• We're looking for artists. Direct message Dr. Watson for more info!

Game Ranked Wildlife Mafia

completely missed the "soft town read on tempest" at the end kek

1 more q

if you think tweet is usually sitting in the background and collecting info on plays before he strikes, you say he's doing the opposite here and wants to take a firm stance. if you think he's playing against what he usually does, then why is he your strongest town read?
because i believe it comes down to wanting to take a leadership role rather than allowing posters he scum reads to slip through his grasp.

too lazy to go back and quote the past few games where he made it explicitly clear that he abhored that his reads on players weren't considered and he felt it was blindingly obvious they were scum. i noticed it's been a gradual change those games compared to this one so arguably that could be the one thing that might indicate he's scum. not sure if that makes a lick of sense, im tired

opposite play doesn't always mean scum - it could also be a differentiation in their usual town meta if that makes sense?

scum play for him would be a lack of solving ime. so generally speaking - separate from his own meta - i feel this is a town play. he's stepping up his game much like nibel

this is partially a vibe im getting, partially the consideration that he was serious when he stated he was going to tryhard. think he's kept his word

how familiar are you with tweet as scum? is there something off im missing?
 
Nah you can go, im relatively happy with tweet so far so its more of a comparing notes deal
Simply because those are all first page fluff phase posts. That is the post of someone who's been told to analyse the game and panicked and did the first thing they saw. Like, so blatantly it's approaching too-bad-to-be-scum territory
 
because i believe it comes down to wanting to take a leadership role rather than allowing posters he scum reads to slip through his grasp.

too lazy to go back and quote the past few games where he made it explicitly clear that he abhored that his reads on players weren't considered and he felt it was blindingly obvious they were scum. i noticed it's been a gradual change those games compared to this one so arguably that could be the one thing that might indicate he's scum. not sure if that makes a lick of sense, im tired

opposite play doesn't always mean scum - it could also be a differentiation in their usual town meta if that makes sense?

scum play for him would be a lack of solving ime. so generally speaking - separate from his own meta - i feel this is a town play. he's stepping up his game much like nibel

this is partially a vibe im getting, partially the consideration that he was serious when he stated he was going to tryhard. think he's kept his word

how familiar are you with tweet as scum? is there something off im missing?
no, i just wanted to try and see your logic behind it

fwiw this is a very town watson post
 
i was gonna call you out for bullshitting but realised ur probably on more posts per page than me lmao

and if you could review further then that would be good? you're supposed to be trying to solve the game, not appease me. kinda weird that you would just review a select amount because i asked you to and then stop
lethargy is my excuse
 
Im a bit unsure here. I just browsed through her last scum game


and there she seems to start off pretty fucking aggro actually, and it took me by surprise because i was kinda assuming she would start off meek lmao. I think she starts off fairly hot there, and she gets pretty aggressive when people give her shit as well so she doesnt really seem scared of taking on people being suspect of her when she's scum

but by the same token, the way she is solving and posting here doesnt seem anything like the way she was solving in her last town game either


whereby she was super care free and pretty direct with asking questions and engaging

so yeah idk i dont feel like i have anything on her any more but also doesnt feel right to me lmao
 
Why do you think thats forced, specifically?
We tell her we want her to give us something to work with, in response she goes back to the start of the game, picking out some more or less random posts and completely overanalyses the crap out of them. On top of that, as Poyser pointed out, the read on me she reached doesn't even make sense by her own metrics. Nothing about that post feels like natural solving, and everything about it looks like appeasement.
 
She also seems way different than she did in the grand theft auto game where she was town


all the other games between those two, she was a rep in so not really a fair comparison lol

but the chink in that is, both of the games ive just posted she basically had a gimmick entry into the thread. GTA she had a PR and then Bleach she was basically starting a banter wagon on gad for no reason

but she was really proactive with engaging and asking questions and giving her opinions in both
 
We tell her we want her to give us something to work with, in response she goes back to the start of the game, picking out some more or less random posts and completely overanalyses the crap out of them. On top of that, as Poyser pointed out, the read on me she reached doesn't even make sense by her own metrics. Nothing about that post feels like natural solving, and everything about it looks like appeasement.
What do you think of her explanation post to that?
 
first, before i go back, what does not make sense with what i am saying?

these are one of the problems i have playing these games - if i cannot effectively get my points across, it's very difficult to play on the same wavelength and make a more concise point that is properly understood. throwing out "she makes no sense" gives me nothing to work off of here. i need more than that
 
We tell her we want her to give us something to work with, in response she goes back to the start of the game, picking out some more or less random posts and completely overanalyses the crap out of them. On top of that, as Poyser pointed out, the read on me she reached doesn't even make sense by her own metrics. Nothing about that post feels like natural solving, and everything about it looks like appeasement.

Nah her point on you is fairly easy to follow imo, people sometimes fall into a trap of plotting the behaviour/alignment relationship on a single axis, which only reliably works with totally nooby players, or with players with such distinctive styles that they struggle to replicate

She didnt pick the posts at random, she went to the start of the game did she not?
 
because i believe it comes down to wanting to take a leadership role rather than allowing posters he scum reads to slip through his grasp.

too lazy to go back and quote the past few games where he made it explicitly clear that he abhored that his reads on players weren't considered and he felt it was blindingly obvious they were scum. i noticed it's been a gradual change those games compared to this one so arguably that could be the one thing that might indicate he's scum. not sure if that makes a lick of sense, im tired

opposite play doesn't always mean scum - it could also be a differentiation in their usual town meta if that makes sense?

scum play for him would be a lack of solving ime. so generally speaking - separate from his own meta - i feel this is a town play. he's stepping up his game much like nibel

this is partially a vibe im getting, partially the consideration that he was serious when he stated he was going to tryhard. think he's kept his word

how familiar are you with tweet as scum? is there something off im missing?
Hmmm well I'm kinda torn here

On one hand we still have the contradiction that my play doesn't match the town meta you laid out for me

On the other hand I have noticed that you've been very understanding of my issues particularly during the last game so you making a feel-based read like this doesn't come across as fake or unnatural

The problem is that you arriving at the conclusion that I'm town can easily be explained away by ykno, you being scum and having all the answers

Mmmmmmmmmm to buy or not to buy
 
Nah her point on you is fairly easy to follow imo, people sometimes fall into a trap of plotting the behaviour/alignment relationship on a single axis, which only reliably works with totally nooby players, or with players with such distinctive styles that they struggle to replicate

She didnt pick the posts at random, she went to the start of the game did she not?
Yeah she went to the start and picked a few posts from there
 
Nah her point on you is fairly easy to follow imo, people sometimes fall into a trap of plotting the behaviour/alignment relationship on a single axis, which only reliably works with totally nooby players, or with players with such distinctive styles that they struggle to replicate

She didnt pick the posts at random, she went to the start of the game did she not?
Could you explain the first paragraph in simpler terms please, I can't say I understand what you're trying to say
 
Back
Top