brother you can keep repeating this ad nauseum as if that was what I was saying, it still doesn't make it true.
brother you can keep repeating this ad nauseum as if that was what I was saying, it still doesn't make it true.Like it's just nonsense, I'm almost always right on Prof which is why I want to be careful with the read. There is absolutely 0 urgency to have a clearly defined, strong read, this early in the game.
susPocket me, pokemon
Like I really can't with this lmao, why would I be talking about him (and to him) if I had a solid read on him? In fact, the moment I said he was improving up into my town reads (i.e. the read was becoming more solid) you questioned it, so I don't even know if you know what your contention is supposed to be here.I didn't say you had to have a solid read, I said you're talking about him a lot for someone you don't have a solid read on.
yeah that guillo/sparkles tag team really scared me off my pushConcession accepted
no@Poyser have you ever seen Prof as scum?
Your position, verbatim, is that I'm using him as an easy talking point because my read isn't solid and I'm talking too much about him for a read that isn't solid. That's what you said, at least. I'm waiting for you to explain why that's scummy.brother you can keep repeating this ad nauseum as if that was what I was saying, it still doesn't make it true.
i didn't have a problem with the read? well other than disagreeing with it, but that's not my point anyway. read my postsIssue with the Ratchet angle is that I have basically made the same read at the same time and we‘ve both seen Prof as anything, so I don’t see why it can’t just be a correct read from your pov.
yeah that guillo/sparkles tag team really scared me off my pushembarrassing
you wrote a whole ass case then at the wnd relegated it to vibes while hoppig on the top wagonI agree that Posyer feels off. I spent like the first hour lurking and the whole time it felt like he was awkwardly kind of floating around for an opening that wasn’t happening with the way he floated out stuff with Dest/Sparkles on why he was hesitant to town read them.
Part of it is vibes lol
Why is it scummy to use somebody you find it easy to talk about to generate content?Your position, verbatim, is that I'm using him as an easy talking point because my read isn't solid and I'm talking too much about him for a read that isn't solid. That's what you said, at least. I'm waiting for you to explain why that's scummy.
Let's get itIn fact
vote ratchet
I can see prof being town and ratchet basically using him as an easy talking point here. I think the "is this a real thought" part of his last post was just in bad faith
whyI think Dest is probably town.
No, your position is that it's scummy I have spoken about Prof as much as I have, without having a solid read on the slot. I would argue that's backwards - me not having a solid read is precisely why I've committed real estate to him, and I don't believe you can't possibly imagine this as a scenario. By your own words, you could only see scum motivation, which I find to be a pretty ridiculous position that you haven't actually tried to defend. You've just said it was "bad faith" to question it...like you quoted both of my posts as if they contradicted each other despite the fact they matched perfectly
Yeah, why is it only scummy? That's your position here, that you can't imagine a scenario where it isn't scum motivated. Despite, you know, outlining why I would have a reason to do so as Town (the read is not solidified). There is no twisting here, you're the one who by your own admission, can't connect simple dots.Why is it scummy to use somebody you find it easy to talk about to generate content?
Like I said, it felt like you were talking about him a lot because you felt obligated to. I understand that's my perception that you're not going to agree with, but I think the way you've kept trying to twist what I said is slimy as fuck
Why do you need to wait for Poyser to vote?Let's get it
vote lynch: ratchet
Prof lurks all the time.also when have you ever lurked
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?