• We're looking for artists. Direct message Dr. Watson for more info!

Game Ranked Fallout New Vegas Mafia

Status
Not open for further replies.
Why can‘t it be Town Ekko genuinely trying to analyze different angles?
It would help to read the full post, before responding:
because on an initial skim it comes across as hin having explored multiple angles to this and came to the conclusion that a scum one fits the best. In reality, it's all the same angle, just extrapolated three different ways.
Emphasis mine.
You see, you accuse him of shading you and that he already came to the conclusion you‘re scum, but here you are doing the same thing. You‘re not trying to see it from a Town Ekko pov.
I'm not really - I've never advertised my vote as more than a policy lynch, which means I can at the very least accept that there is a false positive at work here. Moreover, I was asked why I felt it nonsense - the purpose of that post was to establish this. My objection with Ekko is that he has presented his arguments as if there are only one of a set number of scenarios at play - all bad for me. I have not done this.
Your posts feel like a glorified excuse not to interact with him in the game. I can see this from a Town you perspective as well given your history, but so far nothing warrants this kind of reaction since it‘s not even a heated argument yet.
Is your opinion supposed to hold any value to me? I don't need to be in a heated argument to be dismissive of Ekko here.
If you‘re Town, what are you even doing?
Instead of this, have you got anything useful to say about the rest of my post, or can I just proceed to ignore further interactions with you on this now and skip the boring bits?
 
I don't think Ekko has been that bad tbh
This can probably go too - has absolutely nothing useful to say but sideline commentary like this.

Is there a reason why all of you have just ignored the actual meat of the posts I've made this morning, specifically around Tweet, and instead opted to focus on this? Regardless of what you think, I've outlined why I think what I think, so if you're so interested in this, that should be what's addressed.
 
Oh you can fall asleep sure, what a mighty talented guy you must be to react to Odo's post while asleep, then slink away for 18-24 hours...



Sounds like a bit of fake anger, classic defence mechanism for scum tbh

unvote vote lynch Lethal
Um I woke up for that you dumb ****. Try some logic once in your life.

Stupid reason to justify a vote. Classic mechanism for clueless twat with nothing else to go off.
 
This can probably go too - has absolutely nothing useful to say but sideline commentary like this.

Is there a reason why all of you have just ignored the actual meat of the posts I've made this morning, specifically around Tweet, and instead opted to focus on this? Regardless of what you think, I've outlined why I think what I think, so if you're so interested in this, that should be what's addressed.
Cos he's an opportunistic little piss ant who is incapable of original thought
 
This can probably go too - has absolutely nothing useful to say but sideline commentary like this.

Is there a reason why all of you have just ignored the actual meat of the posts I've made this morning, specifically around Tweet, and instead opted to focus on this? Regardless of what you think, I've outlined why I think what I think, so if you're so interested in this, that should be what's addressed.

You're making a bunch of posts, I don't agree with them, simple

Um I woke up for that you dumb ****. Try some logic once in your life.

Stupid reason to justify a vote. Classic mechanism for clueless twat with nothing else to go off.

You're absolutely rattled

You got nothing to you, just a wannabe me from back in the day
:hestonpls
 
Emphasis mine.
Semantics.
I'm not really - I've never advertised my vote as more than a policy lynch, which means I can at the very least accept that there is a false positive at work here. Moreover, I was asked why I felt it nonsense - the purpose of that post was to establish this. My objection with Ekko is that he has presented his arguments as if there are only one of a set number of scenarios at play - all bad for me. I have not done this.
And Ekko also considers you could be Town in his posts. He just arrived at the conclusion that you‘re more likely scum than Town. Which is a fine conclusion to arrive at given your actions in the game so far don‘t exactly scream Town. If they‘re bad, why don‘t you prove him wrong with logic and by being proactive instead of being all that dismissive?
Instead of this, have you got anything useful to say about the rest of my post, or can I just proceed to ignore further interactions with you on this now and skip the boring bits?
And here you go again, being dismissive.

Now, what are your reads so far and with reasons, please.
 
anyway it's important that Town converge and eventually agree with a wagon, we got about 18 hours including the time the server was down if I calculate correctly, usually that'd be enough to do some more hashing which we can still do, but considering last game you should have a direction in mind

lot of good options, I'm good with the Lethal wagon personally, the acting to ward off any suspicion is just a bit too much, my vote will be staying where it is
 
anyway it's important that Town converge and eventually agree with a wagon, we got about 18 hours including the time the server was down if I calculate correctly, usually that'd be enough to do some more hashing which we can still do, but considering last game you should have a direction in mind

lot of good options, I'm good with the Lethal wagon personally, the acting to ward off any suspicion is just a bit too much, my vote will be staying where it is
:hestonpls
 
Semantics.
Uh, not at all? You asked me why it couldn't just be Ekko exploring multiple angles here - my specific issue with Ekko was that his post appeared to be doing so on a surface level, but in actuality, was not doing this at all. You don't get to just dismiss this as semantics - it would be much easier if you just admitted that you didn't fully read what I said instead of prolonging this argument with absolute tripe.
And Ekko also considers you could be Town in his posts. He just arrived at the conclusion that you‘re more likely scum than Town. Which is a fine conclusion to arrive at given your actions in the game so far don‘t exactly scream Town. If they‘re bad, why don‘t you prove him wrong with logic and by being proactive instead of being all that dismissive?
What exactly are you asking of me here? I don't have any reason to value what you consider is a "fine conclusion". It's not like my play is divorced of game-related content either. As you can see, I have attempted to go through them logically here, you clearly haven't read it (see the above paragraph).
And here you go again, being dismissive.
So that's a no, then. About what I expected.
Now, what are your reads so far and with reasons, please.
Later. Tweet/Ekko/Lethal - all fine with these lynches today. Have no specific read on Phenom currently, not objecting or supporting the lynch.
 
Lethal, start playing.
:HaydenP:

People severely overestimate their expectations of my game.

4 people barking orders to start playing. I question the merits as to why I should START PLAYING. 900 posts to wade through. Fucking what?
 
Driver Nephi, VT. Apparently he's some decent member of the fiends, a group from the Mojave.

Gonna be at least 30 mins before I finish the read through. Anything worthwhile posted by TAT cos I cba reading the absolute word vomit he's spammed? Ekko actually done anything?
 
:HaydenP:

People severely overestimate their expectations of my game.

4 people barking orders to start playing. I question the merits as to why I should START PLAYING. 900 posts to wade through. Fucking what?

Change it to 60 posts per page, it's not as bad that way
 
Later. Tweet/Ekko/Lethal - all fine with these lynches today. Have no specific read on Phenom currently, not objecting or supporting the lynch.
Oh look, spouting names but no attachment to anything. Weak. Just like Eastenders.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top