It's weird you feel the need to insert yourself and be weirdly passive aggressive over people discussing mafia in the mafia general
You've used this thread almost exclusively for shitposting, what are you getting your nuts twisted about exactly
Lmao
Trying to tell adults to act like adults is weird now
Think this is right. Subbing back dead players is something I considered this game but it would be problematic ranking wise. What do you do when a player is town, dies, but then subs in as scum? Imagine scum win in this situation, do you give them points for winning as scum or none because they lost as town? Also annoying with awards in the mix too. What if both your town and scum play were the best of the best (hypothetically). It would just confuse stuffResubbing Dead players is a failure of resource management in a game environment where we're tracking ranked statistics and stuff should be avoided when possible. Just means you should run smaller games to begin with if you're having to resort to that. You also don't wanna become like WG where it starts becoming a meta level expectation and someone like Flower dies and is just like "whatever I'll sub back in anyway". It's obnoxious as fuck.
Think this is right. Subbing back dead players is something I considered this game but it would be problematic ranking wise. What do you do when a player is town, dies, but then subs in as scum? Imagine scum win in this situation, do you give them points for winning as scum or none because they lost as town? Also annoying with awards in the mix too. What if both your town and scum play were the best of the best (hypothetically). It would just confuse stuff
I just don't think stuff like this drama should be publicIt's weird you feel the need to insert yourself and be weirdly passive aggressive over people discussing shit
You've used this thread almost exclusively for shitposting, what are you getting your nuts twisted about exactly
Fineee I'll get to itSpeaking of awards...
Who said it was weird.Lmao
Trying to tell adults to act like adults is weird now
Im MVP of courseFineee I'll get to it
I just don't think stuff like this drama should be public
Especially if people can go too far when angry
Like imagine if people started calling each others mothers whores because things were allowed to escalate
Fuji told me there was dramaDidn't expect to see you back here, Flower
Also I see, heard about that game from her since she said she was upset about being shot Day 1, but didn't know she resorted to rule-breaking right after. Probably wouldn't have let her play if I knew that.
By the looks of it, it happened only 1 week ago too... ._.
What happenedFuji told me there was drama. I think I wanna play the next game. Now that I‘m keeping my job things might finally calm down in my life again. Been a rough year all around .
I won‘t tell you and most others here. Maybe in a few years I‘ll have the strength to talk about it, but not now.What happened
They get win/loss credit for their most recent alignment. That's how it's always worked. It's not like this is a new concept lolThink this is right. Subbing back dead players is something I considered this game but it would be problematic ranking wise. What do you do when a player is town, dies, but then subs in as scum? Imagine scum win in this situation, do you give them points for winning as scum or none because they lost as town? Also annoying with awards in the mix too. What if both your town and scum play were the best of the best (hypothetically). It would just confuse stuff
Because it's a tired subject, she got banned immedietely and has left the forum as far as I can tell. I've also condemned what she did, it sucked, why can't I agree that inactivity is making these games fairly unplayable for large periods?What I want is for people who were not at all involved nor know the full extent of the situation to stop acting all holier than thou. It's annoying especially coming from my friend who basically avoided my game like the plague.
You've said worse things to people before for less yet it's somehow morally wrong for me and my partner to call someone who purposefully tried to ruin my game (not only for me as the host but for other players who put in their time and energy into it) a bitch?
If you have issues with inactivity in the section or whatever that's fine, just don't want someone criticizing word usage when I'm a pretty inexperienced host who just had my game intentionally ruined
Yeah it should be situational which is what I meant by under certain circumstances.I think subbing dead players back in is largely fine. You've just got to be a bit sensitive with it. I personally wouldn't sub back in a dead player that mafia have killed unless they give the ok, or that the sk kill unless they give the ok (if still alive). I'd also maybe not sub somebody in if mafia have extended great effort to get them lynched or somebody that is super pissed off about being lynched. Basically you don't want to negatively effect the game through subs. But if people get vigged/lynched then I think its generally alright
What do you mean "that's how it's always worked"? I've never seen it before on hereThey get win/loss credit for their most recent alignment. That's how it's always worked. It's not like this is a new concept lol
They get win/loss credit for their most recent alignment. That's how it's always worked. It's not like this is a new concept lol
Agreed on smaller gamesIt's doable but it's very corny imo. Sub ins are a staple for necessity and same player subs should be a last resort. Might as well just run smaller games instead of replacing canon fodder with the same jerkoffs, makes the stakes better that way
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?