Yeah the MCU parts were the weakest part of the movie.i don't count sm no way home as part of the mcu quality
cuz literally lads from non mcu verse, carried that movie = andrew and tobey
not to mention
thanks to them, mcu gained that success, from the whole activity of the past years
thanks to them, mcu gained that success, from the whole activity of the past years
The bold is sonyverse though.And then, they squandered that success immediately as I knew they would with fucking Morbius and now Love and Thunder.
Oh yeah Thor 1 definitely has a better story than Ragnarok, the latter just has a lot more going on and is more entertaining.I don’t believe Ragnarok is a better story than Thor 1, tbh
i may find it more entertaining at times, but Thor is a solid story that built up alot of the relationships Ragnarok depends on
Ragnarok’s best moments are things that were built up since the first movie, but its worst ones are its own additions
I still haven't watched No Way Home yet but I get what you mean.Think of it like this
No Way Home’s best moments are similar because all the good parts are thanks to other movies building a good foundation, while the worst parts is the shit that the movie itself added
I always thought Thor was cool but because he seemed cool in Avengersragnarok was the only thing that got me to care about thor at all
thor 1 and 2 were fucking ass
I get why people really invested in Thor might not have liked it but it made a character that never appealed to me enjoyable in some way
Not stoked for them deciding to adapt Jane Thor for Thor 4 (why did they keep the cancer plotline??????) but at least we got christian bale
Neither of those were franchise killingNot franchise-killing levels of awful like BvS or Justice League.