Game Ranked Fallout New Vegas Mafia

Ratchet · Mar 9, 2023

Flower said:
Why can‘t it be Town Ekko genuinely trying to analyze different angles?

It would help to read the full post, before responding:

Ratchet said:
because on an initial skim it comes across as hin having explored multiple angles to this and came to the conclusion that a scum one fits the best. In reality, it's all the same angle, just extrapolated three different ways.

Emphasis mine.

Flower said:
You see, you accuse him of shading you and that he already came to the conclusion you‘re scum, but here you are doing the same thing. You‘re not trying to see it from a Town Ekko pov.

I'm not really - I've never advertised my vote as more than a policy lynch, which means I can at the very least accept that there is a false positive at work here. Moreover, I was asked why I felt it nonsense - the purpose of that post was to establish this. My objection with Ekko is that he has presented his arguments as if there are only one of a set number of scenarios at play - all bad for me. I have not done this.

Flower said:
Your posts feel like a glorified excuse not to interact with him in the game. I can see this from a Town you perspective as well given your history, but so far nothing warrants this kind of reaction since it‘s not even a heated argument yet.

Is your opinion supposed to hold any value to me? I don't need to be in a heated argument to be dismissive of Ekko here.

Flower said:
If you‘re Town, what are you even doing?

Instead of this, have you got anything useful to say about the rest of my post, or can I just proceed to ignore further interactions with you on this now and skip the boring bits?

Ratchet · Mar 9, 2023

TAT said:
I don't think Ekko has been that bad tbh

This can probably go too - has absolutely nothing useful to say but sideline commentary like this.

Is there a reason why all of you have just ignored the actual meat of the posts I've made this morning, specifically around Tweet, and instead opted to focus on this? Regardless of what you think, I've outlined why I think what I think, so if you're so interested in this, that should be what's addressed.

Lethal · Mar 9, 2023

TAT said:
Oh you can fall asleep sure, what a mighty talented guy you must be to react to Odo's post while asleep, then slink away for 18-24 hours...

Sounds like a bit of fake anger, classic defence mechanism for scum tbh

unvote vote lynch Lethal

Um I woke up for that you dumb ****. Try some logic once in your life.

Stupid reason to justify a vote. Classic mechanism for clueless twat with nothing else to go off.

Lethal · Mar 9, 2023

Ratchet said:
This can probably go too - has absolutely nothing useful to say but sideline commentary like this.

Is there a reason why all of you have just ignored the actual meat of the posts I've made this morning, specifically around Tweet, and instead opted to focus on this? Regardless of what you think, I've outlined why I think what I think, so if you're so interested in this, that should be what's addressed.

Cos he's an opportunistic little piss ant who is incapable of original thought

Ratchet · Mar 9, 2023

Lethal said:
Um I woke up for that you dumb ****. Try some logic once in your life.

Stupid reason to justify a vote. Classic mechanism for clueless twat with nothing else to go off.

Lethal said:
Cos he's an opportunistic little piss ant who is incapable of original thought

Okay but where does this vitriol come from?

TAT · Mar 9, 2023

Ratchet said:
This can probably go too - has absolutely nothing useful to say but sideline commentary like this.

Is there a reason why all of you have just ignored the actual meat of the posts I've made this morning, specifically around Tweet, and instead opted to focus on this? Regardless of what you think, I've outlined why I think what I think, so if you're so interested in this, that should be what's addressed.

You're making a bunch of posts, I don't agree with them, simple

Lethal said:
Um I woke up for that you dumb ****. Try some logic once in your life.

Stupid reason to justify a vote. Classic mechanism for clueless twat with nothing else to go off.

You're absolutely rattled

You got nothing to you, just a wannabe me from back in the day

Ratchet · Mar 9, 2023

TAT said:
You're making a bunch of posts, I don't agree with them, simple

As this is relevant why, exactly? Am I Scum or Town?

Flower · Mar 9, 2023

Ratchet said:
Emphasis mine.

Semantics.

Ratchet said:
I'm not really - I've never advertised my vote as more than a policy lynch, which means I can at the very least accept that there is a false positive at work here. Moreover, I was asked why I felt it nonsense - the purpose of that post was to establish this. My objection with Ekko is that he has presented his arguments as if there are only one of a set number of scenarios at play - all bad for me. I have not done this.

And Ekko also considers you could be Town in his posts. He just arrived at the conclusion that you‘re more likely scum than Town. Which is a fine conclusion to arrive at given your actions in the game so far don‘t exactly scream Town. If they‘re bad, why don‘t you prove him wrong with logic and by being proactive instead of being all that dismissive?

Ratchet said:
Instead of this, have you got anything useful to say about the rest of my post, or can I just proceed to ignore further interactions with you on this now and skip the boring bits?

And here you go again, being dismissive.

Now, what are your reads so far and with reasons, please.

Lethal · Mar 9, 2023

Ratchet said:
Okay but where does this vitriol come from?

The heart. He's trash.

Lethal · Mar 9, 2023

TAT said:
You're absolutely rattled

So scared of a punk ass bitch

TAT · Mar 9, 2023

Ratchet said:
As this is relevant why, exactly? Am I Scum or Town?

I thought Ekko narrowed down the wagon choices quite well

as for you I don't know, would have to look at your posts again

TAT · Mar 9, 2023

anyway it's important that Town converge and eventually agree with a wagon, we got about 18 hours including the time the server was down if I calculate correctly, usually that'd be enough to do some more hashing which we can still do, but considering last game you should have a direction in mind

lot of good options, I'm good with the Lethal wagon personally, the acting to ward off any suspicion is just a bit too much, my vote will be staying where it is

Lethal · Mar 9, 2023

TAT said:
anyway it's important that Town converge and eventually agree with a wagon, we got about 18 hours including the time the server was down if I calculate correctly, usually that'd be enough to do some more hashing which we can still do, but considering last game you should have a direction in mind

lot of good options, I'm good with the Lethal wagon personally, the acting to ward off any suspicion is just a bit too much, my vote will be staying where it is

Flower · Mar 9, 2023

Lethal, start playing.

Ratchet · Mar 9, 2023

Flower said:
Semantics.

Uh, not at all? You asked me why it couldn't just be Ekko exploring multiple angles here - my specific issue with Ekko was that his post appeared to be doing so on a surface level, but in actuality, was not doing this at all. You don't get to just dismiss this as semantics - it would be much easier if you just admitted that you didn't fully read what I said instead of prolonging this argument with absolute tripe.

Flower said:
And Ekko also considers you could be Town in his posts. He just arrived at the conclusion that you‘re more likely scum than Town. Which is a fine conclusion to arrive at given your actions in the game so far don‘t exactly scream Town. If they‘re bad, why don‘t you prove him wrong with logic and by being proactive instead of being all that dismissive?

What exactly are you asking of me here? I don't have any reason to value what you consider is a "fine conclusion". It's not like my play is divorced of game-related content either. As you can see, I have attempted to go through them logically here, you clearly haven't read it (see the above paragraph).

Flower said:
And here you go again, being dismissive.

So that's a no, then. About what I expected.

Flower said:
Now, what are your reads so far and with reasons, please.

Later. Tweet/Ekko/Lethal - all fine with these lynches today. Have no specific read on Phenom currently, not objecting or supporting the lynch.

Lethal · Mar 9, 2023

Flower said:
Lethal, start playing.

People severely overestimate their expectations of my game.

4 people barking orders to start playing. I question the merits as to why I should START PLAYING. 900 posts to wade through. Fucking what?

Lethal · Mar 9, 2023

Driver Nephi, VT. Apparently he's some decent member of the fiends, a group from the Mojave.

Gonna be at least 30 mins before I finish the read through. Anything worthwhile posted by TAT cos I cba reading the absolute word vomit he's spammed? Ekko actually done anything?

TAT · Mar 9, 2023

Lethal said:
People severely overestimate their expectations of my game.

4 people barking orders to start playing. I question the merits as to why I should START PLAYING. 900 posts to wade through. Fucking what?

Change it to 60 posts per page, it's not as bad that way

Lethal · Mar 9, 2023

Ratchet said:
Later. Tweet/Ekko/Lethal - all fine with these lynches today. Have no specific read on Phenom currently, not objecting or supporting the lynch.

Oh look, spouting names but no attachment to anything. Weak. Just like Eastenders.

Lethal · Mar 9, 2023

TAT said:
Change it to 60 posts per page, it's not as bad that way

Game Ranked Fallout New Vegas Mafia

Luminous

Luminous

T.B.A

T.B.A

Luminous

Preeminent

Luminous

Devil Bitch

T.B.A

T.B.A

Preeminent

Preeminent

T.B.A

Devil Bitch

Luminous

T.B.A

T.B.A

Preeminent

T.B.A

T.B.A

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency