but u just said ur not invested in lynching her....
but u just said ur not invested in lynching her....Yeah ans I also said I didn't say I town read her, I leaned more she's scum. I'm waiting for Ultra to explain why he wants me to vote Luka.
Never trusting Geico ever againI’ve faked such confidence before!
I said I'm not invested in saving her either, the same post you quoted says I want her resolved.but u just said ur not invested in lynching her....
I didn't say I would ,I want to know why he doesn't want me to vote Sky while pushing me to vote Luka insteadWhy do you need Ultra to tell you who to vote?
kinda sounds like you're invested in lynching her thenI said I'm not invested in saving her either, the same post you quoted says I want her resolved.
I did say I lean more she's scummy then towniekinda sounds like you're invested in lynching her then1:
There's this thing called tags, Poy
You know how to use 'em
A wise choice! Our kind will say anything to get what we want.Never trusting Geico ever again
Kind of a schizo reads here but I think I have employed this before successfully - I don't buy that these posts a minute apart are spontaneous. I think it's more likely you had this angle and your entrance prepared.
Ehhhh I think you misread that post in its entirety. Bachi isn't exactly Indi hunting, he's saying I'm "at best" Indi, which is more of an implied town read (I think?). The read in question of Ratchet's is also about Watson.
I feel like you're posting like you have a rod up your ass and aren't showing much nuance or genuine though into anything you've posted. Not a fan of your entrance. You're showing more initiative, but it feels like you're overcompensating
Don't care, I've read you as scum accurately without them, and you have said this in your defense as well.
Down to yote luka
Don't see how I meaningfully could, and I'm certainly not going to read Luka favorably off of casing someone with one post if that's kinda where you're going here
"Portray progression"
You're an artist painting on a blank canvas. He popped a vote on a guy and dipped. Think you're trying to sound more scholarly than necessary here, because you're scum.
Hard not to read every single post you've made as disingenuous, you're a bit more aggressive than last game but I basically feel like all your reads are backwards induction
...Wasn't poyser just at the top of your town list?
Eh
Not actually that hard to reconcile as you're framing it, considering you started questioning him, he could just take that as a token to start pushing some mutual shade even if it's utterly inconsistent, and the fact that he has TMI that his shade is correct would inspire confidence in taking that shift in position.
@Aurelian this is whyAlright just a quick sanity check here
Luka's early posts:
Luka's later posts, under pressure:
...How does anyone not see a massive shift in what content is being produced here?
Like, the first 10 minutes of the game they are making posts that try to sound legitimate, rubber stamped, but then shortly devolve into complete nonsense when live posting
Here's what I think happened - because the first group of posts all occured in like the span of 10 minutes which is crazy - I think Luka had scoped out the thread a bit and already figured out some talking points to use.
Then the moment he ran out of cue cards it's pure drivel and OMGUS lol
Why are you doing Ultra's job for him exactly and why are you voting me@Aurelian this is why
there's this thing called the who replied feature retroWho all has not posted
Asking a question is inactive hunting now. Cool and epicAnd why are you inactivfag hunting now
kinda sounds like you're invested in lynching her then1:
I can't keep isoing Sky's posts or I'll die from cringe, legitimately my position is she's way too fucking defensive and reactive to questions even compared to the last game she was town or a few games before that one where Hime hosted.
The vibe I get scrolling through the first 15 or so pages is how easily she gets worked up and inserts herself into any possible discussion: stuffing involving Polar, Ekko, Prof, etc...comes off as blatant busywork to come off townie.
As for Lethal I do believe this is tic for tac his classic scum meta:
- Doesn't really provide any commitment to pushing his scum read on me
- Has ducked out of the thread for long intervals only to pop on and make little snips and jabs then anything constructive
- Parallels to past games like Ratchet's FF game where he flounders in the spotlight
Don't mind lynching him alternatively to Sky
The reason is already given: you think I'm scum. You based this off angleshooting me because the game started while I was away at work.
You dismissed my ISO and interactions on Sky and handwaved it off. I gave my thoughts on Lethal's Miller claim to Gram based off precedent and experience with Haza's last hosted game where I was duped by my Mason partner being the GF.
You think I'm scum because I haven't replicated the same entrance as past games when I was around when the game started and attribute this to me being cowardly.
Also Alco is a dirty B*lgian and I never backtracked on anything.
I gave my reads on you, Ratchet, Ultra, Sky, and Lethal earlier. You might think it's fluff but I was prodding Prof for his weak town read on Ratchet.
Actually I have another reason for prodding Prof with a claim he made but your still ignoring Sky iso.
Actually the original vote was fluff but the justifications in keeping it there was her busywork attempts at inserting herself into different discussions. Which came off as forced and scummy to me. You also sidestepped around my question to her asking why Evans town reading her made him scum in her eyes which she never responded back on.
You've changed your votes a lot this day phase. Also you didn't refute the fact I was voting you earlier to try and damage control by saying it happened after my wagon.Unvote
Vote Aurelian
Yeah nah, pretending like you can't read when it's been spelled out in front of you is trash
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?