please bore someone else with this, duplicate roles are outside the scope of what’s acceptable in a game here, your opinion on this is 100% irrelevant.
Depending on the setup, duplicate vigs could pass on nearly every other forum so a bit weirded out by this. It all depends on ratios. I agree that they're generally town sided, but at the same time it can also just be fine. Theoretically speaking, it gives town extra KP and that's it. The only way it's really bad is if you do setup speculation which isn't in the spirit of the game, so focus on this seems a bit weird. IE:
16v3
Duplicate vigs.
12v3, 8v3, 4v3.
That's still, if you're accounting vigilante's as MLs 9 MLs town has. With 14 mislynchable townies in this setup who aren't PRs, 64%. It isn't an outlandish idea in a game w/ this many people, especially if scum has a bulletproof or two. So, this feels just. Bad.
Why are people trying to wagon Ratchet here at all? Idgi why would a scum CC a vig at EOD1, especailly a player as good as Ratchet.
I think second redirector is more plausible than "Ultra tanks a good claim to make a 1:1 trade". I have all the reason in the world to not place any faith in some of this setup spec too, namely because I know most of you are flat out wrong.Can you explain why you won't lynch ultra. Is your conclusion second redirector?
Because otherwise this is self serving.
What's your reads? You haven't given like. A single read. The entire day.You think Ekko was the scum kill?
please bore someone else with this, duplicate roles are outside the scope of what’s acceptable in a game here, your opinion on this is 100% irrelevant.
That's because your typical thought process is:I literally said this and got ganged up by scumbois.
sad.
No he means in a mafia team I'm not going to be the one making a kill. Especially if my fake is mason and I'm meant to have no actions.
Probably cause I don' think much has changed and what little I remember I put in my I give up postWhat's your reads? You haven't given like. A single read. The entire day.
What's with your name / pfp?Anything happen while I was gone
I’m definitely going Sigi first between the two with the addition of hairgate (and if Sigi is town then Ichigo as scum starts making less sense to me)Vote: Kurosaki Ichigo
Think this is where I want to go. I can't buy into the stated thought process - it tracks on a surface level but there is no good reason that Ichigo wouldn't have come in swinging, and certainly wouldn't have allowed us to waste time lynching Sig. He had already attached himself to Sig so this in whole feels like trying to get one more go out of a scum role. It would mean that Sig has to be Mafia and not SK, but with the kill being redirected I don't think that's been considered enough. On this basis I'm not against lynching Sig either.
think he means it's bad setup moreso than it didn't happen.
you gonna look HELLA silly when ratchet Kun flips vig.
Maybe read my posts?Why?
I think second redirector is more plausible than "Ultra tanks a good claim to make a 1:1 trade". I have all the reason in the world to not place any faith in some of this setup spec too, namely because I know most of you are flat out wrong.
I mean, yeah, that's why Ultra was pushing Magic. This is really bad post..
Shhhh, he has returned to his true selfWhat's with your name / pfp?
No but based on my claim and the lack of clear results it should have been a consideration in your mind and yet never was.Is your argument here is that I should defacto assume you'd never take any actions as scum? lmao
I'm okay with going for Sig. But I could see a world where Sig is SK and Ichigo is Mafia wanting the SK to thin numbers further, obviously this isn't my conclusion but there are holes here. I can't see a world where Ichigo isn't Mafia on this basis though, and I want to lynch the best bet.If your ascribed motive is that he's defending sig why not go for sig first
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?