• We're looking for artists. Direct message Dr. Watson for more info!

Game Vampire The Masquerade: Bloodlines

Vote: Cata
I am not in favour of lynching the Masons, certainly not before Cata/Star. On the note of Star, Star was arguing that Ultra was very scummy (too scummy to be scum even) for the suggestion of lynching the Masons, but now happily wants to lynch one because they... survived a night?
 
That didn't take much convincing
At this point, I don't know what's going on with the masons, and whether its reverse psychology or not.

If Atsu flips town, then Lapp is confirmed town, so there's one less person to try and solve.

If Atsu flips scum, then Lapp is confirmed scum, and we can lynch them tomorrow and be in a good position again.
 
Vote: Cata
I am not in favour of lynching the Masons, certainly not before Cata/Star. On the note of Star, Star was arguing that Ultra was very scummy (too scummy to be scum even) for the suggestion of lynching the Masons, but now happily wants to lynch one because they... survived a night?
Look, at this point Ultra's starting to have a point about scum ignoring the masons, especially when they're getting pretty close to the endgame. If nothing else, one flip confirming two people isn't a bad tradeoff, and if they flip town we can start looking at Ultra and other people who pushed them early on.
 
Look, at this point Ultra's starting to have a point about scum ignoring the masons, especially when they're getting pretty close to the endgame. If nothing else, one flip confirming two people isn't a bad tradeoff, and if they flip town we can start looking at Ultra and other people who pushed them early on.
I'd be more inclined to look at the people who wanted to get that direction moving ahead without getting their hands dirty before I would be looking at Ultra there.
 
I'm gonna laugh when this backfires.

I still think lynching an inactive player who hasn't contributed anything other than voting last day is valid.
Do I have to point it out to you that the crux of the matter here is that you haven't responded to any of the criticisms against you but are instead trying to push us towards a lhf argument regarding inactives?

You're acting like your outing absolves Nipples and Lapp. It doesn't. But like the tit pointed out, if Nipples is, in your estimation, scum and a worthy lynch, why can't you find it in yourself to make a case against Lapp? They're either scum or town together, there's no other option. And yet you avoid Lapp like the plague.
 
Do I have to point it out to you that the crux of the matter here is that you haven't responded to any of the criticisms against you but are instead trying to push us towards a lhf argument regarding inactives?

You're acting like your outing absolves Nipples and Lapp. It doesn't. But like the tit pointed out, if Nipples is, in your estimation, scum and a worthy lynch, why can't you find it in yourself to make a case against Lapp? They're either scum or town together, there's no other option. And yet you avoid Lapp like the plague.
No argument I make is going to change your mind. I have given my role. Have stated what I've done and you still are trying to wagon me.

I think Lapp is suspicious sure. But I doubt my changing my vote is going to lead to a lynch on him.

But why not, since I'm probably getting lynched anyway.

Vote Lapp
 
Okay so has literally anything happened in the past 2 ig days? we're back on evens so we're gonna have to sleep again before endgame most likely, which is honestly pretty funny.
 
Back
Top