I'mma be real, I thought this was based on Becca and Lucy in general, which is why I have them on par with each other. If this is based on who had better chemistry with David, then that's obviously Lucy. The show made that abundantly clear.To be fair to me (as a total unbiased perspective ofc) I can see Rebecca's worth, but her Chemistry with David was not as good as Lucy's.
Also the Final Scene on the moon did endear me to Lucy quite a bit. Losing everything you held dear to achieve you dreams, only to realize it wasn't worth it is a Kino story to me lol
Yeah, and it looks like it'll remain speculation, for now. If a global flood genuinely occurred, there would be evidence for it everywhere that would be simple for us to spot, given our current methods. All we've ended up getting, is the regions with past human settlements, which would ultimately go on to expand out into the much broader groups of people we have today, each dealing with their own particularly bad, localized floods, which became a deeply rooted memory that ultimately became mythologized as a 'global flood' when, based off everything we've discovered, it was seemingly anything but.(This could change in the future, when our tech and methods improve, but as of now, a global flood happening in humanity's past seems highly unlikely, based on a lot of factors)It's honestly why during COV-ID, alot more people became religious instead of becoming atheists... oh wait.
Seriously, this shit is consistently why people despise Atheists at their core, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that every Mythology has some basis in reality based on actual evidence that it happened?
Every religion talks about a Great Flood that happened in the past and it's been highly speculated that there has in fact been a Great Flood of that magnitude in Human History. The Greeks talk about the battles of Troy and while it's hard to say if the people existed, there is very much speculation Troy was a real place. The Bible explicitly uses real people and real events with, as many others stated, Herod, Tiberius, Rome, Nero, Xerxes, etc, etc.
It's like trying to act like most scientists aren't religious when it's a well known fact that most of the greatest known scientists... is religious and explicitly believe in a higher power and even go to that route as just because something is explained, doesn't mean they know for certain that's where the mustard comes from.
I hope that shit turns out to be real,would be cool the idea of coming from giants might be a thingShit damn it says something that there might have actually existed legitimate giants in the past. Something that also tends to appear in multiple mythologies.
Yeah, and it looks like it'll remain speculation, for now. If a global flood genuinely occurred, there would be evidence for it everywhere that would be simple for us to spot, given our current methods. All we've ended up getting, is the regions with past human settlements, which would ultimately go on to expand out into the much broader groups of people we have today, each dealing with their own particularly bad, localized floods, which became a deeply rooted memory that ultimately became mythologized as a 'global flood' when, based off everything we've discovered, it was seemingly anything but.(This could change in the future, when our tech and methods improve, but as of now, a global flood happening in humanity's past seems highly unlikely, based on a lot of factors)
As for Troy, there's a lot more evidence for that genuinely being a thing, along with the war, but the exact details we just aren't sure of. Probably never will be, sadly, unless we invent time travel at some point.
What we do know, is that Homer's account, on some level, had to be accurate, as the dude gave the exact location of where Troy was, and the research conducted there has made it clear that battles have absolutely taken place there.
As for scientists, to go on a tangent here, I do love how most atheists who are incredibly vocal try real hard to come off as more intelligent, for following science, but only prove they don't understand it at all, as the sheer amount of times I've seen these idiots talk in absolutes, when in science, due to its ever evolving nature with us still having a LOT of shit left to discover about the universe, any real scientist worth their salt will tell you, there IS no absolutes.
My favorite being whenever any of them say some variation of "With science, we can definitively prove that God or Gods don't exist." and I'm just like "No, you can't? Did you retards miss the most fundamental principle of proper science, in your attempt to lash out at religious people?" And then I remember that most of these niggas don't usually follow proper science that truly seeks to fully understand the world we live in. They instead follow "The Science" most of the time, because it, hilariously and ironically, supports their beliefs. Which they claim to not have.
Stupidity at its finest, from people who want to believe themselves smarter than they are.![]()
Kakashi's speech is about how revenge as a whole is bad and never ends well. Of course, Kakashi contradicted himself or changed his mind for some people with Shikamaru. Lets be real though Kakashi contradicted himself.
Kishi wants Sasuke to be viewed as bad or mentally unstable at this point which is why he has Sasuke fight Naruto which imo is not well written. Sasuke's hatred should be laser focused on Itachi the one that beat the shit out of him and put him in coma. Thinking of Naruto and his growth is forced. This is all for Naruto vs Sasuke build up.
Kishi fails with Kakashi's speech because he doesn't address what Itachi did to Sasuke only that Sasuke's revenge is bad and he shouldn't use Chidori on teammates despite Naruto using Rasengan on Sasuke all the same. Naruto could have easily avoided Sasuke without Rasengan because Sasuke was in the air falling...
Its perfectly normal to want revenge on someone that beat the fuck out of you and put you in a coma. If Sasuke said "Oh well" and moved on along it would not make sense.
Kakashi doesn't address it because he would have to admit Sasuke was justified. Thats not what Kishimoto wants. He wants Sasuke to look bad hence why the discussion is only about revenge and the rooftop fight. Even then only focusing on the things Sasuke did wrong. It doesn't make sense.
After reading through this several times with multiple discussions and topics on it I have realized this.
Goliath is indeed possible.I personally do believe things like Nephilim described in the Bible or Goliath were real
Let's be real atheists only a thing because nerds were taken to church on SundaysYeah, and it looks like it'll remain speculation, for now. If a global flood genuinely occurred, there would be evidence for it everywhere that would be simple for us to spot, given our current methods. All we've ended up getting, is the regions with past human settlements, which would ultimately go on to expand out into the much broader groups of people we have today, each dealing with their own particularly bad, localized floods, which became a deeply rooted memory that ultimately became mythologized as a 'global flood' when, based off everything we've discovered, it was seemingly anything but.(This could change in the future, when our tech and methods improve, but as of now, a global flood happening in humanity's past seems highly unlikely, based on a lot of factors)
As for Troy, there's a lot more evidence for that genuinely being a thing, along with the war, but the exact details we just aren't sure of. Probably never will be, sadly, unless we invent time travel at some point.
What we do know, is that Homer's account, on some level, had to be accurate, as the dude gave the exact location of where Troy was, and the research conducted there has made it clear that battles have absolutely taken place there.
As for scientists, to go on a tangent here, I do love how most atheists who are incredibly vocal try real hard to come off as more intelligent, for following science, but only prove they don't understand it at all, as the sheer amount of times I've seen these idiots talk in absolutes, when in science, due to its ever evolving nature with us still having a LOT of shit left to discover about the universe, any real scientist worth their salt will tell you, there IS no absolutes.
My favorite being whenever any of them say some variation of "With science, we can definitively prove that God or Gods don't exist." and I'm just like "No, you can't? Did you retards miss the most fundamental principle of proper science, in your attempt to lash out at religious people?" And then I remember that most of these niggas don't usually follow proper science that truly seeks to fully understand the world we live in. They instead follow "The Science" most of the time, because it, hilariously and ironically, supports their beliefs. Which they claim to not have.
Stupidity at its finest, from people who want to believe themselves smarter than they are.![]()
Watch and read In Search of the Trojan War. A little dated but its conclusions have only become more accurate with time.As for Troy, there's a lot more evidence for that genuinely being a thing, along with the war, but the exact details we just aren't sure of. Probably never will be, sadly, unless we invent time travel at some point.
What we do know, is that Homer's account, on some level, had to be accurate, as the dude gave the exact location of where Troy was, and the research conducted there has made it clear that battles have absolutely taken place there.