Because that's referring to him being able to react to her own attacks in time.Someone’s not reading
^ Needed to develop a surefire move just for stopping Gungnir to be able to stop it
Touma needed no such thing against any of the Calamities and wasn’t breaking fingers nulling them or their attacks
Try again, clown
Even with a special power in his right hand, he would be smashed to pieces before he could use it.
No one would have been able to keep up with its overwhelming speed. Their bodies would have been smashed to pieces before they could even hope to follow the tip of the lance with their eyes.
But the experience he had built up accurately guided his movements.
He had achieved a surefire attack that would work on Magic God Othinus and no one else.
And we know Imagine Breaker’s powers become more effective the further removed from reality the opponent is like a straight up reality warper like Othinus and even then it took countless lifetimes worth of experienceBecause that's referring to him being able to react to her own attacks in time.
The thing repeatedly emphasized throughout the volume that he can only do because of his "experience" (which isn't how experience in combat works but I digress).
"Even with a special power in his right hand, he would be smashed to pieces before he could use it."
That quote specifically says that the issue is not being able to negate it, but being able to react in time.
Genuinely what are you talking about?
You're misinterpreting what that means then.And we know Imagine Breaker’s powers become more effective the further removed from reality the opponent is like a straight up reality warper like Othinus and even then it took countless lifetimes worth of experience
Since Touma went from not being able to do anything to just her passive reality warping and even IT being crushed by her to stopping her most power attack with effort
No, it literally says it’s power to negate shines greater the more further removed the opponent isYou're misinterpreting what that means then.
It's not a literal buff in terms of its "negation potency". Imagine Breaker is effective on stuff that is supernatural and isn't effective on things that aren't.
Those aren't the actual beings.No, it literally says it’s power to negate shines greater the more further removed the opponent is
Archangels get used as literal cannon fodder between Crowley and Mathers
Yet Crowley can’t beat even a nerfed Magic God without help
Gabriel was so beneath Aiwass, Accelerator couldn’t even begin to compare between the two, same Aiwass that got folded by Coronzon who in turn is stated twice that her ultimate spell rivals Othinus that you deliberately ignore.
Muh Phase beings don’t mean shit
Do I need to make another Magic God character like Othinus vs X character your wanking to give you a second reminder of how hard your scaling for this series blows ass?
I’d rather that over you continuing to piss on this Discussion thread yet again with your garbage takes on this series
There’s never a distinction made to know how much stronger they wereThose aren't the actual beings.
That wasn't the actual Gabriel.
Already debunked this. Try not spinning this lie againAiwass nor Coronzon were utilizing their full power in the surface world.
And your a bullshit artistEtc.
You don't seem to pay attention.
There is, you just haven't paid attention. But god forbid anything go against your idea of Magic Gods being ineffable, untouchable beings.There’s never a distinction made to know how much stronger they were
Already debunked this. Try not spinning this lie again
And your a bullshit artist
No patience is going to be wasted debating a clown who insists on repeating the same song and dance every fucking chance they get while being the most annoying prick possible about itPlease step away from the computer for a while man. You're getting way too heated at this already.
Anyone know what volume this fromAfter all, if god and the angels
existed before humans were born, then the constructions and ceremonies created by
humans can’t possibly be absolutely necessary.”
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?