not talking to him, talking to others about himWhy do I need to have formed a solid conclusion less than a third of the way through Day 1? Is this a real thought? You don't see why I would want to engage with him from different angles to develop a read?
What do you make of Poyser pushing Prof?Flower
Sparkles
Guillo
Ratchet
Ekko
Poyser
Prof
Mango
Understand I havent read 3/4ths of the game
what negative reception?Poyser only brought this up after he got some negative reception to his read just fyi
Think he tried testing the waters to see if he could get something going on X and then "remembered" that his behavior is in town range. Poyser's model of X's town play is that he aggressively and badly tunnels people, so I don't buy that he didn't consider this when he pitched the idea he was scum for suspecting Flower.
Not a fan of his angle on Prof either but dunno how familiar Poyser is with his play
NothingWhat do you make of Poyser pushing Prof?
what negative reception?
My vote on them had nothing to do with the push on XGuillo and Luka voted for you, Sparkles and other players interjected with a town read on X
you've got to be taking the pissGuillo and Luka voted for you, Sparkles and other players interjected with a town read on X
Makes sense. Would say it's not unusual though, it's early days still.Probably not as easy lol. Any paranoia is less about that and just general paranoia lol.
You’re not pushing any strong direction and in a bit of back seat would be more of the source
Why is that even remotely a problem? Helps me read him better and helps me read them too, also don't think I've done this all that often. Have mostly been actually defending my takes on his play when you have questioned why it leads to my belief.not talking to him, talking to others about him
why did u ask this?Does it usually seem to end in a tie or no vote on the first day?
@.guillo @Flower did u guys respond to this? pls do if notconsidering im pushing posyer far more than luka is how do u think that post aged?
flower made that post when i was catching up. i saw a good post by luka and said i agreed with his push on poyser, thats about it tbh
Well no, I ask because it's pretty asinine. You're posting as if I have to have a confirmed, hard read on his slot not even halfway into the first day phase, ignoring that my attempts are probably to help solidify that read. So ya, is it a real thought Poyser?In fact
vote ratchet
I can see prof being town and ratchet basically using him as an easy talking point here. I think the "is this a real thought" part of his last post was just in bad faith
Payton Manning!!! Broncos!!!!!In Weebs 22 Mango and I formed an unbreakable bond. It saddens me to see him these days, like watching Payton Manning at the end.
Except I didn't say that, you've just decided to frame it that way. What I actually said is you've posted about him a lot without really forming a conclusion and have done a lot of hedging. I didn't say you had to have a solid read, I said you're talking about him a lot for someone you don't have a solid read on.Well no, I ask because it's pretty asinine. You're posting as if I have to have a confirmed, hard read on his slot not even halfway into the first day phase, ignoring that my attempts are probably to help solidify that read. So ya, is it a real thought Poyser?
also you read prof town?
Uh, your post:Except I didn't say that, you've just decided to frame it that way. What I actually said is you've posted about him a lot without really forming a conclusion and have done a lot of hedging. I didn't say you had to have a solid read, I said you're talking about him a lot for someone you don't have a solid read on.
Emphasis mine.It comes from thinking you seem to have talked about him a lot without ever really forming a solid conclusion, going back and forth, hedging etc. You seem to be fairly intimately familiar with him, so part of me thinks you feel like you have to talk about him as you'd be expected to because otherwise I don't really see the point of it
you've got to be taking the piss
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?