Does this extend to accusing players of impropriety, or cheating? Like, say, insisting they're in cliques designed to undermine games?
Does this extend to accusing players of impropriety, or cheating? Like, say, insisting they're in cliques designed to undermine games?Just an fyi if people are going to blame the host, even partially
Haza worked hard on this game - be respectful
oh the role was supposed to modkill?LMAO.
Had you actually gotten modkilled as you should have we'd have easily won kek.
We had this game solved.
Ik. I'm not gonna bully him into a win like the scum team did xD.Just an fyi if people are going to blame the host, even partially
Haza worked hard on this game - be respectful
No the punishment was losing vote power. Her point is that you doing in intentionally should have been a modkill. To be fair I think the move was pretty lame because it was intentional, could have done without it, but ultimately all it did was hurt us so to insist that's why the game was won is er, not true.oh the role was supposed to modkill?
what a terrible design then ffs. its unlimited shots
Where did we do this?I'm not gonna bully him into a win like the scum team did xD.
No, but you using the angle should always have been a modkill. It's one thing to forget. Deliberately playing for it is a fucking modkill. It's the same shit you pulled in WoT, disgusting.oh the role was supposed to modkill?
what a terrible design then ffs. its unlimited shots
oh nvm shes just coping thenNo the punishment was losing vote power. Her point is that you doing in intentionally should have been a modkill. To be fair I think the move was pretty lame because it was intentional, could have done without it, but ultimately all it did was hurt us so to insist that's why the game was won is er, not true.
Where did we do this?
There were arguments against the sk being the sk. There was way too much stupid play to sort through. It is easy to say from a scum pov that I should recognize which is town and which isn't.@Magic i think u struggle with handling stupid play. ur too lenient on it
u correctly cased me multiple times for doing stupid shit around nibel and poyser lynches and stuff but it never transitioned to a lynch
Good arguments tbh nglThere were arguments against the sk being the sk. There was way too much stupid play to sort through. It is easy to say from a scum pov that I should recognize which is town and which isn't.
how so? no rule says u cant do that. ive seen lots of PRs that kill players and the user can try to make the target break the PR to get the kill to go off. its within the rules of the game.Uh no? That just wouldn't be sporting
Here's something constructive to considerThen don't let yourself get coerced into that shit. Town itself had a lot of issues this game. It's not truth telling, it's just an Indie claim. I promised not to truth tell anymore. If they expose themselves by getting thrown off guard by me claiming Indie it's not my fucking fault and not yours kek.
I easily had like a 95% accuracy this game. I even cleared PoE fodder like Gad and Polar via logic lol.Here's something constructive to consider
In theory it's a valid tactic (imho) — it's just that it's misused frequently (...T-P)
In practice, the way you play it is important to avoid throwing and causing further conflict of people's reads of you. It ended up being detrimental to town.
If you want to play this way, I'd say your next approach is just scumhunting & townhunting like you would as an indie. It creates an air of suspicion without just stating arbitrary shit through trolling - I get bait reactions, but it's a negative because it induces further paranoia.
Get into that indie mindset to keep scum on their toes, but don't lean into your indie meta so much you risk getting lynched. Things you don't say out loud.
You may have a higher success rate if you ever do use it as a tactic since you've now proven you can have on the nose reads in hindsight now! Fuck yeah
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?