It would help to read the full post, before responding:Why can‘t it be Town Ekko genuinely trying to analyze different angles?
Emphasis mine.because on an initial skim it comes across as hin having explored multiple angles to this and came to the conclusion that a scum one fits the best. In reality, it's all the same angle, just extrapolated three different ways.
I'm not really - I've never advertised my vote as more than a policy lynch, which means I can at the very least accept that there is a false positive at work here. Moreover, I was asked why I felt it nonsense - the purpose of that post was to establish this. My objection with Ekko is that he has presented his arguments as if there are only one of a set number of scenarios at play - all bad for me. I have not done this.You see, you accuse him of shading you and that he already came to the conclusion you‘re scum, but here you are doing the same thing. You‘re not trying to see it from a Town Ekko pov.
Is your opinion supposed to hold any value to me? I don't need to be in a heated argument to be dismissive of Ekko here.Your posts feel like a glorified excuse not to interact with him in the game. I can see this from a Town you perspective as well given your history, but so far nothing warrants this kind of reaction since it‘s not even a heated argument yet.
Instead of this, have you got anything useful to say about the rest of my post, or can I just proceed to ignore further interactions with you on this now and skip the boring bits?If you‘re Town, what are you even doing?