RDK
Resplendent
Okay that doesn't do a whole lot for me really but I'll take it into consideration
- It's that time of the year again! Just kidding, we were late.
Click here to see the awards and nominate people for the rest of the categories.
- We're looking for artists. Direct message Dr. Watson for more info!
- Status
Mmhm. Finally coming around to the Luka world!
Don't let ral hear you say this
Really funny theory is that Hime and Sky are SvS.
Btw to multiquote, just keep hitting +Quote and then proceed to the WYSIWYG box (the box you type in)
Click "insert quotes"
Click "insert quotes"
I love this forum UI in nearly every other way! I just don't like that ISO's are really bad for quoting.
Yup! You just can't do this while ISOing.
....where did I imply it was indicative of anything at all?
RDK
Resplendent
Do you think Hime would have agreed to thunderdome them in that scenario?
Hans Tweetenberg
Marvelous
Oh that one. Yeah I think you misunderstand, that post isn't to say that I'd hate it if CP got got, it's to say that if Magic is right on Fang and CP, that'd mean I'd have to admit I've been wrong on just about every read so far, and that's the part that would suck. I didn't mean to suggest that shooting CP was a bad idea.
hime
Exceptional
its not remotely related to self meta?
he said that scum started bussing cp after evans said to shoot magic or cp
for rdk to believe i am scum, he would have to acknowledge that the bussing would have had to start in dp1
Mmm
Show me, send me a visitor message on my profile
There seems to be a common theme of people thinking that self meta is indicative of an evil. They're wrong!
Oh. I see now. To me it implied you wanted to rather shoot Magic than CP.
Understood!
hime
Exceptional
this is a duel not a lynch
u would need the format "Vote [player] to win" for it to count
RDK
Resplendent
yeah it's not really self meta at all, dunno why she said that
and I also think there is a clear difference between saying someones post looked weak and asking for someone to be shot. It's not like you had built up a substantial push on CP at all. Your only firm push in that direction came AFTER Evans post. This is what I'm communicating.
Thanks <3
Vote Win Sky
You're essentially using a scenario (for me to do X I'd have to do Y) to prove something, which is self-meta
I can pull up ten quotes of mine after you ask me "but doesn't that mean ur actually a dog person?" and selectively quote myself over how cats are better than dogs
How convincing would that be to you for me to drag out an example when it'd rely entirely on my perspective and how I perceived my own actions?
That's what I'm getting at, it doesn't really provide anything than your own perspective because it isn't disprovable per se
If that makes sense
- Status