Sky
So unreliable.
I mean I could also offer an opinion why I think it's forced but I don't want to pre-empt the birdWhy do you think thats forced, specifically?
I mean I could also offer an opinion why I think it's forced but I don't want to pre-empt the birdWhy do you think thats forced, specifically?
I mean I could also offer an opinion why I think it's forced but I don't want to pre-empt the bird
because i believe it comes down to wanting to take a leadership role rather than allowing posters he scum reads to slip through his grasp.completely missed the "soft town read on tempest" at the end kek
1 more q
if you think tweet is usually sitting in the background and collecting info on plays before he strikes, you say he's doing the opposite here and wants to take a firm stance. if you think he's playing against what he usually does, then why is he your strongest town read?
Simply because those are all first page fluff phase posts. That is the post of someone who's been told to analyse the game and panicked and did the first thing they saw. Like, so blatantly it's approaching too-bad-to-be-scum territoryNah you can go, im relatively happy with tweet so far so its more of a comparing notes deal
no, i just wanted to try and see your logic behind itbecause i believe it comes down to wanting to take a leadership role rather than allowing posters he scum reads to slip through his grasp.
too lazy to go back and quote the past few games where he made it explicitly clear that he abhored that his reads on players weren't considered and he felt it was blindingly obvious they were scum. i noticed it's been a gradual change those games compared to this one so arguably that could be the one thing that might indicate he's scum. not sure if that makes a lick of sense, im tired
opposite play doesn't always mean scum - it could also be a differentiation in their usual town meta if that makes sense?
scum play for him would be a lack of solving ime. so generally speaking - separate from his own meta - i feel this is a town play. he's stepping up his game much like nibel
this is partially a vibe im getting, partially the consideration that he was serious when he stated he was going to tryhard. think he's kept his word
how familiar are you with tweet as scum? is there something off im missing?
lethargy is my excusei was gonna call you out for bullshitting but realised ur probably on more posts per page than me lmao
and if you could review further then that would be good? you're supposed to be trying to solve the game, not appease me. kinda weird that you would just review a select amount because i asked you to and then stop
Simply because those are all first page fluff phase posts. That is the post of someone who's been told to analyse the game and panicked and did the first thing they saw. Like, so blatantly it's approaching too-bad-to-be-scum territory
We tell her we want her to give us something to work with, in response she goes back to the start of the game, picking out some more or less random posts and completely overanalyses the crap out of them. On top of that, as Poyser pointed out, the read on me she reached doesn't even make sense by her own metrics. Nothing about that post feels like natural solving, and everything about it looks like appeasement.Why do you think thats forced, specifically?
Does that mean you think she's currently getting townier? Mind walking me through that?Well fwiw I'm kind of traveling in the opposite direction of you re: Watson
What do you think of her explanation post to that?We tell her we want her to give us something to work with, in response she goes back to the start of the game, picking out some more or less random posts and completely overanalyses the crap out of them. On top of that, as Poyser pointed out, the read on me she reached doesn't even make sense by her own metrics. Nothing about that post feels like natural solving, and everything about it looks like appeasement.
I'm not sure what this is meant to be asking? I've got no way of knowing with certainty how other people actHow would you see this if you knew with certainty that she didnt panic?
We tell her we want her to give us something to work with, in response she goes back to the start of the game, picking out some more or less random posts and completely overanalyses the crap out of them. On top of that, as Poyser pointed out, the read on me she reached doesn't even make sense by her own metrics. Nothing about that post feels like natural solving, and everything about it looks like appeasement.
Hmmm well I'm kinda torn herebecause i believe it comes down to wanting to take a leadership role rather than allowing posters he scum reads to slip through his grasp.
too lazy to go back and quote the past few games where he made it explicitly clear that he abhored that his reads on players weren't considered and he felt it was blindingly obvious they were scum. i noticed it's been a gradual change those games compared to this one so arguably that could be the one thing that might indicate he's scum. not sure if that makes a lick of sense, im tired
opposite play doesn't always mean scum - it could also be a differentiation in their usual town meta if that makes sense?
scum play for him would be a lack of solving ime. so generally speaking - separate from his own meta - i feel this is a town play. he's stepping up his game much like nibel
this is partially a vibe im getting, partially the consideration that he was serious when he stated he was going to tryhard. think he's kept his word
how familiar are you with tweet as scum? is there something off im missing?
Yeah she went to the start and picked a few posts from thereNah her point on you is fairly easy to follow imo, people sometimes fall into a trap of plotting the behaviour/alignment relationship on a single axis, which only reliably works with totally nooby players, or with players with such distinctive styles that they struggle to replicate
She didnt pick the posts at random, she went to the start of the game did she not?
Yeah she went to the start and picked a few posts from there
Could you explain the first paragraph in simpler terms please, I can't say I understand what you're trying to sayNah her point on you is fairly easy to follow imo, people sometimes fall into a trap of plotting the behaviour/alignment relationship on a single axis, which only reliably works with totally nooby players, or with players with such distinctive styles that they struggle to replicate
She didnt pick the posts at random, she went to the start of the game did she not?