

thats y im asking could u like respectfully and kindly post a thread that explains exactly what a ranked game is

unranked games fill just fine. fangs game and fairy tail filled in a reasonably quick time without most of the locals here even signing up

fuji and aries games filled and ran on another site

what fang and i are asking is to expand the ranked game pool as there r setups we deem ranked worthy but arent getting enough competitiveness, which in return ruins the setup, because its not played as unranked

u dont have to call everyone who is raising a counter point or seeing things from different PoV as salty. the unranked game that we filled in this site had more players and subs than any ranked game so u r not even factually correct

I just explained. What more do you want

 

[Poyser]

Alternate phases or wait till a game is half way through to start yours.

He means have one queue between both of our sections lol

Makes no sense

 

[EkkoLoJinx]

Each sub-section can hammer this out on their own. I think you are going in circles since we've already reached an agreement and everyone is satisfied.

That’s not going to happen

its going to result in a considerable decline in player count

we'll see hopefully im wrong

atleast we can synch day and night phases so the day in one game can be the night in another hopefully