Game Ranked Fallout New Vegas Mafia

[Flower]

Pein assuming Town colour is green makes me think he's just scum again like in DN and hasn't read the Town sample PM on the opening post.

 

[Ratchet]

After a quick wiki dive, Psychic's character doesn't really seem to jive with mine. Hers is the leader of the Brotherhood, whatever that means.

 

[Flower]

So it's just conjecture on your part and not based on anything else?

What do you hope to gain from questioning this?

 

[RDK]

Doesn't matter.
Like I said.
Green is almost always the town color.

literally only one game on this site (I think there's been 6 or 7 now) that has been the case

it's been indie color just as much

'almost always'

talking shite

 

[RDK]

@T-Pein™ u caught any live ones yet

 

[Grammaton]

T-Pein says I have 10 posts but didn’t bother to iso any of them. He’s coming after me after I claimed my role. He’s probably scum with PheN0M.

Indeed. Can I get a protect tonight? Thanks

You’re not going to be protected tbh

 

[Flower]

@Grammaton thoughts on Tweet's line of questioning regarding my non hostile fake claim posts?

 

[Gaddamnit]

I don't give a fuck and cba going through 900+ posts of shit to HUNT or SOLVE anything atm, so you can take it or leave it. But thanks for keeping tabs on me. You got any idea where I put my stapler today in the office? I think it fell down the back of the desk but it's a bitch to check behind there as it opposes a female coworker who always wears a skirt, and well, danger zone.

Damn...

@Gadministraitor come vote Lethal.

Yes baby. Vote Lynch Lethal

See Ratchet is wolf lol.

Wut?

lethal lowkey being too mean.
isnt that his " I am town" meta?

Is it?

As per original post, no explanations will be provided. But you're nice.

GUT and hunch from my read through. I have no posts to back them up cos I just stopped quoting when the wagon formed and I gave up actually trying. I'm cosy with my list and look forward to seeing how right I am.

I wish I was a stump this game

You're not even trying?

Doesn't matter.
Like I said.
Green is almost always the town color.

This shouldn't be a valid argument for whatever point it is you're tryna make

I didn’t run away from thread. I had things to do and site was down. Idk everyone said I was indie. I already claim town.

Any idea why they think you're indie?

I'm actually more confident on T-Pein being scum than Lethal fwiw - cba with lethal's attitude though

Quoting this for... reasons

 

[Grammaton]

Er, I don’t really see anything wrong with it?

 

[Grammaton]

@Hans Tweetenberg could you address ratchets query on your saying he looks like his SK game pls

 

[Flower]

Er, I don’t really see anything wrong with it?

Why, though?

I say non hostile Indies have no fake claims.
He asks why I know this.
I name my reasons.
He still questions this.

All is implying he implies I slipped on something. But if I did that, the only thing I could slip on was of being a non hostile Indie because only non hostile Indies would know what non hostile Indies have for claims. But what's the point of going after a potential non hostile Indie as Town? They're no threats to Town.

 

[Grammaton]

Why, though?

I say non hostile Indies have no fake claims.
He asks why I know this.
I name my reasons.
He still questions this.

All is implying he implies I slipped on something. But if I did that, the only thing I could slip on was of being a non hostile Indie because only non hostile Indies would know what non hostile Indies have for claims. But what's the point of going after a potential non hostile Indie as Town? They're no threats to Town.

Respectfully, I don’t really care about any of this lol

 

[Aurelian]

Did Lethal claim? I've been trying to make sense of RDK's weird posts.

 

[Ratchet]

Did Lethal claim? I've been trying to make sense of RDK's weird posts.

Vanilla.

 

[RDK]

Why, though?

I say non hostile Indies have no fake claims.
He asks why I know this.
I name my reasons.
He still questions this.

All is implying he implies I slipped on something. But if I did that, the only thing I could slip on was of being a non hostile Indie because only non hostile Indies would know what non hostile Indies have for claims. But what's the point of going after a potential non hostile Indie as Town? They're no threats to Town.

idk where you're getting the idea tweet is presenting a 'gotcha'?

seems like you're jumping to a premature and overly defensive position based upon his posts

 

[Emil]

Don‘t really think they fit all that well into maj lynch setups.

actually agree majority lynch seems kinda sux with multiball

Like, look, if I humour this:
None of this is supported anywhere. Why does it not bode well? Because he says so? My progression on Psychic has absolutely nothing to do with my treatment of him, conflating the two together to make a point is purely to mislead the players who are skimming over this excessively long post and think there is some substance there. Not really any other explanation for it as far as I can tell.

it doesnt bode well because ur main scum reads for the day were psychic who u said doesn't look nervous and me who u said is a policy read. the point is very clear here. ur contribution today is lackluster. both the scum reads are tied because they r urs???

This is a loaded preposition, and a false dichotomy to boot. He hasn't begun to establish why these are the only two possibilities - for example I could be frustrated with him, or busy enough to want to try to be efficient, instead he sets the mark at either laziness or scum. Why? Who knows.

arent u the one who doesnt spite and who plays each game differently? what have i dont this game to warrant u being "frustrate"? it seems clear laziness on ur end or simply scum. if u r gna claim u r being frustrated then that frustration can never be on anything i did this game. if so, show me what. otherwise its disgenuine asfk

This is just straight up nonsense - I have more reason than most players to be dismissive of Ekko, given our shared history. It's again loaded, insisting that my position can't possibly be genuine without establishing why that is (to be fair, he will have a hard time in general doing this because he can't possibly factor in external factors that might contribute to this, but then it begs the question why he is jumping to the idea that it's ingenuine instead of something more intangible).

every game is different. i have no reason to belive u are dismissive cuz of my gameplay here. if u r being the way u r for out of game related reason im happy to just have ur slot vanish here. could care less to deal with this shite

This is easily the worst portion of his posts. Listing out multiple thought processes that all start from the same premise (that being Ratchet=Scum) is at best laddering his argument - coming up with three different reasons scum Ratchet might want to do this means little when he hasn't first established that these are the only three scenarios possible, or that they're even the three most likely to be in play. The reason I say this is the worst part, however, and not just simply nonsense, is because it's also inherently manipulative. By writing them out like this, he gives the impression to people that he is giving more thought to analysing the situation than he has, because on an initial skim it comes across as hin having explored multiple angles to this and came to the conclusion that a scum one fits the best. In reality, it's all the same angle, just extrapolated three different ways.

the second reason is a town ratchet motive, but its very butchered by you. am i the one jumping to conclusions here or is it u? arent u the one being dismissive? if i reached a conclusion on ur slot why bother talking to u more? actually i havent even voted u yet. btw this wall of text says nothing. whats manipulative about my reasoning? did i convince anyone to think anyway about u? its not an "impression" im giving, its the reality of it. ur responses have been weak af lol


tl;dr - u can cry me a river. the one thing that needs to be established here is not why i think what i think about ur posts, but rather why or what posts of mine cause said "frustration" reaction from u. like i said we had not interacted outside of me asking u what a nervous psychic looks like which soon after u started crying about and dismissing prematurely then tell me my reading comprehension fails me only to dismiss that again when asked further, then tell me im espouting nonsense only yet for the third time unable to pin an exact post of mine that points to what u accuse me of

 

[Grammaton]

actually agree majority lynch seems kinda sux with multiball

it doesnt bode well because ur main scum reads for the day were psychic who u said doesn't look nervous and me who u said is a policy read. the point is very clear here. ur contribution today is lackluster. both the scum reads are tied because they r urs???


arent u the one who doesnt spite and who plays each game differently? what have i dont this game to warrant u being "frustrate"? it seems clear laziness on ur end or simply scum. if u r gna claim u r being frustrated then that frustration can never be on anything i did this game. if so, show me what. otherwise its disgenuine asfk


every game is different. i have no reason to belive u are dismissive cuz of my gameplay here. if u r being the way u r for out of game related reason im happy to just have ur slot vanish here. could care less to deal with this shite


the second reason is a town ratchet motive, but its very butchered by you. am i the one jumping to conclusions here or is it u? arent u the one being dismissive? if i reached a conclusion on ur slot why bother talking to u more? actually i havent even voted u yet. btw this wall of text says nothing. whats manipulative about my reasoning? did i convince anyone to think anyway about u? its not an "impression" im giving, its the reality of it. ur responses have been weak af lol


tl;dr - u can cry me a river. the one thing that needs to be established here is not why i think what i think about ur posts, but rather why or what posts of mine cause said "frustration" reaction from u. like i said we had not interacted outside of me asking u what a nervous psychic looks like which soon after u started crying about and dismissing prematurely then tell me my reading comprehension fails me only to dismiss that again when asked further, then tell me im espouting nonsense only yet for the third time unable to pin an exact post of mine that points to what u accuse me of

I’ll save you both a job

Interacting with you can be a chore

I’m inclined to think your questioning was genuine on this occasion (insofar as genuine questioning is with you), and I’m currently inclined to think his reaction was too

Do something else pls

 

[Emil]

This characterisation is pretty silly though - Ekko "got me lynched" by breaking the rules of the game *and* with hard mech I had nothing to fight against with. Unless Ultra has included exactly this, after claiming that all lie detectors are bad by default, in this game, Ekko getting me lynched Day 1 probably isn't all that much a concern to me. Even Ekko admits he wouldn't have gotten his lynch without the mech evidence (which was a stacked deck). Moreover, you've seen scum me happily engage with Ekko many, many times - so I don't think this is a thought you've properly fleshed out or developed.

we had mango as a wagon that game

if we dont have anyone as a wagon over u, lynching u wont be as hard as u make it seem to be

instead of posturing u can feel free to address my points so we dont have to go in circles on this

 

[Grammaton]

Btw lethals scum so yeah

 

[TAT]

More votes on Lethal please

If you expect us all to dive in to Ekko vs Ratchet where they are trying to convince ??? of their viewpoint or something something flavour/indy spec then BOOOOORING