MotherFcker Ultimate
Illustrious
how do you treat feats and statements that would be considered higher D? do you consider them unquantifiable and ignore them? do you equate them to your tiering system?
can i do that or do i need a mod to do itAlso, just realized this should be moved to Meta-Battledome
Every tier list is flawed in some way but alot of dimensional tiering obfuscates a person’s actual power output.how do you treat feats and statements that would be considered higher D? do you consider them unquantifiable and ignore them? do you equate them to your tiering system?
it is not even consistent within the same series most of the time letalone trying to use it as a standard for all of themWe don't do dimensional scaling or tiering at all here. This stuff is even more nuanced, annoying to standardize, and quantify then the issues of dealing with timelines or the cosmology of multiple universes and parallel worlds. I know VSB has a hard on for this kind of stuff but in general its so superflous, with little to no substance, and makes zero direct impact with destructive capacity/energetic output we don't bother with it.
For example, a 4-D sphere that is 1 meter in radius will have a volume of 4.935 cubic meters instead of 4.189 cubic meters. Slightly bigger.
The numbers your calculator spit out are in m^11 not m^3 (/ in m^10 not m^2). Just sayin'.For example the observable universe is in 3 dimensional space, is 46.6 billion light years, and a surface area of 2.723e22 square light years . According to string theory there are 7 other dimensions folded to planck levels such that they are irrelevant*. Let's suppose the universe is uncompactified and these 7 other dimensions extended as far out as the 3 main ones. Our observable universe would have a volume of 1.23e107 cubic light years or 2.643e97 square light years.
The problem is there's dozens of verses in fiction above infinite universalEverything above infinite power is subjective baloney and shouldn't exist.
The numbers your calculator spit out are in m^11 not m^3 (/ in m^10 not m^2). Just sayin'.
Abandon standardized systems, return to direct comparison.The problem is there's dozens of verses in fiction above infinite universal
You need to quantify superiority somehow
Higher infinities exist and can be gauged, dimensionality just isn't the way
Literally explained there is a multiverse, like you can claim it isn't above multiversal, but there is clear constant evidence of multiversal tiering. Parallel universes are a clearly established idea in Twin Peaks. You're just splitting hairs in such a way that a shitton of verses wouldn't count as multiversal as a result.No amount of dimensional tiering will make twin peaks multiversal, fyi.