• We're looking for artists. Direct message Dr. Watson for more info!

Game Warcraft 3: The Full Story

@MangoSenpai is this your complete claim?
As in my actions or my role?

Either way, What I have claimed in the open was

Arthas Menethil
Doctor -

N1: AFK
N2: Ratchet
N3: Cataclysm
N4: AFK
N5: Pot
N6: Self

I've 2 passives in addition to my doctor, which is unlimited use with the caveat that I can't use it on the same target twice in a row. One of them is immunity to culting, and the second is "an eye for an eye" where if I get killed during the night I can bring someone down with me - which I softed at EoD5.
I hope scums kills me tonight so that I can get my sweet release
they didn't bite tho.


That is my full claim.
 
Are you searching for a mislynch or what?
I understand you're not cult leader because Sparkles said so but tell me what makes you town and why did you ping me yesterday to vote Gad when my vote were already on him?
Why are you trying to flip the script on me here?

Why should I explain myself to you, why I am town?


As for the ping you're talking about, I was pinging those who were voting elsewhere or not voting at all - seems I included you by mistake. What of it?
6- @Sparkles
9- @Alexis2282AE
15- @Sigismund Replaced by @Pot Goblin
22- @Magic Replaced by @Lethal
23- @Pqwerty
25- @Kurosaki Ichigo

Vote GAD and come one step closer to the promised Town Victory!

I can't read much now.

I know Luka started to put me since yesterday in cult POE probably to redirect the attention from himself so I am not against his wagon.
So are you proposing Luka as the lynch candidate?

Is that what you're eluding to?


I'll be honest, Ichigo, your responses are not looking very promising

All you've been trying to do is to flip the narrative, walk around the actual accusations, make very vague and non-descript claims about your actions. Trying to throw shade at me for "not remembering your claim" when that was never stated anywhere, it was merely your assumption.

Right now you're just stalling for time, but you're really struggling to find foothold.

I think you're just cooked tbh. You need to come with the case of the century to convince me to go elswhere
 
GAD had this ability:

[Active - Infernal Explosion] In the event of your lynch, you will explode and kill your last voter. If you are left alive with one more mafia member then you will also burn another player of your choice and they will die a cycle later.

Which ironically Goddessblade might've been the best last voter we could hope for since we will get her back temporarily.

But what gives me a little pause is the night kills, more specifically the targets.

Death of the betrayer
EO0efedX0AAB8Wd.jpg:large



@Sparkles /

Illidan Stormrage

has been killed





@Grammaton / Tichondrius has been killed



Day 7 begins
You have 48 hours to discuss
With 10 players alive it takes 6 votes for majority
GAD had the extra kill ability, and that should've been used on Aurelian/ Cal from what I recall.

So then, Sparkles has been quite transparently been the "anti-cult" role from D1, so the faction who has most stocks in this kill is obviously Cult.

But then Gram also kicks the bucket, and things just doesn't add up..

Anyone got some thoughts around this?
 
Because I was the one who provided the numbers? I still have them if you want to see them again.
Well sure, you could do that. But in the future, try to avoid answering for people, you never know if someone said something they weren't supposed to, or struggle to find where the information comes from.

But well, you have already answered for him now, so I can't test him on that now.
 
I claimed long ago. Where is your attention if you don't know this?

My action with 4 shots is a block or crush of the first action used by my target.
The other one is delaying an action used on me 1 cycle and I didn't use it.
Both have exceptions on kills and conversions, they don't work on these
β˜€οΈπŸŠ 🍎🌈🐘 🐝🍊🌳🏠 🍊🐟 πŸŒ³πŸ πŸ˜β˜€οΈπŸ˜ πŸŽπŸš—πŸŒ³πŸ¦πŸ…πŸ˜β˜€οΈ 🍊🌈 πŸ§πŸŽβ˜€οΈβ˜€οΈπŸ¦πŸ…πŸ˜β˜€οΈ πŸŽπŸŒƒπŸΆ 🐢🍊 β˜‚οΈ πŸ πŸŽπŸ…πŸ˜ πŸŒƒπŸŠ πŸ§πŸŽβ˜€οΈβ˜€οΈπŸ¦πŸ…πŸ˜β˜€οΈ

πŸŽπŸŒƒπŸΆ πŸš—πŸŽπŸŒƒ β˜‚οΈ πŸš—πŸžπŸŽπŸ¦πŸŒ• πŸ›ΆπŸŠβ˜‚οΈπŸŒˆ β˜‚οΈβ˜€οΈπŸŽπŸ‡πŸ˜
 
Well sure, you could do that. But in the future, try to avoid answering for people, you never know if someone said something they weren't supposed to, or struggle to find where the information comes from.

But well, you have already answered for him now, so I can't test him on that now.
True, but if it was information I provided 300 pages ago, can it be used as an accurate test?
 
Back
Top