Good choice tbh .Actually I was sheeping Flower
Good choice tbh .Actually I was sheeping Flower
Don't we have hime confirming that Prof used a preventative ability in Xadlin N1?That is Ratchet's claim in D3 for a result from N1. Analyze that for me X.
That actually doesn't have any bearing on whether or not Prof was busdriven - hime targeted Xadlin.Don't we have hime confirming that Prof used a preventative ability in Xadlin N1?
Yup. Xadlin is purple mafia. For that to make sense Prof would need to be red mafia. Yet, Prof voted TAT in D1. So that is one explanation, if we assume that Prof and Fang were indeed busdriven.Don't we have hime confirming that Prof used a preventative ability in Xadlin N1?
Because that is our wincon? To eliminate all threats to Fiore?
You realize if Ratchet is claiming BP, we cannot kill him with vig shot, right? With takes like this, I can't be sure if you guys want to play this game seriously or not.
Yup. Xadlin is purple mafia. For that to make sense Prof would need to be red mafia. Yet, Prof voted TAT in D1. So that is one explanation, if we assume that Prof and Fang were indeed busdriven.
Or another explanation is that Ratchet is lying about getting any invest result.
Which one is easier to swallow? You pick.
Ratchet is scum, though. A BP one at that.lynching scum > Lynching Indies
You've yet to explain why any investigator should claim an innocent result? It's objectively suboptimal.The fact is, Ratchet did not reveal the invest result in D2. Only after Fang was killed in N2, he brought up having investigated Prof in N1. That alone tells how much filler shit he has put into prop up his role.
Yet, you did that in D3. Why?You've yet to explain why any investigator should claim an innocent result? It's objectively suboptimal.
It's an awful defense lol why are you entertaining this?Good choice tbh .
I mean there's a reason I asked for an extension to start the phase lol. I didn't have time yesterday, my brother is getting married in 2 months and we had to plan some things.@Magic also fell off a lot, can you give your opinion on this when you return pls?
Because after seeing what I thought was Prof's role flip as Aurelian, I obviously have reason to suspect Prof on the basis he was busdriven? This is pretty obvious honestly.Yet, you did that in D3. Why?
The fact is, Ratchet did not reveal the invest result in D2. Only after Fang was killed in N2, he brought up having investigated Prof in N1. That alone tells how much filler shit he has put into prop up his role.
We already know that. Like, why are you even entertaining that he may be indie? Chuck's passive BP gifting proves that Ratchet was in the TMI. One of the red mafia survived a shot from purple mafia. Either Ratchet was shot, or they thought it would be better for Ratchet to claim that knowing there are bunch of sheeps like Flower sheeping him here.you are looking at him as if he was town tho.
he obviously isn't....
Why did he claim the kill shot on him
Why did he out dr today.
why is he doing all of this?
The kill thing to prove that he can't die.
He probably can die.
If I get shot I will claim I can't die just so maybe they stop shooting me.
doubt he is immortal.
the doctor stuff I think just cuz he got some heat today me thinks.
I think Tweet is more likely to flip scum than this RAEM guy but if the guy has just thrown in the towel regardless of alignment thats not great lmao
It doesn't prove this at all, though.Chuck's passive BP gifting proves that Ratchet was in the TMI.
Ironically, this is straight up TMI.One of the red mafia survived a shot from purple mafia.
We already know that. Like, why are you even entertaining that he may be indie? Chuck's passive BP gifting proves that Ratchet was in the TMI. One of the red mafia survived a shot from purple mafia. Either Ratchet was shot, or they thought it would be better for Ratchet to claim that knowing there are bunch of sheeps like Flower sheeping him here.