- Status
Yeah, I mean I think I evidenced it well enough last day phase to be honest. Ignore him and he will tunnel away all day, with his royal use of we particularly aggravating, answer him and he will literally change the point of the discussion to something tangible related to a word used, and then when you point this out, double down on it before insisting it's a useless discussion to have that adds nothing (and that's obviously your fault, not his).
Annoying to play with, annoying to host for.
Psychic
Yennefer
I have a strong townread on Ekko so I followed him. Also I agreed with his PoE list.
I suppose my response would be -
1 - I think T Pein is still a good direction, and I don't really think you can dismiss the case building out of hand when there were two good lynches on the table. I actually maintain that Lethal was a good lynch - I don't want to rag on someone who can't respond, but his reaction to pressure was poor and he didn't seem at all invested in the game.
2 - How likely do you think it is that Gram hints towards a role that easily confirms himself and isn't able to back it up? I mean, he surely understands that he would need to do so, at some stage, my reaction personally is to assume he will come good on it, and ask he proves himself before we get to say Day 4. It just doesn't strike me as a viable thought here that you believe there would be any chance he wouldn't do so - unless he is playing to be bussed I suppose. It obviously isn't that important now, but I am struggling to see the logic behind your thought process.
That doesn't answer my question. A town read on Ekko shouldn't influence your read on me given that you know first hand he doesn't have a good track record of reading me correctly, and it was also a read he had from day 1 - the phase he is most likely to be incorrect on. I'm pretty sure you mentioned a town read on me last day at some point, too, but I'll have to verify that.
In other words, you are going to have to demonstrate why you agree with his PoE. From my position it's pretty terrible.
Yeah this is just nonsense. If he were the scum team then how did Soul die? You could say the Serial killer maybe but then you'd have no reason to assume it came from a team. Time you full claimed.
Ekko's defence of Psychic yesterday was very undue by the way. Probably a good Vig shot.
At best, and I mean very charitably, this is simping/white knighting on such an egregious level I would argue that it compromises integrity. Where does any of this come from? Why would you protect someone who only flavour claimed? Without needing to, at that.
Psychic
Yennefer
Look, I was busy yesterday. I can't be asked to read "Ekko vs Ratchet" round 2005 post per post. I don't have a good read on you but I do have a good read on Ekko. He seems town this game and I'm willing to trust him since he knows your gameplay more than anyone.
I already said he was dumb town vig though it's pretty stupid to out himself this early. Then again, the attempt kill on me was stupid as well. I think we need to focus on real scum here.
RDK
Marvelous
PHEN0M
GOATN0M
It's an unenviable task honestly. I'll be transparent - if at any point in the game I get wagonned due to Ekko spamming the thread with the points he has been making so far, good chance Injust don't bother to defend it beyond what I've done already. It's bad enough having one Ekko to deal with, the people enabling him are almost as bad to me.
Hans Tweetenberg
Exceptional
Gonna say RDK is likely town
Can't say I very much enjoy reading this game rn
Can't say I very much enjoy reading this game rn
PHEN0M
GOATN0M
Now now, no need for name calling. I’m sorry I caught you this early. Full claim please and thank you.
Your wording on this throws me off - yesterday you had me as slight town, today you are just not quite convinced I'm scum - the latter implies you're leaning in that direction.
This is the problem I have with a lot of you actually. You let Ekko repeat his nonsense over and over, unchallenged, and enable it, and when I do address it, it gets dismissed as the two of them just arguing. I've addressed every point he has made, and from my point of view I consider his argument debunked. Why do I have to tolerate the threat of a wagon in the near future because you'd rather just follow the spammer instead of reasoning it out yourself? It's so frustrating.
"knows my gameplay more than anyone here"? Have you got any evidence for this? I've played Mafia with Soul for a decade. I've played with X for about 5 years now, very consistently over that period of time. To say nothing of his poor accuracy (I can verify this with a host of examples). I don't care how busy you are, you're propping up your arguments with utter nonsense - I'm not going to let that slide. If I'm to read between the lines here, you two would have to have mech info clearing each other to justify this level of defence from Ekko onto you, and your inexplicable level of trust in his reads. If this is the case, you need to claim it *ASAP*, and either way, you need to full claim - your role that is, I don't care about your character.
Okay, like who? I'm on board with T-Pein (I don't know why you attribute that to Ekko by the way, he latched onto it yesterday after he was a consensus scum read, and his points were some nonsense about colours rather than the actual reasons to scum read Pein).
Day 2 Vote Count #1
Since T-Pein is also on my list....would rather see a T-Pein flip before ratchet.
[Change vote lynch T-Pein]
Ekko: Ratchet
Psychic: Ratchet > T-Pein
Phenom: Psychic
Gram: T-Pein > Psychic
RDK: T-Pein > Psychic
Chadwick: Psychic
BPD: T-Pein
Vote count:
Psychic: 4
T-Pein: 2
Ratchet: 1
With 19 players remaining, it takes 10 votes to reach majority
- Status