And what about it don't you like?Do not like the Mel wagon here
0/10
The why is pretty evident - you're misrepresenting what is being said. You've been conflating buddying and pocketing, too. The thing I said Mango wasn't doing was specific, but the overall idea is not, because I'm familiar with both players. For the third time, Mango wasn't applying specific meta against Melkor, he was pointing out what he felt was an example of something I mentioned he wasn't doing, which I agree with btw. This is after you go out of your way to make sure you established why he shouldn't town read me, for absolutely no reason because nothing he said even implied a town read. Think you were trying to land a gotcha here.mango asked about meta when i brought it up to him because what you described to him was your meta of him. i explicitly said that same meta isn't just applicable to melkor, which is precisely what he was stating when he said it looked like the buddying you were describing.
right and i agree except the buddying thing you stated mango wasn't doing IS NOT A GENERAL BUDDYING TELL. it is specific to mango. if you still struggle with this it's an issue of reading comprehension.
why is that?
O.OI am very busy
Page one tells me a story giving me the chills, so
Vote lynch Luka
That's a Ruffles wagon thoDo not like the Mel wagon here
0/10
So, can I have your thoughts on Melkor and Ratchet?remember when you talked to yourself and you said you were generating content.
this is generating content. open ended discussion!
I'm not up in arms about your accusation, I'm saying that your point isn't tracking. This is yet again misrepresentation of the discussion. It's not about defending Mango, it's attacking you.we're back to square 1 of what i said about what appeared to be more likely to be buddying lol.
i was never accusing you yet he's up in arms over it. you think he's defending you when you were never being sussed.
you asked about meta when you asked me how what was said had any connection to meta.Wait sorry, what?
When did I ask about META? I asked about how what was said had any connection to META.
You're losing me man, it was quite simple, Melkor's post would appear more to be "buddying", it was a post that was an example of how LM post came across versus what I was doing.
A comparison if you will.
how am i misrepresenting the discussion when he felt you were being his lawyer? he felt he was being defended.I'm not up in arms about your accusation, I'm saying that your point isn't tracking. This is yet again misrepresentation of the discussion. It's not about defending Mango, it's attacking you.
Vote: Magic
????I just got mischopped in a turbo game
What haven't you liked about me? You'll get top 3 GTH reads later, given I only have 3 reads right now.
That is not an accusation by the way, it was not a comment made to implicate LM if that is an angle you want to take.You're losing me man, it was quite simple, Melkor's post would appear more to be "buddying", it was a post that was an example of how LM post came across versus what I was doing.
A comparison if you will.
I actually don't find his development to be particularly scummy in nature, he is definitely nitpicking on your angle and is trying to clear up any misunderstandings - I don't think scum would go out of their way to clear misunderstandings like this which could easily be grounds for a case down the line.we're back to square 1 of what i said about what appeared to be more likely to be buddying lol.
i was never accusing you yet he's up in arms over it. you think he's defending you when you were never being sussed.
Like, you seem to not like Ratchet here but you're not directly calling them scum or voting them.
You said I was "up in arms" because I questioned what your point even was, attributing my actions to defence instead of what they were - questioning you. Has nothing to do with what Mango was saying at all.how am i misrepresenting the discussion when he felt you were being his lawyer? he felt he was being defended.
you're not this thick, ratchet.
So, do you think Ratchet is a wolf?you're not this thick, ratchet.
What's not to understand about this?????
This is absolute LHF triteMelkors first post was 100%, undeniably bad. He's assuming that people are going to be busing just from the numbers, which is just. not how busing / the game works in general.
Didn't you instantly vote somebody else though?there's no reason to be rash!
which misunderstandings do you think could easily be grounds for a case down the line? youre not as familiar to me as ratchet is. im not one to be unclear of my stances/reads on players. if i dont think youre scum no one is going to go back and pick up some obsecure thing to state that i thought you were somehow being scummy.That is not an accusation by the way, it was not a comment made to implicate LM if that is an angle you want to take.
I actually don't find his development to be particularly scummy in nature, he is definitely nitpicking on your angle and is trying to clear up any misunderstandings - I don't think scum would go out of their way to clear misunderstandings like this which could easily be grounds for a case down the line.
IDC if Melkor is LHF, LHF can be wolves too. They are wolfy. That is the end of the story, unless you have a reason to be against my accusation don't bother fighting me on this.This is absolute LHF trite
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?